User reviews

The Pilot has its ups and downs. It feels rushed more than anything else. There are good bits, interesting parts even, but they are short lived as everything seems to be moving so quick. Even the dialogue felt rushed at times, hard to keep track of, which makes even the great jokes ( and there are some in there ) hard to enjoy because of the pacing. It just feels like the story that took place in the pilot should have been spread out into about three episodes or so.

The plot is good, and the characters have lots of potential, but something just felt off for the entire duration of the first episode. While I absolutely do not want to compare this to the original series, and I would understand the creators wanting to try new things, I have to say that this just did not have the "Suits" vibe.

If the next few episodes slow things down a bit maybe we can get accustomed to the novel style of the series. I really have faith in Aaron Korsh and the cast and I believe Suits LA can achieve even greater heights than Suits.

Can't wait for the next episode.

Suits: LA had a rocky beginning, but by the time the final episode rolled around, it had started to show real promise-and left me genuinely wanting more. What began as a shaky spin-off slowly found its footing, revealing flashes of the sharp wit, character dynamics, and legal drama that made the original Suits such a hit. Unfortunately, it seems the show wasn't given enough room to grow, which is a shame considering how much potential it showed by the end.

One of the most noticeable issues with Suits: LA was its pacing in the early episodes. A significant amount of time was spent establishing backstories-sometimes at the expense of forward momentum. While understanding a character's motivations and past is important, the show leaned a little too heavily on exposition, bogging down the narrative and making it hard for viewers to fully connect with the present-day storylines. The main character's traumatic past, the firm's murky ethical history, and various unresolved issues were all introduced early on, but rather than being woven naturally into the plot, they were dumped in a way that felt more like catching up than storytelling.

That said, once the show started moving past the setup and into actual legal cases, it began to shine. The courtroom scenes became more engaging, the dialogue sharper, and the character interactions more authentic. There were clear attempts to recapture the clever banter and morally gray decisions that made Suits compelling, and at times, Suits: LA managed to hit those notes well. By the time the finale aired, the characters felt more grounded, and the storylines had more emotional weight and legal complexity.

Casting-wise, the show had potential. The lead brought a quieter intensity compared to Harvey Specter's bold charisma, which created a different but interesting tone. Supporting characters also began to come into their own, especially in the latter half of the season. You could sense the beginnings of strong chemistry between team members, and there were several subplot seeds that could have flourished if given more time.

The biggest disappointment isn't the show's rocky start-it's the decision to pull the plug just as things were improving. Canceling Suits: LA now feels premature. It's not uncommon for a spin-off series to take a few episodes-or even a full season-to hit its stride. Just look at how many shows go from mediocre beginnings to cult favorites once the writers find their rhythm and the actors settle into their roles. There's every reason to believe Suits: LA could have followed that same trajectory.

Rather than canceling the show outright, NBC (or whoever holds the rights) should strongly consider moving it to a streaming platform like Peacock. The original Suits saw a massive resurgence in popularity thanks to its availability on streaming, and Suits: LA could benefit from that same long-tail audience engagement. With the right marketing and a little patience, the show could build a loyal fan base. In fact, a slower-burn drama like this might thrive better in a binge-watch setting where viewers can stick with it long enough to see it improve.

In conclusion, while Suits: LA didn't come out of the gate with the same swagger as its predecessor, it was clearly evolving into something worthwhile. It deserved more time to develop, and it's frustrating to see that journey cut short just as it was getting interesting. Hopefully, this isn't the end for the Suits universe-because there's clearly more story to tell, and more viewers ready to watch it unfold.

Suits LA had the potential to build upon the legacy of Suits, but unfortunately, it struggles due to its rushed storytelling and lack of proper character development. From the very first episode, the show moves at an unnecessarily fast pace, failing to give audiences a chance to connect with the new characters or understand their backgrounds.

Unlike Suits, where characters were introduced gradually, allowing viewers to relate to their motivations, Suits LA throws a completely new set of characters into a new setting without any proper buildup. The audience is left wondering about their personalities, work ethics, and relationships. This rapid storytelling makes it difficult to feel invested in the plot.

If the show slows down and allows its characters to develop organically, it might stand a chance. Otherwise, it risks losing the charm that made the original series so popular.

Listen, this was never going to match the Suits pilot (few shows do).

