18 reviews
With all the terrible news in the real world, it's time to just give yourself a bit of time to enjoy a happy, make believe story. This movie does that. First off, Andrew Walker is Andrew Walker. He almost always gives an extraordinary performance in these movies and he does it again here. The supporting cast...especially the elder Duke ...all give wonderful performances. The only minus with this movie is there is so much to cover, you wish the movie was longer. You wish you could spend more time with each of the characters and learn more about them. There just was too much to cover. But that aside...you root for them...you learn about them...you enjoy their company. So, sit back...let your imagination go...enjoy Andrew Walker...enjoy the story...enjoy the townspeople...enjoy the staff...enjoy the journey. You will find it time well spent.
- rstoj-83817
- Mar 14, 2025
- Permalink
I did not like the tone of this story. The commoner coming in and saving the day might have been a nice story. And he does keep triumphing in almost everything he does including showing up an experienced horseman even though his only riding experience seems to only be riding a mechanical bull. That was a little too much.
The son of a Duke is automatically a Lord and I think has the title Marquess. Yet the cousin constantly insults him. Would he get away with that in front of a group?
The story goes about how you'd expect. The cousin who is the alternate heir becomes the villain. Two relationships develop. The potential romance is rushed because of everything else going on. The story makes a point of a potential problem there and also rushes dealing with it.
The acting is OK, but not great. The dialogue is mostly bland with maybe one or two good lines.
Like the movie, The Royal We, from the previous week on Hallmark, there is an epilogue where the three royal movies of March 2025 are tied together. It was clever in that one, but seemed forced and abrupt in this one.
The son of a Duke is automatically a Lord and I think has the title Marquess. Yet the cousin constantly insults him. Would he get away with that in front of a group?
The story goes about how you'd expect. The cousin who is the alternate heir becomes the villain. Two relationships develop. The potential romance is rushed because of everything else going on. The story makes a point of a potential problem there and also rushes dealing with it.
The acting is OK, but not great. The dialogue is mostly bland with maybe one or two good lines.
Like the movie, The Royal We, from the previous week on Hallmark, there is an epilogue where the three royal movies of March 2025 are tied together. It was clever in that one, but seemed forced and abrupt in this one.
Something has changed with Hallmark as this, and a few (not all) recent releases have been much better than the previous slow and fairly boring products. I will admit that I often play some sort of game on my phone while watching these movies as they are not all that riviting. With this movie, there was no game playing as it catches your attention at the beginning and keeps it throughout. Fresh dialogue and fun to watch. Is it predictable, sure. Is it still fun, absolutely. Keep it up Hallmark and please present more movies like this one. Oh, and I love having new talent take prominent roles such as the very talented lead actress in this movie as Hallmark was overusing the same players. Well done.
- cincy-47983
- Mar 9, 2025
- Permalink
I pretty much steer clear of Hallmark these days. Most of it is highly obnoxious. But for reasons unknown I gave this one a shot. And it wasn't bad. It wasn't great but it managed to be cute enough reminiscent of some of the cute but not so great old Hallmark fare.
Andrew Walker did well of a bit awkward at first playing a 38 year old man who kinda acted like a 22 year old kid. But he got better enough as it went along. The actress who played Prudence had to grow on me but when she did in liked her well enough.
The story was simplistic and predictable but that's not always a problem. The villains were cartoonish and unnecessary. A conflict not needed since the others could've been filled out.
I won't call it a must see but I wouldn't warn anyone off either. Take it or leave it. Hallmark has much worse to offer these days.
Andrew Walker did well of a bit awkward at first playing a 38 year old man who kinda acted like a 22 year old kid. But he got better enough as it went along. The actress who played Prudence had to grow on me but when she did in liked her well enough.
The story was simplistic and predictable but that's not always a problem. The villains were cartoonish and unnecessary. A conflict not needed since the others could've been filled out.
I won't call it a must see but I wouldn't warn anyone off either. Take it or leave it. Hallmark has much worse to offer these days.
The promos sounded like a lower-scale, lower-budgeted rehash of the premise of KING RALPH with John Goodman, Peter O'Toole and John Hurt; I soon realized this wasn't quite the case or presented as that kind of LOL comedy, but I still got a lot more LOL moments than I expected. A large part of that is that I've been calling the Greater Philadelphia Metro Region home for the past 55 years and have many friends who are from South Philly or are first-generation children of transplants from South Philly to the South Jersey suburbs where I grew up. If there's going to be a culture clash between British aristocracy and an American-born heir, I can't think of a character that would bring sparks to that clash, more than Ralph the Las Vegas lounge singer, than a working stiff from South Philly. Small references to South Philly from protagonist Johnny in reply to his snooty cousin Allistair brought the biggest laughs such as the one after Allistair identifies himself as being of "Winshere, north of Devon". (I have to give kudos to Andrew Walker for NOT trying too hard to do a South Philly accent. Most actors not native to the PA-NJ-NY region end up not getting the subtle differences between the accents that are most concentrated, and end up overdoing it AND coming off with a Brooklyn or Bayonne NJ accent instead!)
