Minister Henriksson vanishes in Järva, Sweden's biggest hazardous no-go area surrounded by walls. Imprisoned fighter Emir offered freedom to find her.Minister Henriksson vanishes in Järva, Sweden's biggest hazardous no-go area surrounded by walls. Imprisoned fighter Emir offered freedom to find her.Minister Henriksson vanishes in Järva, Sweden's biggest hazardous no-go area surrounded by walls. Imprisoned fighter Emir offered freedom to find her.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
A Disaster Without Direction
Some series feel like they should never have been approved. Paradis City is one of them. What's the story here? Is there even a script? The series is based on Jens Lapidus' novel, but the screen adaptation seems to have lost all sense of structure, emotion, and substance. The result is a confused, half-baked mess that fails to capture the tension and themes hinted at in the original material.
Direction Without Purpose
Why was he chosen? What has he done before? And more importantly-does he even know how to build suspense? Because here, there is none. The show lacks any sense of dramatic buildup, pacing, or an understanding of the social critique that should be its core.
Disastrous Casting and Acting
For a story to work, the characters need to feel alive. Here, the opposite is true. Alexander Abdallah, who is supposed to carry the show, delivers a performance so flat and uninspired that it becomes embarrassing. His portrayal makes you long for Snabba Cash, where he at least had some impact. But it's not just him-every single actor feels misplaced and uninterested. It's as if no one truly understands why they're there.
Did They Even Understand Their Own Premise?
The central theme of the series-segregation and social exclusion-should be its driving force. Instead, it seems to have been reduced to a visual gimmick. They build a wall, show it, and then... what? Did they think that was enough? There's no real exploration of how this dystopian vision affects society. The audience never gets to feel the social tensions or experience the consequences of this world. It's a glaring oversight.
Conclusion: Medellín 2.0
To quote Ari Gold's infamous review of Medellín in Entourage: "Paradis City was awful, and Alexander Abdallah was awful in it." This is a textbook example of what happens when you fail to understand the source material, direct with a clear vision, and cast the right actors. It's not just a bad show-it's one of the worst Swedish productions in recent years.
Who approved this? That's the biggest question of all.
Some series feel like they should never have been approved. Paradis City is one of them. What's the story here? Is there even a script? The series is based on Jens Lapidus' novel, but the screen adaptation seems to have lost all sense of structure, emotion, and substance. The result is a confused, half-baked mess that fails to capture the tension and themes hinted at in the original material.
Direction Without Purpose
Why was he chosen? What has he done before? And more importantly-does he even know how to build suspense? Because here, there is none. The show lacks any sense of dramatic buildup, pacing, or an understanding of the social critique that should be its core.
Disastrous Casting and Acting
For a story to work, the characters need to feel alive. Here, the opposite is true. Alexander Abdallah, who is supposed to carry the show, delivers a performance so flat and uninspired that it becomes embarrassing. His portrayal makes you long for Snabba Cash, where he at least had some impact. But it's not just him-every single actor feels misplaced and uninterested. It's as if no one truly understands why they're there.
Did They Even Understand Their Own Premise?
The central theme of the series-segregation and social exclusion-should be its driving force. Instead, it seems to have been reduced to a visual gimmick. They build a wall, show it, and then... what? Did they think that was enough? There's no real exploration of how this dystopian vision affects society. The audience never gets to feel the social tensions or experience the consequences of this world. It's a glaring oversight.
Conclusion: Medellín 2.0
To quote Ari Gold's infamous review of Medellín in Entourage: "Paradis City was awful, and Alexander Abdallah was awful in it." This is a textbook example of what happens when you fail to understand the source material, direct with a clear vision, and cast the right actors. It's not just a bad show-it's one of the worst Swedish productions in recent years.
Who approved this? That's the biggest question of all.
I was genuinely excited to start watching this series because of all the hype in Sweden. Unfortunately, after six episodes, I'm left disappointed. While the visuals are undeniably stunning and the premise had the potential to be fantastic, the execution leaves much to be desired. It's evident that a significant budget went into the production, but it's wasted on a story that feels disjointed and underwhelming.
The tone of the series feels oddly off, almost as if it's torn between wanting to be mature and gritty, but ending up coming across as juvenile and simplistic. Some scenes are so unrealistic that they take you completely out of the experience. Dialogue is another weak point; it's awkward and unnatural, especially when characters who are supposed to be hardened criminals sound more like teenagers playing dress-up.
What's even more frustrating is the script, which feels outdated and riddled with clichés. It's as though the writer relied heavily on stereotypes and preconceived notions rather than crafting believable, multi-dimensional characters. The result is a story that lacks depth and fails to resonate.
In the end, the series falls flat despite its glossy exterior. There's a sense of wasted potential that's hard to ignore, and the disconnect between what it could have been and what it actually is makes it all the more disappointing.
The tone of the series feels oddly off, almost as if it's torn between wanting to be mature and gritty, but ending up coming across as juvenile and simplistic. Some scenes are so unrealistic that they take you completely out of the experience. Dialogue is another weak point; it's awkward and unnatural, especially when characters who are supposed to be hardened criminals sound more like teenagers playing dress-up.
What's even more frustrating is the script, which feels outdated and riddled with clichés. It's as though the writer relied heavily on stereotypes and preconceived notions rather than crafting believable, multi-dimensional characters. The result is a story that lacks depth and fails to resonate.
In the end, the series falls flat despite its glossy exterior. There's a sense of wasted potential that's hard to ignore, and the disconnect between what it could have been and what it actually is makes it all the more disappointing.