And yes, Amell's character is the cocky alpha, but he's far less of a tosser than Harvey is in the first ep, so once you get that and the years of chemistry between the previous Suits cast out of your mind, this isn't a bad first episode.

Enough backstory for the.main character, with couple of good twists and generally a good cast.

I'm looking forward to seeing what happens next but it will be good to see more cohesion around storylines and actual legal cases as well as better chemistry between characters in the next episodes. Only two of the four main female characters were vaguely likeable though, so hopefully this will be addressed in the upcoming eps.

One episode in and all I could think was WTH is going on here! First, the "costumes" are ridiculous. The partner's hair and beard look like a bad Halloween custom. I couldn't watch him he looked so fake. Same with the father. Then, there was ZERO character development. It was very blocky, for a better term. One block here. Then another unrelated block. Then another unrelated block. It's like they tried to throw six seasons of the original Suits into one episode sans the good parts. No flow whatsoever. None. I found myself not even wanting to pay attention. At the end of the episode I had absolutely no vested interest in any of the characters. Not a single one was likable. Actually, I was relieved it was over. And the fun. What happened to the FUN? That was the whole Mike and Harvey thing ... Fun! And charm! And wit! None of that. The characters are robotic, tense and most definitely not enjoying themselves and I certainly did not enjoy them. Far from it. It was painful to watch.

I am writing this review after viewing just the pilot - so it is early days! I felt it necessary to contribute for the sake of perspective as most of the early scribes are quite bizarre - representing love or hate and very little in between. The truth simply has to be somewhere in the middle! It's too early for me to give an IMDb score after just one episode but I suspect it will probably turn out to be around "6". Possibly I will go higher or lower as I see how things progress. Nonethess, I think it was a solid start and before the haters accuse me of working on the show - I don't. Heck, I don't even live in the USA (or Canada)! Why the haters seem to imagine the reboot would be a carbon copy of the original baffles me - why would it be? Conversely, how can it be such an injustice to the orginal when both series were created by the same guy? Doesn't make sense! I liked the original but thought it lost its way towards the end. I was less impressed with "Pearson" despite being a fan of Gina Torres. This latest incarnation, to me, has had a little more time and thought spent on it. The production and cinematography were top notch and Stephen Amell is a great actor and well chosen for the part he plays which is substantially different from his time as the "Green Arrow". A lot is packed into the pilot that offers potential. I shall certainly be investing some time in the series as it might just be another hit. For my part, I am glad it is not a Carbon Copy - that would have been incredibly tedious.

I watched the original Suits. I decided to be open minded about Suits LA...in fact 30minutes into the pilot I needed to change the channel. Oh honestly it had nothing to do with comparing the shows then and now. Suits LA is boring and disappointing. I like Stephen Amel but his character in this series doesn't work. He is annoying...sorry!! The rest of the cast and their characters...well let's just say are weak.

Now if I were to compare this Suits LA to the original Suits. I would be happier watching the reruns. I know I sound harsh but I was so excited for the series and I just feel so disappointed.

This show feels oddly familiar, like something I've seen before that started with promise but quickly lost its appeal. Unfortunately, I just don't feel invested in it.

The original Suits had a unique charm, drawing us in with its engaging hooks. This series, however, misses the mark completely. The casting feels off, and where's the wit and charm? It's hard to find any here. The characters come off as cold and superficial, and while the acting is passable and the story could be interesting, there's no emotional connection to keep me watching. It feels like the only reason people are tuning in is because they're hoping for a Suits-like experience, but it's clear that something crucial is missing.

Honestly, if you're not going to capture the essence of Suits, maybe it's time to rethink the title. Change it to something more fitting, like Attorneys in LA or LA Legal-but don't call it Suits. That show had a magnetic quality that this one just doesn't replicate. I'll always love the original, and I hoped this series could bring something fresh to the table, but that's just not happening here.

This series seems destined for mediocrity, a short-lived run that will fade into obscurity.

I wish I had better news I LOVE the show Suits always will and only wish some new version of that same dynamic could make its way into my next favorite series.

I believe the formula for a successful show often includes a compelling hook, and one of the best examples of this was the character who could remember everything they ever read-pure genius. A concept like this would've done wonders for this series.

