Lost Monster Files

I don't usually waste my time reviewing this type of "find things that aren't there" shows, but since this show has sunk to a new level of low, I felt I had to say something,

That anybody thought it was an acceptable idea to show a man urinating in public and then wiping his hands on the bare skin of a woman, is disgusting. This individual should be charged with assault! I hope his mother is proud of his deviant behaviour in public and how he treats women, he is just a pig!

In addition, that the program management decided to include this in a program that children could watch is reprehensible, there is no excuse for this kind of behaviour or program content. My wife commented that should any man use her as toilet paper, she would feed him to the Chupacabra.

It is indicative of just how unprofessional this group is and why they should not be allowed to produce anything. I hope the network reviews this and cancels it!

Wishing this show was stillborn, have a nice day.

This new scientific approach to locating zoological specimens that have yet to be identified or have been previously unknown to science is refreshing. From the opening of the show, it's was fast paced and covered a lot of ground. The researchers involved each bring different skills to the table to apply Ivan Sanderson's files in the hunt for these unidentified specimens. I thoroughly enjoyed watching the interaction between the researchers and the discussions that bring them to their conclusions. The eye witnesses definitely experienced something that is unexplainable to them. The research ties their stories together and brought a coherent conclusion to the evidence. Bravo. Well done.

I enjoy the exploration aspect, but the pretend scientific nature is ridiculous.

There is no such field as "zoo-ology", no such practitioner as a "zoo-ologist", and the fact that that they use those terms kills off any pretense of professionalism.

The term's origin is the Greek word "zoe" (in English characters), which is pronounced "zo-ay" not "zoo-ay". The study of life, zoology, is therefore pronounced "zo-ology", and not "zoo-ology", and a person who works in the field, a zoologist, is pronounced as "zo-ologist", and not "zoo-ologist". A person who is not simply an actor, who actually works in the field would know that. They would have learned that even if they took a zoology (zo-ology) course as a college freshman, much less someone who claims to be a professional "zoo-ologist".

I love history and find the legends interesting, but as a person with a graduate degree who works in a STEM field, the unprofessionalism is like nails on a blackboard to me.

Like most shows of this kind, they go around the country investigating some of the creatures from folklore. Unlike other shows they use the library of research from Sanderson to Jumpstart their investigations. Most of the hosts appear to keep open minds during these searches. They interview witnesses, look for evidence, and delve into some of the lore of the creatures. While open to possibilities the cast mostly keep a practical and scientific eye, except one. Brittany, the cryptozoologist, constantly argues no matter what the evidence says that it could be a cryptid. While it is good to not write off other explanations, she consistently writes off everything and assumes all things are true and everything is really just a cryptid and they just didn't find it this time. She's obnoxious and you can tell at times the other investigators are quite annoyed by her. She's the only one who constantly seems like the dumb one and entirely out of place.

It's wonderful that there's a new cryptid show that highlighting the work and voice of Ivan Sanderson. Being able to watch and hear him while the cast explores his life's work is really something special.

The cast is an interesting mix of personalities. I like that there isn't consensus between them when discussing the animals and that they each have their own takes. Only the chupacabra episode has aired so far, but if it's any indicator of the quality of witnesses they bring on, I think we're in for a real roller coaster. The lady with the taxidermy was compelling and analytical while the rest were what you might expect at a local watering hole. I think that blend was perfect.

I have high hopes for the future of this show - great cast, compelling witnesses, and really well put together.

A good show for any fan of cryptozoology!