The characters are engaging and most are likeable, and their actors have excellent chemistry. That between Andrew Walker (Johnny) and Emilie de Ravin (Prudence) is particularly involving. The characters are dynamic in the true old high school Language Arts class sense of changing due to the events of the story. Many of the "snooty" aristocratic characters end up not being as stereotypical as initially presented.
Just a little note here. Some of the reviewers mention the ridiculous notion that Johnny supposedly got his horseback riding skills to help another rider in distress by being the mechanical bull riding champion at his South Philly bar. Just thought I'd mention that the Pennsylvania Army National Guard has an Armored Cavalry squadron in Philadelphia that has a rather elaborate ceremonial horse team; if the writers had been aware of that fact, they could have made Johnny a former enlisted member (say a tank mechanic) of that unit and have gotten his riding skills with that horse team, a much more plausible/credible explanation. (I myself organized a much smaller, lower-budgeted and less elaborate horse team within my old New Jersey National Guard unit.)
I'll say this is one of the best Working Class American amid stuffy European Royalty movies Hallmark has ever done. One star off for the silly mechanical bull story. (And do I mean BULL!)
The characters are engaging and most are likeable, and their actors have excellent chemistry. That between Andrew Walker (Johnny) and Emilie de Ravin (Prudence) is particularly involving. The characters are dynamic in the true old high school Language Arts class sense of changing due to the events of the story. Many of the "snooty" aristocratic characters end up not being as stereotypical as initially presented.
Just a little note here. Some of the reviewers mention the ridiculous notion that Johnny supposedly got his horseback riding skills to help another rider in distress by being the mechanical bull riding champion at his South Philly bar. Just thought I'd mention that the Pennsylvania Army National Guard has an Armored Cavalry squadron in Philadelphia that has a rather elaborate ceremonial horse team; if the writers had been aware of that fact, they could have made Johnny a former enlisted member (say a tank mechanic) of that unit and have gotten his riding skills with that horse team, a much more plausible/credible explanation. (I myself organized a much smaller, lower-budgeted and less elaborate horse team within my old New Jersey National Guard unit.)
I'll say this is one of the best Working Class American amid stuffy European Royalty movies Hallmark has ever done. One star off for the silly mechanical bull story. (And do I mean BULL!)
Hallmark seems, with this movie, (and a few others recently) to have gotten back to what they did best before the whole Hallmark/Great American flap happened. The movie is fun, Andrew is is rare form and it was genuinely fun! Enjoy! The female lead is also very good. She seems to have jumped right into the Hallmark world and "nailed it". The scenery and even the old car What was it? A Triumph? (note the right hand drive!) add a level of believe ability that just adds to the quality of the movie. The only thing that irked me (just a bit) was the hair color application for Andrew...a little, I don't know... weird? Loved it! Keep it up Hallmark!
- valleylane-27243
- Mar 9, 2025
- Permalink
I have to say this is one of the best Hallmark movies I've seen in a long time. I had to double check that it actually was a Hallmark movie. Loveable characters, some well placed humour- it's really enjoyable. Andrew Walker is excellent in this and yes, he really does his own singing. It's not a musical but there are a couple of short songs in it
Love the story line.
In so many of these movies the supposedly romantic closed mouth kiss in the big finale is so unnatural I sometimes wonder if the actors can tolerate each. Not the case in this one. What a pleasant change to the phony end in many others.
Great show and the acting makes all the difference. Andrew Walker makes all the difference in the world to the quality of this movie.
In so many of these movies the supposedly romantic closed mouth kiss in the big finale is so unnatural I sometimes wonder if the actors can tolerate each. Not the case in this one. What a pleasant change to the phony end in many others.
Great show and the acting makes all the difference. Andrew Walker makes all the difference in the world to the quality of this movie.
- avalontournier
- Mar 19, 2025
- Permalink
This is by far the best movie of the year for HallMark (HM) ANDREW walker again does it again. He did an incredible job and his partner have excellent screen chemistry. The supporting cast were wonderful and I wish there was more time to develope them. I wouldn't mind see this as a series. HM is getting back to thier roots with this movie.