The lead character, exuding a level of masculinity that borders on toxic, was a perfect fit for the show's dynamic. What truly brought the show to life, though, was the redheaded assistant-so intelligent, she could easily run the entire operation. Her chemistry with the lead character was electric, adding depth to their interactions.

Then, there's the wildcard attorney-eccentric, with a love for mud baths and an oddball personality. Though he could be fiery, he had a charming, lovable side that balanced out his quirks. The "princess" character was another standout, offering more than just beauty-her potential for unexpected twists made her fascinating from the very start.

The writing was sharp and witty, with fast-paced editing that kept the energy high.

But Suits LA , Unfortunately, despite many of the right elements, the show just doesn't quite hit the mark. It feels like another series that will fade into obscurity. As a viewer, I can't help but think, "This should be better," but for now, I'll have to switch it off.

If you read the reviews, half of the people are upset because its too much like the old Suits and half are upset because its not enough like the old Suits.

It's a unique show that also shows the fast pace of top legal firms combined with the dirty things that go on behind the scenes...just like the original.

A crisis happens on in the first 24 hours of the show which I find compelling. At least one big unexpected twist keeps things interested.

Stephen Amell is brilliant. He's just not Harvey. But he's strong, witty, flawed, in his unique ways. He also has very unique family dynamics which make his character unique.

The Pro Bono attorney and Erika serve as two strong female leads. Neither one of them is a Donna or Rachel and looking at them that way does a disservice.

The Los Angeles focus has a lot of potential in terms of the crazy storylines that originate from the entertainment industry.

The reviews would probably be a lot higher if they didn't call it Suits Los Angeles but I'm sure they'll make more money and get more ratings out or it than if they didn't .

It's got a wise old man, a brother with downs syndrome, miserably corny writing, Stephen Amell and some other pretty faces. There was a scene where this guy said "Have you ever taken an acting class?" to Stephen's character. It was the best joke I've heard all day. There's also Eobard Thawne, who is the arrow's dad.

If the writing was a bit less painful, I might've continued watching this. I may or may not put it up for background noise as I did with the original Suits. It pales in comparison to the original which got repetitive after a few seasons.

This is gonna be a guilt watch whenever I do come back to this, I would not recommend at all though.

The great thing about suits is right off the bat you get invested in these two men's lives. They let you in on a secret and we gotta keep it with them. The characters are built slowly and evenly throughout the show giving us their backstory through multiple episodes over the decade long run. We rooted for the characters from the word go. What about suits La is making me like the characters? Nothing. There is no banter, no fun, no quirky ness, no chemistry. Ted isn't as charismatic and there is no protege we care about. I dunno man it's a completely different show. It's a law show sure. But it's not SUITS. There is literally NOTHING in common between these two shows. If I was to was ncis and ncis la there are differences but the core is the same. FBI and fbi international, csi and csi Miami. The core is the same but not here. They just aren't the same. And you know what? Not loving it. I'll keep watching to give it a fair shot. But ya this is the worse spin off show I've watched. Couldn't they have at least picked one of the lawyers we already met? Scottie for example?

I do think Ted Black could work on his acting a bit to not try be like Harvey, sort of like Pierce Brosnan didn't try be his own bond. But otherwise I'm really enjoying the show and the tone of it, versus shows like Better Call Saul, which was technically better but I'm enjoying this more because it's less dark and less full of crude behaviours and ideals.

I will say I did skip to episode 4 to see what it would be like with Harvey in it and see if the show progressed and that certainly helped it be more palatable and now I'm enjoying watching it. But after only watching episode one I actually thought I wasn't going to watch it

So, lowering expectations and just watching it for what it is has led me to really enjoy it and I hope that there will be more episodes and that it will grow into its own show, holding the suits tone, fun, comedy, and family themes but developing into its own show.

My husband and I found the original Suits while on vacation in Italy. Netflix over there had it before they did here in the States. We were hooked from the first episode. As another reviewer said, we were in on a secret between two main characters. It had it all-characters who grew, secrets and lies, and humor, which is such a rare commodity these days.

There is no hook to Suits LA. Nothing that draws the viewer in from the get-go. Too many characters all at once and not enough depth. The 2010 backstory was good, but it got drawn out all season. What was going to be the focus in the future?

They try to duplicate the original too much. Ted is just Harvey and despite their interactions, you can't have two Batmen.

