A woman's picture-perfect life in quaint Holland, Michigan, crumbles when she and a friend uncover a twisted secret in their midst.A woman's picture-perfect life in quaint Holland, Michigan, crumbles when she and a friend uncover a twisted secret in their midst.A woman's picture-perfect life in quaint Holland, Michigan, crumbles when she and a friend uncover a twisted secret in their midst.
- Awards
- 1 win & 1 nomination total
Heather Marie Olsen
- Windmill Cafe Waitress
- (as Heather Olsen)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I was very excited to see this movie as I am a fan of Nicole Kidman and Garcia and thought the premise sounded very interesting.
The first and second act is rather slow to build up for a rather strange and bizarre third act that unfortunately fails to deliver on its shock twist.
The sad part is this film easily could've been a classic on the level of a Cohen Brothers or David Lynch, but instead it ends with some silly premises that are so far-fetched and a bloody ending that has so many plot holes, you scratch your head almost laughing.
Kudos to Nicole Kidman for taking a chance on this film as always she's trying something different and unique and carries the film with Garcia whose role is rather 2 dimensional but this film had no chance even with a great Director as this horrible script ends up being more like a b movie.
5 stars for actors/ director.
The first and second act is rather slow to build up for a rather strange and bizarre third act that unfortunately fails to deliver on its shock twist.
The sad part is this film easily could've been a classic on the level of a Cohen Brothers or David Lynch, but instead it ends with some silly premises that are so far-fetched and a bloody ending that has so many plot holes, you scratch your head almost laughing.
Kudos to Nicole Kidman for taking a chance on this film as always she's trying something different and unique and carries the film with Garcia whose role is rather 2 dimensional but this film had no chance even with a great Director as this horrible script ends up being more like a b movie.
5 stars for actors/ director.
Rating - 5.6:
Overall, a lackluster mystery thriller that Nicole Kidman cannot save because the movie does a bad job trying to subvert your expectations because it tries to lead you down a bad path when searching for the mystery, but the foreshadowing in the beginning and promotional material for this movie already give the conflict away; the movie genuinely feels like 20-30 minutes worth of scenes were cut because there was a lack of context throughout and the movie just feels unfinished towards the end.
Direction - Pretty Bad: The direction on a macroscale is pretty good, as it creates this mystery set in a society stuck in the past, like Holland, Michigan; the direction on a microscale is pretty good, mainly because the main cast is filled with experienced actors, especially Nicole Kidman; the storytelling holds the movie back because it intentionally leads you down the wrong path in the mystery they are trying to solve, and once the actual conflict is revealed, it does not provide any context or explanation for why it happens; they artificially create tension to make this movie a thriller, but not in a good way because it feels obviously forced
Story - Bad to Pretty Bad: The concept as a whole is pretty good as it presents a conflict across a perfect, stuck-in-time utopia like Holland, Michigan; but that conflict is pretty poor as it intentionally leads the audience down the wrong path to subvert its expectations; the plot structure is a big issue for this movie because the movie basically leads you down an adventure to figure out a mystery, but then when you find out what the actual mystery is, it basically just ends the movie without giving any context or closure; it genuinely feels like 20-30 minutes of this movie was cut because the movie feels unfinished, evidenced by Rachel Sennott's one scene and the ending; the character writing is what you would expect for a movie like this because it follows your vanilla housewife in a traditional family investigating her mysterious husband
Screenplay - Bad to Pretty Bad: The dialogue is decent and gives the actors something to work with; the humor is decent and helps lighten the mood; the symbolism is not really that good because the movie never really builds on anything or shares why certain plot elements are important; the foreshadowing is a big problem for this movie because the movie foreshadows what the actual conflict for this movie is overtly and very early in the movie, but then the movie foreshadows and goes down a different path throughout the movie; however, because you remember what the foreshadowing was early in the movie, plus the promotional material makes the conflict pretty obvious, it is not shocking at all when the real conflict is revealed, so you just feel like you wasted 40 minutes to get to this point
Acting - Pretty Good: Nicole Kidman - Good (Nicole Kidman can never give a bad performance; it shows here because she really embodies the character and makes the most of what she is given; she has good chemistry with Macfayden and Bernal), Matthew Macfadyen - Pretty Good (Basically plays Tom Wambsgans, but more mysteriously; he has good chemistry with Kidman), Gael García Bernal - Pretty Good (He has pretty good charisma and has good chemistry with Nicole Kidman), Rest of the cast - Decent (A bunch of minor supporting characters do a decent job supporting the main cast)
Score - Pretty Good: Helps create mystery and tension
Cinematography - Pretty Good: Feels polished
Editing - Decent: Feels polished; the cut for this movie feels a little unfinished
Sound - Decent: Helps create tension and suspense
Production Design - Pretty Good: Helps create Holland, Michigan, this stuck-in-time utopian city
Costumes - Pretty Good: Helps bring Holland, Michigan to life
Pacing - Pacing is fine up until the actual conflict is revealed; then the movie just feels very mismanaged and rushed to get to the finishing line; I genuinely think that 20-30 minutes of this movie was cut, and that was needed to help provide needed context
Climax - The climax is very lackluster, with the ending feeling unfinished
Tone - Tone is what one would expect from a mystery thriller;
Final Notes - Saw the second premiere at SXSW.