I like the location and the scenes of the country side was a nice touch. The villains as usual were to predictable for my only cretinism. Andrew Walker have developed into a very actor and gives HM almost a guarantee of a good movie. All in all a def 10 and look forward to more movies with this one of scripts and acting.
I like the location and the scenes of the country side was a nice touch. The villains as usual were to predictable for my only cretinism. Andrew Walker have developed into a very actor and gives HM almost a guarantee of a good movie. All in all a def 10 and look forward to more movies with this one of scripts and acting.
I am sure that I have seen every single one of the "ROYAL" Hallmark Movies. Hallmark is REALLY good at this genre. The Reluctant Royal is absolutely at the top of the list.
Although I probably could watch Andrew Walker read the Phone Book (kids, ask your Parents what that is) he has been a favourite of mine for years.
Andrew was terrific as the Reluctant Royal.
This was really more Romantic Comedy than your typical Hallmark Movie. They should put this one on Prime or another Streaming Service so that others get to see it and not just the usual Hallmark Bunch.
Andrew is hilarious and his comedic timing is great. At first I wasn't sure about the chemistry between "Prudence & Johnny" but it only took a few minutes to see that Emilie de Ravin would fit right in.
VERY Cute Movie!
Although I probably could watch Andrew Walker read the Phone Book (kids, ask your Parents what that is) he has been a favourite of mine for years.
Andrew was terrific as the Reluctant Royal.
This was really more Romantic Comedy than your typical Hallmark Movie. They should put this one on Prime or another Streaming Service so that others get to see it and not just the usual Hallmark Bunch.
Andrew is hilarious and his comedic timing is great. At first I wasn't sure about the chemistry between "Prudence & Johnny" but it only took a few minutes to see that Emilie de Ravin would fit right in.
VERY Cute Movie!
This may well be the best-written Hallmark romance movie I've ever seen. I thoroughly enjoyed the story. I loved the real-feel of Philly (one of the few Hallmark movies to get a regional flavor right -- although the accents are almost too Canadian but the language and attitude are South Philly).
I also enjoyed the subtle and not-so-subtle ways that the son was seen to be a mirror of his father. And how, once the father got his mojo back, he became a real person (including the hug!).
The singular miss was at the very end when the banter in the stable could have been polished a bit better. If every minute before that hadn't been so right-on, I wouldn't have even noticed.
For those curious, Johnny is likely going to become a Viscount, Marquess, or Earl since most Dukes carry more than one title. The eldest son is invested with one of those lesser titles and carries it even after he's made Duke. The fact that no one calls him Viscount St. George (or whatever the title might be) or "My Lord" is because he hasn't yet been invested with the title.
I also enjoyed the subtle and not-so-subtle ways that the son was seen to be a mirror of his father. And how, once the father got his mojo back, he became a real person (including the hug!).
The singular miss was at the very end when the banter in the stable could have been polished a bit better. If every minute before that hadn't been so right-on, I wouldn't have even noticed.
For those curious, Johnny is likely going to become a Viscount, Marquess, or Earl since most Dukes carry more than one title. The eldest son is invested with one of those lesser titles and carries it even after he's made Duke. The fact that no one calls him Viscount St. George (or whatever the title might be) or "My Lord" is because he hasn't yet been invested with the title.
- FrankWButterfield
- Mar 23, 2025
- Permalink
I've mostly stopped watching Hallmark movies because they've become so bad. However I still watch the ratings because every once in awhile a good one surfaces. This movie is one of the good ones.
I won't detail out the movie plot but this is a story about a man and his father. Both actors portray their characters very well and they shine in scenes together. I know Hallmark makes "romance" movies but the relationship and scenes with the two men steal the show.
Yes, there is a love story in this movie but it takes a back seat to the plot which is very refreshing.
No, this isn't your typical "prince/royal" movie so if you're tired of those types of plots don't worry as this breaks the mold. It's not a novel plot (I'm pretty sure John Goodman was in a movie with a similar plot decades ago) but it's a well told story that keeps you interested and the number of cliche Hallmark moments to a minimum.
Definitely worth a watch!
I won't detail out the movie plot but this is a story about a man and his father. Both actors portray their characters very well and they shine in scenes together. I know Hallmark makes "romance" movies but the relationship and scenes with the two men steal the show.
Yes, there is a love story in this movie but it takes a back seat to the plot which is very refreshing.