The wide opening shot of a wall surrounding the troubled suburbs of Stockholm in a near future gives the viewer hope - this could be interesting.
But... unfortunately, from that and onwards it's a fall into an amateurish abyss. Absolutely nothing is exciting, original or ever poignant. Instead the writing, directing and overall production is closer to a B or even C movie.
The overall look is especially poor - absolutely no atmosphere whatsoever.
And what exactly is the plot?!
I hope the book is better, because whoever wrote this adaption has little understanding of building a suspenseful narrative.
And it feels so low budget in comparison - but with more talented filmmakers one could have achieved a far more visual dystopian look. Budget or not.
For example, staging a scene where the prime minister is holding a speech in front of an angry crowd, a mob - is no small feat. You need resources or a talent for cheating - well. Here it comes off as a children's show.
If you want to have a "bad guy" as your protagonist - please do better. Make him more interesting. Not paper thin, cliché and moronic - just acting tough. Remember Snake Plissken?!
But... unfortunately, from that and onwards it's a fall into an amateurish abyss. Absolutely nothing is exciting, original or ever poignant. Instead the writing, directing and overall production is closer to a B or even C movie.
The overall look is especially poor - absolutely no atmosphere whatsoever.
And what exactly is the plot?!
I hope the book is better, because whoever wrote this adaption has little understanding of building a suspenseful narrative.
And it feels so low budget in comparison - but with more talented filmmakers one could have achieved a far more visual dystopian look. Budget or not.
For example, staging a scene where the prime minister is holding a speech in front of an angry crowd, a mob - is no small feat. You need resources or a talent for cheating - well. Here it comes off as a children's show.
If you want to have a "bad guy" as your protagonist - please do better. Make him more interesting. Not paper thin, cliché and moronic - just acting tough. Remember Snake Plissken?!
It's frightening near-future series that feels very relevant given the increasing gang crime in Sweden. This is a nightmare that doesn't feel unrealistic. It's a good serie and a moderately political action thriller. Even though there are some clichès, Paradise City is exciting and worth applauding. Stylish and fast-paced with impressive settings. The performance are generally as well. The serie "Snabba Cash" is also based on a book by Jens Lapidus, which was slightly better, but this one is more than worth watching. Six episodes feel perfect as it allows the pace to be maintained. I've watched 4 episodes and can hardly wait for the next one.
Yes it's not a masterpiece, but it isn't a total piece of trash either. 4.8/10 is WAY too harsh.
If you like realistic shows, then this is not for you. You have to set your mind to a different environment. After that, everything becomes easier. I personally enjoy a good political/conspiracy/spy thriller so I liked this.
The plot of the series without spoiling anything is basically: 2 political parties exist in Sweden. The one who wants a progressive society and the one who wants things to remain as they are, meaning no go zones where people considered as second class citizens live there and can't escape because there's a big wall that divides them from the rest of the country (reminds me of something..) An important member of the progressive party goes to that zone to hold a speech, protected by secret service agent Fredrika and a bunch of others. Things go south and that member gets kidnapped. Fredrika teams up with a citizen of that no go zone for reasons I can't spoil in order to find that party member. Conspiracies, lies, betrayals are essential parts of the plot. The 2 main actors do a great job.
Of course the show has its flaws. Sometimes it can get a little bit confusing, sometimes I had to pause and go back to the previous episodes to remember how we got there. Some important stuff that I couldn't understand because I could have missed that part. But I think you'll be good if you're up for a short binge watch (or even split it into two days). I also didn't necessarily enjoy Emir's wife storyline. That was the weakest sub plot of the series and it wasn't needed IMO. It added nothing at the end of the day. I was also a little disappointed by the finale, but that's just a personal opinion. It was disappointing but very realistic.
So, if you like something different, and you're up for political games, then give this show a try it's only 6 episodes, even if you watch an episode a day you'll be done in less than a week. Certainly don't be discouraged by the ratings here.
7.5/10.
If you like realistic shows, then this is not for you. You have to set your mind to a different environment. After that, everything becomes easier. I personally enjoy a good political/conspiracy/spy thriller so I liked this.
The plot of the series without spoiling anything is basically: 2 political parties exist in Sweden. The one who wants a progressive society and the one who wants things to remain as they are, meaning no go zones where people considered as second class citizens live there and can't escape because there's a big wall that divides them from the rest of the country (reminds me of something..) An important member of the progressive party goes to that zone to hold a speech, protected by secret service agent Fredrika and a bunch of others. Things go south and that member gets kidnapped. Fredrika teams up with a citizen of that no go zone for reasons I can't spoil in order to find that party member. Conspiracies, lies, betrayals are essential parts of the plot. The 2 main actors do a great job.
Of course the show has its flaws. Sometimes it can get a little bit confusing, sometimes I had to pause and go back to the previous episodes to remember how we got there. Some important stuff that I couldn't understand because I could have missed that part. But I think you'll be good if you're up for a short binge watch (or even split it into two days). I also didn't necessarily enjoy Emir's wife storyline. That was the weakest sub plot of the series and it wasn't needed IMO. It added nothing at the end of the day. I was also a little disappointed by the finale, but that's just a personal opinion. It was disappointing but very realistic.
So, if you like something different, and you're up for political games, then give this show a try it's only 6 episodes, even if you watch an episode a day you'll be done in less than a week. Certainly don't be discouraged by the ratings here.
7.5/10.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content