IMDb RATING
3.7/10
1.7K
YOUR RATING
Three treasure hunters searching for Saxon gold stumble upon mysterious aerial phenomena. When darkness descends and their equipment malfunctions, they face an otherworldly threat in the sam... Read allThree treasure hunters searching for Saxon gold stumble upon mysterious aerial phenomena. When darkness descends and their equipment malfunctions, they face an otherworldly threat in the same area as a historic UFO case.Three treasure hunters searching for Saxon gold stumble upon mysterious aerial phenomena. When darkness descends and their equipment malfunctions, they face an otherworldly threat in the same area as a historic UFO case.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Photos
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I had read somewhere Hangar 10 had something to do with Severance (the excellent Brit comedy/horror) therefore I was expecting the same director, or writer perhaps, I think I was wrong. First off the acting isn't too bad and the story line is not entirely off point. Too much time most certainly is spent in the woods however and a meandering atmosphere soon sets in. It's obvious the found footage style is here to stay however a real drawback in this movie was the extent of it and the implementation - I really had enough of it. To the point it detracted from the movie unfortunately, and this movie does gain momentum towards the end so that was quite a shame. You'd have to be a real hardcore Sci-Fi fan and not mind headache inducing camera work to enjoy, which is a shame as I think the ingredients were there for an enjoyable movie but did not make it for me. As a comparison Probability of girlfriend enjoying District 9- 100% Hangar 10- 0%.
This has to be the worst found footage film of all time. It's boring. It's slow. It's all over the place. Terrible camera work. Cheap Effects. Bad Acting.
This is an insult to the Rendlesham Forest Incident.
UFO stuff should be scary and have an atmosphere to them, this Hangar 10 garbage has none, not one sign of it.
I have to say again the camera work is terrible, its so shaky, they should not of let the clueless actors hold the camera. What you see on screen is the result of people that have no idea of how to handle a camera.
Don't bother with this so called film, it sucks and more so.
Mike.
This is an insult to the Rendlesham Forest Incident.
UFO stuff should be scary and have an atmosphere to them, this Hangar 10 garbage has none, not one sign of it.
I have to say again the camera work is terrible, its so shaky, they should not of let the clueless actors hold the camera. What you see on screen is the result of people that have no idea of how to handle a camera.
Don't bother with this so called film, it sucks and more so.
Mike.
Best left undiscovered. In terms of restaurants, that one you would never, ever admit going to.
This movie had some things going for it. I think the actors are strong. The special effects, especially at the end, are really good. Also, I like alien found footage movies. They are a little more unique than the supernatural found footage.
The problem is the writing. The dialogue is simplistic. As a result, it is hard to figure out what is going on for most of the second and third acts. This movie has a major problem with character motivation as well. The question of why the characters are there, why they are filming, and why they don't give up just haunt the viewer throughout.
The problem is the writing. The dialogue is simplistic. As a result, it is hard to figure out what is going on for most of the second and third acts. This movie has a major problem with character motivation as well. The question of why the characters are there, why they are filming, and why they don't give up just haunt the viewer throughout.
This movie was terrible. I love a good alien flick, and this new "found footage" styling has its merits, but only when done well. This movie was neither entertaining or exciting. There were a couple of almost moments; however, it was mostly just a lot of waiting around for something to happen. There's a plot, but it's weak. There's an underlying element of alien spookiness, but it never really gets played out well. From the home camera footage to the lack of any real story within the plot to the overly anti-climatic ending, I basically kept thinking to myself it was like watching the travesty of the Blair Witch Project all over again. Except only with the hint of alien flair.
Did you know
- TriviaThis film is also known as "the Rendlesham UFO incident"
- GoofsWhen they are in the forest they are there illegally. they go at night so they won't be seen but then use torches and talk in rather loud voices. This defeats the object of going at night.
- ConnectionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Alien Movies That Were Based on True Events (2021)
- How long is Hangar 10?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- The Rendlesham UFO Incident
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 27 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content