No, this isn't your typical "prince/royal" movie so if you're tired of those types of plots don't worry as this breaks the mold. It's not a novel plot (I'm pretty sure John Goodman was in a movie with a similar plot decades ago) but it's a well told story that keeps you interested and the number of cliche Hallmark moments to a minimum.
Definitely worth a watch!
- aussiegirl-65915
- Mar 22, 2025
- Permalink
7.7 stars.
I anticipated this Hallmark would be a bit better than it turned out however, it still did not disappoint. I feel that the story is a bit slow at times, somehow the characters weren't as lively as expected, the the mood wasn't as exuberant as some other royal romances. That feeling of expectation, leading up to the final romantic encounter, it was somewhat absent. The leads don't have quite the chemistry that is generally considered the bread and butter of an exceptional romance. On the other hand, I actually laughed a few times-a very rare reaction to Hallmark romances.
However, the overall experience was fine. I would say this film falls a bit short of greatness in several different categories. It's one of those slightly above average Hallmark movies, perhaps a 7.1, but since I really like all the actors and their personalities grow on you after a while, it's elevated to a 7.7. Anything 7.5 through 7.7 I feel like watching again in 2-5 years, depending on my mood at the time. Generally, I rate based on my initial impression, "do I want to see this again in the next couple years, five years, or maybe revisit this one in ten years to never?" If the answer is five years, then my rating is generally 7.5 - 7.6. I think I might be in the mood for 'The Reluctant Royal' in 3 years-just a hunch. It's a strict system, because those unfortunate 7.4's I will probably never deign to watch again, but I must be true to the system or I'll be wasting precious time rewatching average films-time that should be allocated to new releases and favorites.
I anticipated this Hallmark would be a bit better than it turned out however, it still did not disappoint. I feel that the story is a bit slow at times, somehow the characters weren't as lively as expected, the the mood wasn't as exuberant as some other royal romances. That feeling of expectation, leading up to the final romantic encounter, it was somewhat absent. The leads don't have quite the chemistry that is generally considered the bread and butter of an exceptional romance. On the other hand, I actually laughed a few times-a very rare reaction to Hallmark romances.
However, the overall experience was fine. I would say this film falls a bit short of greatness in several different categories. It's one of those slightly above average Hallmark movies, perhaps a 7.1, but since I really like all the actors and their personalities grow on you after a while, it's elevated to a 7.7. Anything 7.5 through 7.7 I feel like watching again in 2-5 years, depending on my mood at the time. Generally, I rate based on my initial impression, "do I want to see this again in the next couple years, five years, or maybe revisit this one in ten years to never?" If the answer is five years, then my rating is generally 7.5 - 7.6. I think I might be in the mood for 'The Reluctant Royal' in 3 years-just a hunch. It's a strict system, because those unfortunate 7.4's I will probably never deign to watch again, but I must be true to the system or I'll be wasting precious time rewatching average films-time that should be allocated to new releases and favorites.
This film is an absolute standout, not just for its entertainment value but for its remarkably strong writing. It takes what could have been a predictable "fish out of water" story and instead subverts expectations at every turn, delivering a fresh and engaging narrative. The dialogue is sharp, the character development is compelling, and every scene feels purposeful. The humor and emotional beats land effortlessly, never feeling forced or overly familiar. It's rare to find a movie that balances wit and originality so well, making it a must-watch for anyone who appreciates clever storytelling.
- imdbfan-6141026328
- Mar 11, 2025
- Permalink
Hallmark stories have become so predictable over the last so many years. I say stories because I guess overall I knew how this story would turn out too. It was the getting there part that made the story so much better than the average Hallmark movie. They have been the same thing over and over again for awhile. Once in awhile something comes up that stands out more than the rest. This movie was entertaining, I enjoyed the characters and I didn't get bored and wonder why I was watching it. I had quite a few laughs to boot. It's always a good feeling when we laugh. It was a nice couple of hours.
At the start, it seemed like the set up of the plot moved too fast and seemed unrealistic. But once Johnny is in England, the story goes well. Andrew Walker does an excellent job in his character as a Philly guy. I hoped he would have thrown in a "yous guys" at some point, but he really made the character well. That is, I didn't think of him form any former roles. The same can be said of many of the other main actors. Emilie as Prudence was bright and lovely, and I liked the background story that we just get a hint of, indicating that she had a similar history to Johnny.
The tell-tale of a good Hallmark movie: I shed a few heartfelt tears at the end during the Duke's speech.
The tell-tale of a good Hallmark movie: I shed a few heartfelt tears at the end during the Duke's speech.
- richardnjacob
- Mar 14, 2025
- Permalink
- herrcarter-92161
- Jul 20, 2025
- Permalink