Direction - Pretty Bad: The direction on a macroscale is pretty good, as it creates this mystery set in a society stuck in the past, like Holland, Michigan; the direction on a microscale is pretty good, mainly because the main cast is filled with experienced actors, especially Nicole Kidman; the storytelling holds the movie back because it intentionally leads you down the wrong path in the mystery they are trying to solve, and once the actual conflict is revealed, it does not provide any context or explanation for why it happens; they artificially create tension to make this movie a thriller, but not in a good way because it feels obviously forced
Story - Bad to Pretty Bad: The concept as a whole is pretty good as it presents a conflict across a perfect, stuck-in-time utopia like Holland, Michigan; but that conflict is pretty poor as it intentionally leads the audience down the wrong path to subvert its expectations; the plot structure is a big issue for this movie because the movie basically leads you down an adventure to figure out a mystery, but then when you find out what the actual mystery is, it basically just ends the movie without giving any context or closure; it genuinely feels like 20-30 minutes of this movie was cut because the movie feels unfinished, evidenced by Rachel Sennott's one scene and the ending; the character writing is what you would expect for a movie like this because it follows your vanilla housewife in a traditional family investigating her mysterious husband
Screenplay - Bad to Pretty Bad: The dialogue is decent and gives the actors something to work with; the humor is decent and helps lighten the mood; the symbolism is not really that good because the movie never really builds on anything or shares why certain plot elements are important; the foreshadowing is a big problem for this movie because the movie foreshadows what the actual conflict for this movie is overtly and very early in the movie, but then the movie foreshadows and goes down a different path throughout the movie; however, because you remember what the foreshadowing was early in the movie, plus the promotional material makes the conflict pretty obvious, it is not shocking at all when the real conflict is revealed, so you just feel like you wasted 40 minutes to get to this point
Acting - Pretty Good: Nicole Kidman - Good (Nicole Kidman can never give a bad performance; it shows here because she really embodies the character and makes the most of what she is given; she has good chemistry with Macfayden and Bernal), Matthew Macfadyen - Pretty Good (Basically plays Tom Wambsgans, but more mysteriously; he has good chemistry with Kidman), Gael García Bernal - Pretty Good (He has pretty good charisma and has good chemistry with Nicole Kidman), Rest of the cast - Decent (A bunch of minor supporting characters do a decent job supporting the main cast)
Score - Pretty Good: Helps create mystery and tension
Cinematography - Pretty Good: Feels polished
Editing - Decent: Feels polished; the cut for this movie feels a little unfinished
Sound - Decent: Helps create tension and suspense
Production Design - Pretty Good: Helps create Holland, Michigan, this stuck-in-time utopian city
Costumes - Pretty Good: Helps bring Holland, Michigan to life
Pacing - Pacing is fine up until the actual conflict is revealed; then the movie just feels very mismanaged and rushed to get to the finishing line; I genuinely think that 20-30 minutes of this movie was cut, and that was needed to help provide needed context
Climax - The climax is very lackluster, with the ending feeling unfinished
Tone - Tone is what one would expect from a mystery thriller;
Final Notes - Saw the second premiere at SXSW.
Do we need to see Nicole Kidman even in her future late 70s in every movie? She's a fantastic actress, but not for every role. After her (unsuccessful) face lifting whatever, in fact face statufying procedure, she just cannot exteriorize every needed facial expressions in any required (active) role. So the script in 'Holland' was not the only faulty stuff here, the lead actor and actress, the husband and wife were with that little silly worm of a kid that needed a baseball bat hit straight to his face.
'Holland' needed someone like Kevin Spacey as the husband and a rebooted Rose Mcgowan as the wife.
Dave Delgado was tragically good as that lame thing and then and only then, the whole movie mumbo screenplay with that tragi-dark-comedy stuff would have worked.
Although, I agree that the ending is not even an ending, it's like a fairy tale princess drowning ending, but whatever and who cares with the things that I've explained earlier.
'Holland' needed someone like Kevin Spacey as the husband and a rebooted Rose Mcgowan as the wife.
Dave Delgado was tragically good as that lame thing and then and only then, the whole movie mumbo screenplay with that tragi-dark-comedy stuff would have worked.
Although, I agree that the ending is not even an ending, it's like a fairy tale princess drowning ending, but whatever and who cares with the things that I've explained earlier.
- Screenplay/storyline/plots: 5
- Production value/impact: 6.5
- Development: 6.5
- Realism: 4.5
- Entertainment: 4.5
- Acting: 6
- Filming/photography/cinematography: 6.5
- VFX: 7
- Music/score/sound: 6.5
- Depth: 5
- Logic: 2
- Flow: 4.5
- Psychology/mystery/drama/thriller: 5.5
- Ending: 3.