It's really too bad. This is the second spin off of Suits to fail, so I doubt anyone will pay for a third. It's too bad because we enjoyed all three series.

But Suits OG just had it all. Korsh needs to try something besides a lawyer show, perhaps, but start off with a hook that keeps on pulling. Suits LA just didn't. It showed sparks and I wish they'd had a second season to flesh out more, but TV is not very forgiving and doesn't give many chances.

So they've opened a can of (very, very) beautiful women, gave the Green Arrow a lawyer degree and that Stuart character the most hideous beard in beard history but then forgot to write a descent storyline that would create the same kinda magic the original version of the show did? I'm not comparing it with Suits but if it carries the name at least it should remind to its big brother/sister... It also lacks chemistry between the characters...

And pls, Stuart, pls shave that ugly thing you call a beard off... or don't glue it back on the next shootingday... You look like Zack Morris from Saved by the Bell in a school play...

UNDERSTAND THAT THIS SHOW IS NOT A SEQUEL TO SUITS. ITS JUST A SHOW THAT IS SET IN THE SAME UNIVERSE.

I've read countless reviews and comments that mention something about the original Suits.. This show is a standalone that is set in the same universe and doesn't have to be anything remotely like 'Suits'. (not everything has to be like the MCU lmao)

Give the show a chance, let it be its own thing & I'm willing to bet you enjoy it. I did rate it a 7 but considering I have 'Suits' rated a 9, so far a 7 for Suits LA is solid. I'm probably more on the 6.5 side but we will see with time. There is so much potential and the fact that there has only been 6 episodes and people are destroying this. So much room for character development still to happen. Just trust me, go into it and don't expect it to be like 'Suits' and you'll be hooked by episode 3.

The only thing Suits LA has in common with the original Suits is the theme song and profession. The actors and plots are boring. There's no magic, humor, witty banter, or sassy walk and talks. No real courtroom drama. Sadly, there's no reason to watch other than Gabriel Macht's upcoming appearance. But even he can't save this one. You have to wonder if the writers even watched the original. It left me wanting to binge it. When Suits became the most streamed show of all time, most of the original cast expressed interest in returning for a reboot. You have to wonder why more of them aren't in Suits LA. They were worth the extra money.

Seems like they dropped 15 characters into the proverbial glass law office, and said, "Go!" Things and people jumped around so fast you can't get attached. And I don't like the show if I can't connect with the primary characters. Taylor Sheridan knows how it's done. While they are attempts at cute banter, it's over played. Alice Lea (Leah) over acts, Josh McDermott needs to dump the beard and someone should buy Steven Arielle a suit, even in L. A. and for those looking for a link back to the "real" Suits, nothing but the music. Makes me wish even one or 2 old characters had moved out to LA so you wold have something to hold on to.

I watched the Original Suits and I loved it, there were some moments that didn't work out, but it is still a phenomenal show. Suits LA was a show I had some skepticism going in, but I found myself really enjoying it.

Positives for Suits LA (2025): This show does a great job at recreating the feel of the original for the old fans while also changing up the plot to make things a little bit different. Now, it does take a while for the plot to kick into high gear, but thankfully the show kicks a lot of ass when that happens. Then, you have the cast and they were all awesome with Stephen Amell, Lex Scott Davis, Josh McDermitt and Bryan Greenberg. It was also great to see Gabriel Macht and Rick Hoffman show up a couple of times to bring some nostalgia for the old fans. There are a number of guest stars who show up with my favorite being Victoria Justice and that's coming from my inner Nickelodeon fandom. The court case are fun and will have you on the edge of your seats just like in the original. And finally, I liked when the first season ends on a note that feel satisfying for new fans to be excited for a Season 2.

Mixed for Suits LA (2025): The fact this show got cancelled is going to be a big bummer for some fans and I was a little bit sad about that. But there is a part of me that is kind of happy since it could mean Season 3 of Heels on Netflix could happen especially when the finale has Mike O'Malley show up as a guest star.

Negatives for Suits LA (2025): It was incredibly misguided by Universal and NBC to greenlight this show just because of the success it had on Netflix and it obviously backfired on them big time.

Overall, Suits LA (2025) was a fantastic spin-off to Suits (2011-2019) and while it sucks to see this show gone now, the road was fun.

