A period adaptation of Jane Austen's "Sense and Sensibility". After a change in circumstances, Marianne is torn between two men, while Elinor longs for a man beyond reach. Stars Deborah Ayor... Read allA period adaptation of Jane Austen's "Sense and Sensibility". After a change in circumstances, Marianne is torn between two men, while Elinor longs for a man beyond reach. Stars Deborah Ayorinde, Bethany Antonia, and Dan Jeannotte.A period adaptation of Jane Austen's "Sense and Sensibility". After a change in circumstances, Marianne is torn between two men, while Elinor longs for a man beyond reach. Stars Deborah Ayorinde, Bethany Antonia, and Dan Jeannotte.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
A big ugh.
Period pieces or contemporary versions based on classic novels etc - are great when they are done well and are respectful to the original material and time period and if changed and "updated" provide plausible context for the changes.
The 1995 Pride and Prejudice, Doctor Thorne, Downton Abby are examples of terrific period pieces.
On the opposite end, the Keira Knightley Pride and Prejudice, Anya Taylor-Joe's Emma, CW's Reign among many others were just horrid...
This Hallmark version of Sense & Sensibility was sad and bad on all levels. Felt like a high school student trying to make an "updated" film.
The anachronistic concept did not make sense to begin with.
Why not use the story line and do something in a believable circumstance and setting?
If wedded to a "period piece" then how about changing the setting to, for example, early 1900s USA?
Or do a modern version like Clueless (Emma)?
The actors seemed miserable..
And completely weird to have Dan Jeannotte as the hero here.
If the point of the production was to recast, then Edward should have been played by a Black actor - so many talented Black British actors like Alfred Enoch or Ashley Walter or Gary Carr to name a few.
Period pieces or contemporary versions based on classic novels etc - are great when they are done well and are respectful to the original material and time period and if changed and "updated" provide plausible context for the changes.
The 1995 Pride and Prejudice, Doctor Thorne, Downton Abby are examples of terrific period pieces.
On the opposite end, the Keira Knightley Pride and Prejudice, Anya Taylor-Joe's Emma, CW's Reign among many others were just horrid...
This Hallmark version of Sense & Sensibility was sad and bad on all levels. Felt like a high school student trying to make an "updated" film.
The anachronistic concept did not make sense to begin with.
Why not use the story line and do something in a believable circumstance and setting?
If wedded to a "period piece" then how about changing the setting to, for example, early 1900s USA?
Or do a modern version like Clueless (Emma)?
The actors seemed miserable..
And completely weird to have Dan Jeannotte as the hero here.
If the point of the production was to recast, then Edward should have been played by a Black actor - so many talented Black British actors like Alfred Enoch or Ashley Walter or Gary Carr to name a few.
Hallmark needs to stay in its lane and stick to pumping out crappy romcoms; under no circumstances should they try to remake a classic. This version is an affront to all things Jane Austen and the multiple Oscar nominated Ang Lee version.
The lack of chemistry between the "romantic" leads is appalling. The costumes are apparently an effort to replicate the worst of the Featherington girls in Bridgerton. The acting is wooden, especially by the males. Willoughby, supposed to be a charming bad guy, comes across like a robot.
The whole thing was a cluttered, disjointed, unorganized mess.
The rating of two is entirely because of the scenery. Period.
The lack of chemistry between the "romantic" leads is appalling. The costumes are apparently an effort to replicate the worst of the Featherington girls in Bridgerton. The acting is wooden, especially by the males. Willoughby, supposed to be a charming bad guy, comes across like a robot.
The whole thing was a cluttered, disjointed, unorganized mess.
The rating of two is entirely because of the scenery. Period.
No. Just no.
This version should never have been made. The acting was incredibly horrible. Such.bad.acting.
I am SO disappointed. I adore all Jane Austen books. I HAVE all Jane Austen books. And the movies.
The man who plays Willoughby is soooo boring and dull.
And the women's clothes!!!!! We're like like...Whatttt??? They were not authentic at all, not in the least. Oh, be still my heart.
I do like the actor who plays Sir John Middleton. He did an adequate job.
The storyline felt very rushed. There was no chemistry between those who were "supposed" to be in love. None.
Ughhhh. Skip this one altogether.
This version should never have been made. The acting was incredibly horrible. Such.bad.acting.
I am SO disappointed. I adore all Jane Austen books. I HAVE all Jane Austen books. And the movies.
The man who plays Willoughby is soooo boring and dull.
And the women's clothes!!!!! We're like like...Whatttt??? They were not authentic at all, not in the least. Oh, be still my heart.
I do like the actor who plays Sir John Middleton. He did an adequate job.
The storyline felt very rushed. There was no chemistry between those who were "supposed" to be in love. None.
Ughhhh. Skip this one altogether.
This doesn't need to be compared to other versions, since it's Hallmark, that comes with a...hmm, stigma maybe? In other words, you know what you're getting.
As someone who loves Austen, I really liked this. The leads were great, particularly Elinor and Edward; some of the dialogue felt a bit modern if that makes sense, in that I didn't feel like it came directly from that era. But I feel like in general, most period pieces don't get it right 100% of the time.
Bottom line is, don't pay attention to the reviews or the ratings, whether you're a newbie or an Austen devotee. Just watch it for yourself and see what you think! Solid 6/10.
As someone who loves Austen, I really liked this. The leads were great, particularly Elinor and Edward; some of the dialogue felt a bit modern if that makes sense, in that I didn't feel like it came directly from that era. But I feel like in general, most period pieces don't get it right 100% of the time.
Bottom line is, don't pay attention to the reviews or the ratings, whether you're a newbie or an Austen devotee. Just watch it for yourself and see what you think! Solid 6/10.
6.2 stars.
The thought came to me about 10 minutes into the movie that if I want to watch Austen's 'Sense and Sensibility', I will simply revert back to the one and only that I've seen. This being about 29 years ago, and I was profoundly moved by that version. We all know I'm referring to the one with Thompson and Winslet. I don't particularly have any desire to ponder whether or not there's any other version to consider. The 1995 version was such perfection for me, it will be difficult justifying the allocation of my precious time to watching this one. I think Hallmark is being pretentious by creating another film based solely on the unadulterated novel itself. They should have added some twists and tweaks like they recently did with the pride and prejudice film. Trying to make an authentic remake of the original movie was a risky endeavor that did not pay off. I let the meter run for a good 30 to 40 minutes and realized this falls way flat. So I move onward to the next Hallmark film in my library. Cheerio.
The thought came to me about 10 minutes into the movie that if I want to watch Austen's 'Sense and Sensibility', I will simply revert back to the one and only that I've seen. This being about 29 years ago, and I was profoundly moved by that version. We all know I'm referring to the one with Thompson and Winslet. I don't particularly have any desire to ponder whether or not there's any other version to consider. The 1995 version was such perfection for me, it will be difficult justifying the allocation of my precious time to watching this one. I think Hallmark is being pretentious by creating another film based solely on the unadulterated novel itself. They should have added some twists and tweaks like they recently did with the pride and prejudice film. Trying to make an authentic remake of the original movie was a risky endeavor that did not pay off. I let the meter run for a good 30 to 40 minutes and realized this falls way flat. So I move onward to the next Hallmark film in my library. Cheerio.
Did you know
- TriviaAired as the last of four original films in The Hallmark Channel's 2024 "Loveuary" lineup, all of which were themed on the works of author Jane Austen, and the only one of which was actually based on one of her novels.
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content