Three Secrets

As luck would have it, I sat down to watch another movie from Maverick Entertainment. But truth be told, I sort of had guessed it to be, given the movie's cover. There is just something formulaic about the covers that Maverick Entertainment use for their movies, making it rather easy to discern.

And I have to say that I have very mixed luck with Maverick Entertainment, as the vast majority of their movies are questionable and dubious affairs, but I've stumbled upon two movies from the so far that have been quite impressive in comparison to the rest of their catalogue. So I have to say that I hoped that "Three Secrets" would be another movie that broke the standard of Maverick Entertainment.

The storyline in "Three Secrets" was okay. I mean, it was watchable, but it wasn't outstanding. But at least it was a notch up from the usual crap that Maverick Entertainment has been putting out, but it wasn't among their best of material neither. The movie starts out okay and is adequate up to about an hour into the runtime, where it sort of stagnates and becomes stale, so writer Kitt Johnson didn't really impress me.

I will say that directors Eric Huynh and Matthew Paul Smith actually managed to handle the intimacy scenes between the threesome nicely, as it could easily have slipped into something sleazy. But it never ventured down that path, so thumbs up to the directors for keeping it sober.

Of course I was not familiar with the cast ensemble in the movie, which is actually something that spoke in favor of the movie, as I do enjoy watching new and unfamiliar talents on the screen. The acting performances in the movie were actually fair.

"Three Secrets" is a watchable movie, for sure, but it is also a very forgettable movie.

My Rating of "Three Secrets" lands on a four out of ten stars.