Follows the Hartman family and their dealings with a legendary creature when it begins coming around their farm house deep in the woods in the late 1960s.Follows the Hartman family and their dealings with a legendary creature when it begins coming around their farm house deep in the woods in the late 1960s.Follows the Hartman family and their dealings with a legendary creature when it begins coming around their farm house deep in the woods in the late 1960s.
- Awards
- 2 wins & 1 nomination total
Mike L. Hall
- Dale
- (as Mike Hall)
John F. Jones
- Young Chuck
- (as John Jones)
Matt Schonerstedt
- Preacher
- (as Matthew Schonerstedt)
- Directors
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Yes the acting and direction was bad - but so nostalgically so. What do I mean? It is filmed just like the B-movies from from the period they were depicting. The sets were right on for the period. The script, acting, directing and cinematography was so much like movies of the time that if didn't see the modern time scenes it would be hard to know that it wasn't filmed then. That actually would be a difficult thing to do today. For that reason, I assume it was all very intentional -- therefore I have to give major kudos to how well that was pulled off! Because of the nostalgia aspect I actually kind of enjoyed it. Sorry that seems missed by many reviewing. Oh well.
Fortunately for the movie I love all things Bigfoot. Sasquatch may be real, it may only be a legend and IMO most "eyewitness accounts" are overt fictitious accounts to get 5 seconds of notoriety. Still, I love the subject and movies like this are fun to watch (albeit a little painful, LOL). The acting speaks for itself so I'm not going to even comment on it. I actually thought the editing was on par with bigger budget productions so that's a plus. I did like the story and in the end that's all that matters.
Not the best acting but if you're a Bigfoot fan like me, you probably won't mind watching this. I liked the story, which is supposed to be based on true events.
This isn't a movie that's supposed to have an original plot. It's an extremely low budget visualization of the events that supposedly happened at Copalis Beach, Or. Is every little detail of the place and time accurate? Nah. Would it have been easy to fix those issues? Sure...but take it for what it is. If you want a good retelling of the events go on Bob Gymlan's Youtube channel and check it out. I wish they'd do more low budget visualizations of reported events.
The dialogue and delivery are very clunky but it's at least a more believable progression of events for a Bigfoot movie. The creature sound effects were actually pretty creepy, props for that. There's no denying it's a very low budget film but it's not awful. It doesn't demand your undivided attention so if you're into Bigfoot movies I'd recommend having it play while doing the dishes or paperwork etc. Woulda been 5/10 but a few particular scenes were so poorly acted it was plain awkward.
Did you know
- TriviaThe Cowman of Copolis Beach (which was an actual event that happened) was the inspiration for the script Something In The Woods.
- GoofsThe movie is supposed to take place around 1966-1968 but John's Chevy truck has an inspection sticker (actually two) that expire in May of 2012.
- ConnectionsFeatured in A Wish for Giants (2018)
- How long is Something in the Woods?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $125,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 28 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Something in the Woods (2015) officially released in India in English?
Answer