A contemporary retelling of Louisa May Alcott's 1868 classic, following author Jo March as she returns home to celebrate Christmas with sisters Meg, Beth, and Amy.A contemporary retelling of Louisa May Alcott's 1868 classic, following author Jo March as she returns home to celebrate Christmas with sisters Meg, Beth, and Amy.A contemporary retelling of Louisa May Alcott's 1868 classic, following author Jo March as she returns home to celebrate Christmas with sisters Meg, Beth, and Amy.
Featured reviews
If you saw the disaster of a romance movie called 'Prescription for Love' starring these two leads, you at least have to admit the script for this one is far more suitable...especially for Trevor Donovan. This actor does best when the romance blossoms early on and the screenplay doesn't call for him to be bumbling and tongue-tied/shy at the onset. This movie isn't perfect in that regard (in that he can't come clean right away about working for her employer) but that cringe-quotient is far less than being a clueless doctor in 'Prescription'. Here, the romance progresses credibly and the 'conflict' is also real-world credible. Marsh is attractive and sweet and her only problem....if such a thing is actually a problem in real life....is the she looks far younger than her age. She looked like a teenage nurse in 'Prescription' and here a bit young to already have achieved a list of best-sellers.
After reading some of the other reviews, I didn't know whether to expect the greatest movie ever, or the worst.
Well of course it was neither.
I never read the Alcott books, or any of the other "chick" stories, but I am familiar with some of them. People have been making movies loosely based on them forever.
They put in things they think are clever (Alcott Grove, a waitress named Louisa May) that really just make it irritating.
This movie is a modern retelling, and while not a significant achievement in film, is not as bad as some of the reviews I've read.
I agree there could have been a stronger lead, but I haven't seen Trevor Donovan even mentioned, and he was very good.
The whole four sisters thing was overdone, and they didn't really look or feel like sisters. They basically had four lead actresses jockeying for position. That never works.
I do like the GAC is making a concerted effort to include the Lord in all the movies I've seen this year.
I thought this movie was fine. To me that's good enough.
Seven.
Well of course it was neither.
I never read the Alcott books, or any of the other "chick" stories, but I am familiar with some of them. People have been making movies loosely based on them forever.
They put in things they think are clever (Alcott Grove, a waitress named Louisa May) that really just make it irritating.
This movie is a modern retelling, and while not a significant achievement in film, is not as bad as some of the reviews I've read.
I agree there could have been a stronger lead, but I haven't seen Trevor Donovan even mentioned, and he was very good.
The whole four sisters thing was overdone, and they didn't really look or feel like sisters. They basically had four lead actresses jockeying for position. That never works.
I do like the GAC is making a concerted effort to include the Lord in all the movies I've seen this year.
I thought this movie was fine. To me that's good enough.
Seven.
A fellow viewer remarked that this film resembled a high school production, and I wholeheartedly concur. The performances were lacking, and the writing left much to be desired. It is disheartening to see such a beloved story treated in this manner. One notable issue was the dialogue; characters frequently addressed each other by name in a way that felt unnatural. While this approach may have been intended to reinforce their identities as characters from Little Women, it ultimately detracted from the authenticity of their interactions. In reality, conversations are rarely so contrived-people do not typically enter a room with greetings like, "Hi John, my favorite brother." The script contributed to a sense of stiffness among the actors, resulting in performances that felt wooden and unconvincing. Additionally, the two standout performers, Jen Lily and Jesse Hutch, were relegated to minor roles when their talents could have significantly enhanced the film had they been given more substantial parts. As a devoted fan of the original novel and previous adaptations of Little Women, as well as wholesome films produced by GAC, I found this interpretation disappointing. Despite its good intentions, the execution fell short. I would recommend that future productions invest more time in developing a strong script rather than relying solely on the established names from such an esteemed literary work.
It's been a mixed bag for GAC Family Christmas movies in 2024 and the much-hyped and rather ambitious "A Little Women's Christmas" (a modern day retelling of the Louisa May Alcott novel) was, for me, underwhelming.
It was a weak and clunky script, lacking humour and featuring too many cliched lines.
The script error was compounded by casting Jillian Murray in the lead role, rather than the more accomplished Jen Lilley or Laura Osnes. Seemed like a waste, having someone like Lilley in the movie but relegated almost to a supporting role. Trevor Donovan was well cast, though. He always seems to do a very good job,
Whilst they appear to have a lot of the big ex-Hallmark stars, movies made for and by GAC Family need better production values. They trail Hallmark by a long way in this very important area. The sets all screamed "low budget", an area that needs to be tidied up quick smart. It's a waste of their acting talent, otherwise.
It was a weak and clunky script, lacking humour and featuring too many cliched lines.
The script error was compounded by casting Jillian Murray in the lead role, rather than the more accomplished Jen Lilley or Laura Osnes. Seemed like a waste, having someone like Lilley in the movie but relegated almost to a supporting role. Trevor Donovan was well cast, though. He always seems to do a very good job,
Whilst they appear to have a lot of the big ex-Hallmark stars, movies made for and by GAC Family need better production values. They trail Hallmark by a long way in this very important area. The sets all screamed "low budget", an area that needs to be tidied up quick smart. It's a waste of their acting talent, otherwise.
Really? They have Jen Lilley and Jesse Hutch but didn't put them in lead roles? Jillian Murray is too weak an actress for a lead. She was boring in the lead and her low cut dress at church was inappropriate for a GAC movie. The movie had good bones but was pretty boring and needed a meatier script with more humorous lines.
As far as the Little Women theme, it fell flat. The relationships between the characters was weak. Laurie and Jo have a history that was not at all apparent. I did love Gladys Night and the other singers at the church though. I feel I wasted 2 hours of my life. I love GAC and I'm praying for better scripts!
As far as the Little Women theme, it fell flat. The relationships between the characters was weak. Laurie and Jo have a history that was not at all apparent. I did love Gladys Night and the other singers at the church though. I feel I wasted 2 hours of my life. I love GAC and I'm praying for better scripts!
Did you know
- TriviaFilmed in Franklin Tennessee, many of the locations are businesses in the downtown area.
Details
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was A Little Women's Christmas (2024) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer