[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Indigenous (2014)

User reviews

Indigenous

65 reviews
5/10

Predictable and mediocre venture to the jungle

Indigenous offers the well-known concept of lost tourists on an exotic location where they meet hostile entity. It highly resembles other fiction movies or even miniseries from Discovery channel. To its credit, it gives nice visual of the setting and there is effort to produce horror, but ultimately it is a straightforward and tired endeavor.

The story might work to its advantage as audience gets exactly what they expect. There's little diversity here, even in recent year there are several movies with same theme. A few college kids take vacation in a beautiful place, and then they are inexplicably going to ominous site even though there are plenty of visible warnings.

Visual is pretty good, the use of location is commendable, although when the encounter happens during nighttime, it reverts to jittery cam. The movie is shot mostly on third person, so it shouldn't encounter this issue like many mockumentary movies. Fortunately, the practical effect works well and it doesn't shy away from displaying the monster instead of maintaining blurry shots.

Script does what it needs to, though surprisingly the actors perform admirably. They mostly look genuine, either through occasionally adequate presentation of the horror or the acting itself. In latter half, the movie opts for different gimmick and tries to broaden the scale, a decent effort but not entirely novel.

Indigenous is exactly one would expect from lost tourist horror theme, it's far from innovative, but it might just be sufficient in the small scope.
  • quincytheodore
  • Jul 6, 2015
  • Permalink
4/10

WHO ELSE KNOWS THIS?

  • nogodnomasters
  • May 19, 2018
  • Permalink
5/10

There has to be a logical explanation to all of this.

Aahh, horror and all that it comes with it. Same lines, same plot, same surroundings, same reactions and last but not least, same characters.

Still, a far better production than say, Animal, easily two steps down compared to The Descent, overall, an OK movie, for a night with the friends. While most of it was easily anticipated and had the same moves every horror has for the last 20 years, it managed to act OK, and keep you there, in front of the screen without leaving it too soon or skipping forward. Don't expect anything decent, little below it, but below indeed.

Anyway monster horrors are my favorite, so for me it was nice seeing one more. But I wouldn't recommend it to everyone out there. Maybe try The Cave, or The Ruins instead. Those are more likely to impress.

Cheers!
  • Patient444
  • Feb 20, 2016
  • Permalink
3/10

Panama looks good, but this retread of The Descent is very dull

  • Leofwine_draca
  • Jul 17, 2016
  • Permalink
1/10

Just like The Descent........but terrible

  • FlashCallahan
  • Sep 16, 2015
  • Permalink
1/10

Terrible

This is an amazingly dreadful movie. Starts off looking like a pretty good C-Grade movie and some fun in the jungle with an unknown beast. That's what it is, but most of the time we run around with a flashlight, screams from the humans and screeches from the beast. We hardly see the beast and have no feelings towards the humans (like who cares if they die). Avoid this one, no joke.
  • rogapol
  • Jun 29, 2020
  • Permalink
1/10

This movie is a total torture to watch....

  • degeneratekid
  • Apr 2, 2016
  • Permalink
1/10

I have never been more angry after seeing a film.

  • bcemmert
  • Sep 7, 2018
  • Permalink
7/10

Unexpectedly Good

What happens when you put low-budget, unfamiliar actors, and horror movie together? Usually something really bad. However, that was not the case with this movie. It was incredibly entertaining. Unlike many horror films that are made on the cheap, this was very well acted and directed.

The monster was actually shown. Unlike as often is the case in low-budget horror films where the monster looks like someone who's simply wearing a Halloween mask, the creature in this was very well crafted. It kind of resembled the monsters from The Descent, except this monster could see, and it had raptor-like teeth.

The scenery, primarily a jungle, is always a fun atmosphere, because the forest is like the ocean; both entirely different worlds unto themselves.

For anyone who likes movies like the aforementioned Descent, I highly recommend this movie. It's not as good as Descent, but come on that was a highly original movie. However, if you liked that, you should like this.

I gave this a 7-star rating. It's about time I found a horror film that was good. I've seen so many that stink out loud. Again, I recommend this to all those who are horror movie junkies.
  • chrismackey1972
  • Jun 23, 2015
  • Permalink
1/10

Nothing new, nothing to like.

  • william_morris
  • Jul 5, 2015
  • Permalink
8/10

Worth your time, high quality for low budget

I'm not really a horror fan so when get ready to watch one I read some best and worst reviews on the movie to lower or raise my expectations. With this one the reviews were around 50/50 but not a lot of users. So I took the chance, watched it and will give my 2 cents. First of all, I was entertained and not bored a single minute. For that I would already rate above 5. The unknown actors almost seem to "grow" both in their role and performance as the movie progresses. Pretty decent performance, job well done. The setting, fear and tension are convincing as well as the reactions of the characters. The monster is realistic although it does look like a monster type of the descent movies like someone said earlier. All in all, it's a nice popcorn & beer movie to watch with your girlfriend to get a nice scare.
  • srmeewisse
  • Jun 27, 2015
  • Permalink
7/10

A Brand New Horror Movie with a Twist

We've seen tons of horror films from the past filled with clichés like foreign tourists who dares to travel in an unknown place despite warnings from locals due to hidden horrors. Unlike The Blair Witch Project, this one is quite self-aware rather than preventing mystical legend of "Chupacabra" from outside world. True story: a day after watching Furious 7, I was curious about this low-budget horror film thanks to its dark background poster. Therefore, I decided to watch it alone with few audiences inside a theater. Surprisingly, while it has flaws ranging from typical horror clichés to few shortcomings, Indigenous scares me but not too much. While the entire cast is new, their acting is spot-on. Also, there's no sign of any CGI effects, only practical ones. Overall, I recommend everyone to watch this rare gem.
  • yomi_15
  • Apr 12, 2015
  • Permalink
2/10

Indigenous is an insipid piece of junk

Takes half the movie until anything horror-ish even start to happen and then it takes an additional 15 minutes until we actually get a look of the creatures that are suppose to be the main attraction of the movie.

And although they look reasonably creepy, it just isn't enough to save the movie and for the more-part they aren't really anywhere to be seen, occasionally because they are a bit away but mostly because of shaky camera work and the fact that they seem to do most their work at night-time.

The characters are also dull one-tracked party hardy boys and girls with little likability factor to them, which doesn't help.

So yeah really not recommended, unless you are one of the few people who liked 'ANIMAL (2014)' cause that's similar to this. And that was also terrible.
  • Seth_Rogue_One
  • May 26, 2016
  • Permalink
2/10

Indigestible.

  • tmccull52
  • Jul 30, 2021
  • Permalink
1/10

Don't bother.

  • ricksrealfb
  • Jul 4, 2015
  • Permalink
1/10

More idiot Americans in the jungle.

  • doorsscorpywag
  • Jun 24, 2015
  • Permalink
3/10

For every 'Descent' there's going to be a dozen movies like this!

  • stevenrotherforth
  • May 5, 2020
  • Permalink
5/10

Chupacabras in the Panamanian jungle

RELEASED IN 2014 and directed by Alastair Orr, "Indigenous" covers events in Panama when five college-age youths vacation there for some fun in the sun. Things go awry when they visit a beautiful waterfall in a forbidden area of the jungle.

This is a professionally made monster-in-the-forest flick with a competent no-name cast highlighted by gorgeous Panamanian locations and winsome Laura Penuela in a bikini. Precious Lindsey McKeon is another highlight on the female front.

My only problems are that (1.) the plot's hackneyed, particularly bringing to mind "The Last Tribe" (2009), which is marginally better in some ways. Other flicks come to mind, like "Touristas" (2007) and "The Ruins" (2008), which are superior to the other two. (2.) There's no depth in the plot: This is a monster movie focusing on partying youths getting chased in the forest by savage creatures and that's it. As such, the film's not very compelling despite the horror and thrills. On the bright side, the last act throws in an unexpected curve ball and shows that the movie wasn't micro-budget. Another positive is that this is arguably the best and most realistic chupacabra flick out there (keeping in mind that I've only seen four such movies).

Speaking of which, 'chupacabra' is a Spanish word, which literally means "goat-sucker" (from chupar "to suck" and cabra "goat"). There are two varieties of this cryptozoological beast: (1.) a reptile-like creature with leathery/scaly greenish-gray skin and sharp spines or quills running down its back; and (2.) a hairless form of canine with a pronounced spinal ridge and prominent eye sockets, fangs, and claws. "Indigenous" interestingly features neither of these, although the creatures come closer to the first description, I suppose.

