User reviews

I have to disagree with one of the other reviews saying it reduces Alaska to a supporting cast. Firstly, this series is titled Sue Perkins: Lost in Alaska. The series is about Sue and her adventures in Alaska, it is not just a travel documentary.

Sue Perkins is witty, clever and funny in this series and does take a genuine interest in the people that she meets along the way, she also is mesmerized by her locations. Ultimately, I love the look of Alaska and have always wanted to go there, but I watched this series to see Sue's perspective on this place and watch her adventures and that is exactly what it delivered.

I recently stumbled upon Sue's travel documentaries and have been journeying all over the world with her. It's been pure bliss!

I was very excited to find this one in Alaska and it's absolutely brilliant. I love Sue's humor, insight, curiosity and child-like wonder. I love how in awe she is of everything around her. Add the stunning mountains and scenery and we have the perfect set up for a fascinating journey through the gorgeous state of Alaska.

My heart was left filled with wonder and a deep yearning for more. The only way I could love this series more is if I could magic a way to be there with her. *sigh* A girl can dream...

Sue Perkins is an intelligent, insightful, witty presenter with a deservedly long media career.

This series however places her front and centre at almost every moment sidelining the State and its people. By episode 3 Alaska is almost a backdrop; "Look at this! Roaring rapids.." the camera instead stays on Sue. And "This is true silence..." on arriving in McCarthy only to cut to the next scene. Even during a guided walk the silence is mentioned again, and again interrupted with chatter and background music.

This travelogue needs re-editing to bring the locals and land much more front and centre with Sue's contributions supporting rather than detracting from the subject.

There are some nice observations, such as the toilet breaks montage, that deliberately puncture the travelogue illusions such as "roughing it" and revealing her own culture differences.

I'd appreciate more travelogues from Sue Perkins with more disciplined editing; less of Sue on camera, more of the locals and landscape, less of her detracting humour, more of her insight and interviews.