I was drawn to Holland because I liked Mimi Cave's work on Fresh quite a lot, so I figured, why not give this one a shot? Right from the start, though, I felt like I was watching a beautiful facade that slowly began to crumble. The movie sets up this idyllic suburban world that promises dark secrets lurking underneath, but it doesn't really deliver on that promise.
The screenplay is all over the place, disjointed, and full of abrupt plot turns that feel unearned. One minute you're settling into the slow burn of suburban perfection, and the next, bam, a twist that never had time to build up any real suspense. The tonal shifts between dark humor and suspense are jarring, and frankly, neither element is strong enough on its own to carry the movie. It's clear that the characters were meant to mirror the film's theme of artifice and hidden darkness, but aside from Nicole Kidman's Nancy, they're pretty underwritten. Kidman tries her best to hold everything together, and she does give a standout performance, yet her character doesn't have enough depth or substance to fully shine in a script that never really finds its footing.
There are some interesting ideas at play, like the notion of suburban perfection hiding a sinister underside. The use of the tulip imagery and all the Dutch-themed decor is visually stunning and adds to the unsettling beauty of the film. However, all that potential is let down by too many narrative gaps and twists that feel contrived. The theme of artifice, while promising, is never deeply explored, and it remains a surface-level idea. The pacing is another issue. The movie drags in some parts and then rushes through key moments in others, so it never really builds any proper tension.
Overall, its visual style and production design are definitely its strongest points, which capture an unsettling, almost beautiful atmosphere. But unfortunately, that style is bogged down by a poor script and uneven storytelling. Holland is a film with some bright flashes that, sadly, never come together as a cohesive whole.
The screenplay is all over the place, disjointed, and full of abrupt plot turns that feel unearned. One minute you're settling into the slow burn of suburban perfection, and the next, bam, a twist that never had time to build up any real suspense. The tonal shifts between dark humor and suspense are jarring, and frankly, neither element is strong enough on its own to carry the movie. It's clear that the characters were meant to mirror the film's theme of artifice and hidden darkness, but aside from Nicole Kidman's Nancy, they're pretty underwritten. Kidman tries her best to hold everything together, and she does give a standout performance, yet her character doesn't have enough depth or substance to fully shine in a script that never really finds its footing.
There are some interesting ideas at play, like the notion of suburban perfection hiding a sinister underside. The use of the tulip imagery and all the Dutch-themed decor is visually stunning and adds to the unsettling beauty of the film. However, all that potential is let down by too many narrative gaps and twists that feel contrived. The theme of artifice, while promising, is never deeply explored, and it remains a surface-level idea. The pacing is another issue. The movie drags in some parts and then rushes through key moments in others, so it never really builds any proper tension.
Overall, its visual style and production design are definitely its strongest points, which capture an unsettling, almost beautiful atmosphere. But unfortunately, that style is bogged down by a poor script and uneven storytelling. Holland is a film with some bright flashes that, sadly, never come together as a cohesive whole.
During the first hour everything was normal, but then the story picked up and I was hooked. Exceptional performance by Matthew Macfadyen especially. Love everything he does. An incredible actor.
Nicole was fantastic. I throughly enjoyed the movie.
Went in with low expectation, came out smiling.
I really enjoyed not knowing where the story was taking me. Very light and comedic tones for most of the film and then it takes a sharp turn with horror elements. Needless to say, I had a fun time with this.
One of those films where by the twist at the end, and thereby the conclusion, I said to myself, "Is that really it?"
Nicole was fantastic. I throughly enjoyed the movie.
Went in with low expectation, came out smiling.
I really enjoyed not knowing where the story was taking me. Very light and comedic tones for most of the film and then it takes a sharp turn with horror elements. Needless to say, I had a fun time with this.
One of those films where by the twist at the end, and thereby the conclusion, I said to myself, "Is that really it?"
2025 SXSW Film & TV Festival Cheat Sheet
2025 SXSW Film & TV Festival Cheat Sheet
Get the lowdown on the buzziest films we screened in Austin, including Jenna Ortega in Death of a Unicorn, the dark comedy Friendship, and more movies you'll want to add to your Watchlist.
Did you know
- TriviaMost of the scenes were not actually shot in Holland, Michigan; however the scene at the windmill was actually shot at Windmill Island in downtown Holland, which coincidentally is located right next to the actual Holland Amtrak station.
- GoofsWhen the husband falls off the dock and it splashes hard, the next seen panned out, the water is visibly undisturbed.
- Crazy creditsDuring the opening MGM logo, the roar of Leo the Lion, the studio's mascot, is silenced.
- ConnectionsFeatures Police Squad!: The Butler Did It (A Bird in the Hand) (1982)
- How long is Holland?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- Welcome to Holland
- Filming locations
- Nashville, Tennessee, USA(location)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 50 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content