THE MOVIE RUNS 1 hour 26 minutes was shot in Panama. WRITER: Max Roberts.

GRADE: B-/C+ (5.5/10)
  • Wuchakk
  • Jan 15, 2018
  • Permalink
6/10

Decent enough creature feature if still problematic

  • kannibalcorpsegrinder
  • May 9, 2016
  • Permalink
1/10

Extremely ridiculous

  • letangrules
  • Aug 30, 2018
  • Permalink
9/10

Very Watchable

For a low budget, Indigenous works out really well. The movie moved along at a nice pace, the characters were all very natural, and could act their parts with conviction (something usually lacking in low budget films).

The plot was quite good, based around the idea of a group of young tourists a bit bored with the standard fare on offer at the beach resort. They are told of a wonderful waterfall, deep in the jungle, but are also warned about the danger lurking there... blood thirsty beasts, the Chupacabra.

Yes, young folks make stupid choices all the time, nevermind how many warnings about the risks. So off this group go to find the find of their lives, an isolated and idyllic waterfall deep in the jungle.

The action begins not long after reaching the waterfall & pool. When night falls, character by character are in grave danger of being picked off by the Chupacabra. These actual creatures looked really good too. Plus the blood & gore was realistic.

As this type of movie goes, I'd say it's well worth a watch.
  • keitharmstrong-17620
  • Jul 27, 2015
  • Permalink
6/10

Decent Watch!

These reviews are too critical; chances are if you have come across this movie as a suggestion, you like creature features. The creature is actually scary looking such as in the cave. It's nice imagery and entertaining. Yes it's low budget poor acting blah blah blah but it's not some stupid creature feature, I recommend watching!
  • smarieupchurch
  • Jul 2, 2022
  • Permalink
3/10

Why not just call it "The Descent 3"?

  • ftownsend-96013
  • Feb 4, 2018
  • Permalink
4/10

A Low Budget "Lost In The Jungle With A Monster Chasing You" Flick.

Below mediocre, thoroughly amateurish attempt making a survival horror film in the jungles of Panama. The film is about a group of friends who decide to explore an impenetrable area called the Darién Gap.

The Darién Gap (Spanish: Región del Darién or Tapón del Darién) is a break in the Pan-American Highway consisting of a large swath of undeveloped swampland and forest within Panama's Darién Province in Central America and the northern portion of Colombia's Chocó Department in South America.

Having learned from a friend about a beautiful waterfall in that area, which has a pool very good to swim in, they decide to undertake an expedition despite the friend's warning about a vicious creature that inhabits the area. This creature, the Chupacabra, is thought to be an evil spirit inhabiting the body of a half-man, half-animal being.

The film opens fairly straightforward as most films in this genre do. A group of tourists enjoying themselves, sucking up the atmosphere, drinking, making love to their girlfriends etc., etc. Then they decide that rather then surfing at the coast, they do something adventurous and explore this impenetrable area called the Darién Gap. They find the waterfall as the friend said. They then bathe in the pool below the waterfall for a while, till one of the couple decides to leave and do deeper into the jungle. Then all hell breaks loose...

The director, I feel, is unable into inject a real spark into this film. The actors that were chosen did their jobs as per the script. But the script itself is so obviously dull and predictable, that we already know what direction the film is headed at. In the past I saw a survival action-horror film that set the benchmark for all movies of its genre. This film was Predator, a 1987 film directed by John McTiernan. Also note that The Thing (1982) directed by John Carpenter is also a survival-horror film. Basis of such movies is an outer-space alien killing off humans.

More films you may like: Dawn of the Dead(1978), Tremors(1990), Jaws(1975), Shakma(1990), Prince of Darkness(1987), 30 Days of Night(2007).

Thank you for reading this review. May you live long and prosper.
  • Vivekmaru45
  • Jun 26, 2015
  • Permalink
4/10

Very weak actors

Similar to the film The Ruins but with a kind of humanoid and bloodthirsty monster. Very weak actors, filmed poorly. You may watch it, but it's just to pass the time.
  • josenelias
  • Feb 25, 2020
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.