After the first three episodes I'm still waiting for that one attention grabbing episode! This series has too much seriousness and not enough small witty comebacks. Even the first episode of the original series had just enough to consume my undivided attention. I have watched the original series completely 14 times and it never gets old. Suits L. A. I understand is not the original or a continuation but it's lacking the vibes. There's no Dana like character or a Luis type of character, and both of those created their own side stories within the series. This series is supposed to be based on a law firm dealing with the film industry, however, there hasn't been much of that in detail intertwined with the the overall concept of the show. I'm hopeful for a second season but at this point, especially if theirs not many episodes in season one, it's going to take a lot to attract the audience from the original series.

Is it only me or are they trying to recreate the same characters from the original?

Aside from the similar personalities, really the same 4 star characters recreated?

Ted acts like Harvey, Erika acts like Rachel And Rick acts like Mike.

I love the actors but the similarities killed it for me to enjoy this series.

I agree with what the others are saying, no buildup to the story and characters background is a miss, I'm lost trying to rap my head around going back and forth to year 2010, even Harvey appearance seems out of place like they just wanted people to love it forcefully which ruined the whole plot.

So for the most part the series was great. I understand the backstory, but it went on too long. The acting was also great for the most part. Josh McDermitt was the weakest link. Had they removed his character I think the show would have been top notch. As long as they stayed in the current time.

I liked how they had real actors playing themselves and they wrote them into the show. Made it feel more real.

I liked the Eddie storyline, but they needed to end it once they finished off that story or they could have just made a single past story episode.

Hopefully they can find a way to bring back the story and salvage it. I think Stephen Amell played his character great. The rest of the cast was great too. The more episodes went on the better the character chemistry built and developed.

10 Episodes wasn't long enough for trial.

Let me start by saying that I am sad that this is cancelled. The last few episodes got good and showed some huge promise. That said, at about episode 3 it was pretty obvious it was going to get the axe.

Like the original, this was a character driven show first and not a procedural. Unlike the original, it tried running from the get go. We the audience were hit with so many characters and only some of the background. In my opinion, the show should have started with more of Stuart and Ted and their history. That was some of the best parts; seeing why these 2 felt like brothers.

The immediate backstab was a bad start to the show I think. That would have been a great cliff hanger for season one after we learned to love all the characters.

By the end, I liked the dynamic between Ted and Stuart. Throw in some more Kevin and the brotherhood trio would be a great comic relief to any seriousness that they could bring. Mike and Harvey going head to head was great to watch in the original and could have been the same here without following the same pattern I feel. We will never know.

What were they thinking? Well ok, you want to continue the story, but give the viewers some credit, you don't have make a carbon copy of the last one right down to the camera view points and dramatic poses.

This really does watch like kids at a school play pretending to act as their teachers. And to make matter worse the first episode of is a total rehash of an old one but with less leaning to logic and legal facts.

I can't see this lasting long, it's so plastic and fake ... no wait perhaps it'll be a big hit with today's audience who seem only to want flashing eyes and deceit.

This is best missed.

I love the fact they aren't trying to replicate anything which was done in Suits and they are creating a completely new character - Ted Black with a different range of dynamics and personality when compared to Harvey which I believe would be a good thing for the show in the long run. This show is more darker even though the cases are set on the entertainment industry and I love that stark contrast. I believe Stephen Amell's character is well layered with an inherent sense of humanity which he gotta bask a little, due to the nature of maintaining a sharp image as a cut-throat layer. All the other characters are also shaping out well with Erica, Rick and all the other characters and let's give them time to see how well they hold over the rest of the episodes. I'm also waiting for Harvey to show up in the upcoming episodes and it'll be interesting to know about Ted Black's past with Harvey and how he ties up to the fray. I think Aaron Korsch is gonna create an amazing tv show with Stephen. Only one suggestion for the time being is to add an amazing theme song to the show like Suits had the Greenback Booger.

Update after seeing all the episodes: Ted Black as a protagonist doesn't feel as compelling or as interesting as Harvey and Mike did in Suits. His character felt a bit timid and not vibrant and the aura that's supposed to be emanating from a badass LA lawyer like him is not there. And the character's connections and their motives also doesn't hook you. I thought it will improve towards the end of the season but it didn't . Henceforth, I've lowered my rating.