Lacey is an amusement park princess who befriends 8-year-old Rose, a real-life princess, and is recruited by her handsome father to travel to their kingdom and be the new governess.Lacey is an amusement park princess who befriends 8-year-old Rose, a real-life princess, and is recruited by her handsome father to travel to their kingdom and be the new governess.Lacey is an amusement park princess who befriends 8-year-old Rose, a real-life princess, and is recruited by her handsome father to travel to their kingdom and be the new governess.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured review
The premise is pure Hallmark: Theme park princess meet handsome real life prince.
However, there are some very un-Hallmark issues here; the Princess is worried about aging out of her job and is frustrated by her unfinished educational goals, the prince's young daughter has emotional issues due to the death of her mother.
So, it's not perfect in this tale of fairy land meets real life fairy land.
The problem is how the Prince is portrayed. He talks in formal complete sentences and acts like his shorts are too small. A bad parody of what Americans think "Royals" are like.
Cardboard antagonists (the icy Queen and "Privy Council" head) are there to create roadblocks.
In private conversations the Prince acts and sounds entirely artificial. How about having him have two personas...one stuffy and "official" when acting in a official capacity and another where he talks and acts like a regular guy when talking to his daughter and the young woman trying to help her? The script DOES have him talk with the child and princess, but the actor uses the same tone all the time.
Do the Hallmark execs think a character with two facets (personas) is too subtle for audiences?
I hate to say it, but you have to blame the director here. A bit of subtle characterization would have done wonders here. I'm no Scorsese, but after watching a few takes I would if had the actor do the scene both ways...the traditional stilted Hallmark method, and one where the prince is acting less stereotypically "royal" when he needs to. When talking privately, make him a real person, not a stuffy stereotype.
Sakura does a wonderful job given her constraints, Moseley given his experience playing a modern prince in "The Royals" soap should have pushed his character to make him more realistic and relatable.
I hope to see more of Sakura, she comes across as much more real and worldly than the usual Hallmark lead female.
The basics were there to make it a much warmer, more dramatic and touching (but still HEA) film.
Hopefully Hallmark will let writers, directors and actors expand from their (admittedly successful) approach.
However, there are some very un-Hallmark issues here; the Princess is worried about aging out of her job and is frustrated by her unfinished educational goals, the prince's young daughter has emotional issues due to the death of her mother.
So, it's not perfect in this tale of fairy land meets real life fairy land.
The problem is how the Prince is portrayed. He talks in formal complete sentences and acts like his shorts are too small. A bad parody of what Americans think "Royals" are like.
Cardboard antagonists (the icy Queen and "Privy Council" head) are there to create roadblocks.
In private conversations the Prince acts and sounds entirely artificial. How about having him have two personas...one stuffy and "official" when acting in a official capacity and another where he talks and acts like a regular guy when talking to his daughter and the young woman trying to help her? The script DOES have him talk with the child and princess, but the actor uses the same tone all the time.
Do the Hallmark execs think a character with two facets (personas) is too subtle for audiences?
I hate to say it, but you have to blame the director here. A bit of subtle characterization would have done wonders here. I'm no Scorsese, but after watching a few takes I would if had the actor do the scene both ways...the traditional stilted Hallmark method, and one where the prince is acting less stereotypically "royal" when he needs to. When talking privately, make him a real person, not a stuffy stereotype.
Sakura does a wonderful job given her constraints, Moseley given his experience playing a modern prince in "The Royals" soap should have pushed his character to make him more realistic and relatable.
I hope to see more of Sakura, she comes across as much more real and worldly than the usual Hallmark lead female.
The basics were there to make it a much warmer, more dramatic and touching (but still HEA) film.
Hopefully Hallmark will let writers, directors and actors expand from their (admittedly successful) approach.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThird of a "Royal" Trilogy aired on Hallmark Channel in March 2025. Prince Henry, lead male character of this film, Prince Desmond of Androvia, lead male character in The Royal We (2025), and Johnny Payne, heir to the Dukedom of Glasswick, England and lead male character in The Reluctant Royal (2025), are all cousins and referenced as such at the ends of both films.
- GoofsAs explained in the Trivia section, this movie is the third of a "Royal" Trilogy aired on Hallmark Channel in March 2025. Prince Henry, lead male character of this film, Prince Desmond of Androvia, lead male character in The Royal We (2025), and Johnny Payne, heir to the Dukedom of Glasswick, England and lead male character in The Reluctant Royal (2025), are all cousins and referenced as such at the ends of both other films.
At the end of The Reluctant Royal (2025), Johnny's father William, Duke of Glasswick, tells him that they are sending one of their horses, a black stallion named Biscuit and the offspring of their favorite horse Triscuit, to Johnny's Cousin Henry as a gift for his American girlfriend. At the end of this movie, the offspring of Triscuit arrives from Uncle Will, but is a WHITE stallion.
- ConnectionsReferences Outlander (2014)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Filming locations
- Grona Lund, Stockholm, Sweden(Aerial shot of amusement park)
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content