Gandeevadhari Arjuna

This film should be banned. The images of REAL children with certain diseases, such as harlequin ichthyosis, were used WITHOUT their knowledge and without their permission. The film makers prostituted these children's images for their own shock value and monetary gain. It is appalling, it is wrong, and they need to be held accountable. These children have diseases that they work hard to bring awareness to on a daily basis. Their images are used on other accounts calling them "monster babies" and saying they don't deserve to live. ALL human life is planned and precious. These film makers have undone all of this in about 30 seconds. They, too, are guilty of making these children out to be monsters, when they are just babies fighting for their lives. PLEASE BAN THIS MOVIE!!!

"Gaandeevadhari Arjuna" is a compelling Telugu film that tackles the critical issue of toxic waste dumping by affluent nations into impoverished ones. The story follows a dedicated combat officer tasked with protecting an environmentally conscious minister at a UN summit. This officer's personal connection to the fight against climate change and biohazard waste adds depth to the narrative, offering viewers a visceral connection to the cause.

"Gandeevadhari Arjuna" is a stirring call to action, urging us to acknowledge our shared responsibility for the planet and stand against the exploitation of the vulnerable by the powerful.

In summary, "Gaandeevadhari Arjuna" is a powerful cinematic experience that blends entertainment with a crucial message. This film not only entertains but also inspires viewers to become agents of change in the battle against environmental injustice. It is a must-watch for anyone concerned about our planet's well-being and the ethical dilemmas we face in today's rapidly changing world.

I have reviewed based on the message above. The story goes into additional masala mainly for entertainment purposes which can be diluted for the message. There are many movies on this subject and needs more attention by the world leaders and waste generators.

I liked one point in the ministers presentation that "Indian ecosystem has found a perfect balance between human needs and environment" before the British invasion and the current industrialisation. We need to go back to similar standards of living to save the planet for next generations.

The story is great but the directing is very very weak. The flash memory clips could have been published in the movie somehow, or handed over to a responsible person, but the story of the movie is very long and revolves around the method of handing over the evidence.

.. .. The story is great but the directing is very very weak. The flash memory clips could have been published in the movie somehow, or handed over to a responsible person, but the story of the movie is very long and revolves around the method of handing over the evidence.

.. ... The story is great but the directing is very very weak. The flash memory clips could have been published in the movie somehow, or handed over to a responsible person, but the story of the movie is very long and revolves around the method of handing over the evidence.

The whole movie is centred around a journalist transporting a storage device containing File-13, which contains proof of a company's misdeeds, to a minister, so that he can release it at UN summit.

But this file-13 is revealed to be a video file and I don't really understand why people are physically transporting the storage containing the file, when they could just sent it online.

Usually in movies like this, there will be a reason as to why the file cannot be released to public as it will have some sort of negative impact if public learns about it. But in this movie, releasing the file online would be an instant win for the good guys.

The movie would be over in 5 minutes if the journalist just uploaded the video to Twitter . Or she could have sent the video to the minister and then the minister could have posted it or given it to media.

It's unfortunate that there is such a large plot hole because the movie was shot well as well as acted well. But it's very hard to enjoy a movie when there is such a large plot hole.

I don't usually give reviews but had to for this one as this was suvh a sh**tty screen play and direction. I don't understand why directors won't be practical and repeat same old movies. It's just torture for audience.

....

.

. .

I don't usually give reviews but had to for this one as this was suvh a sh**tty screen play and direction. I don't understand why directors won't be practical and repeat same old movies. It's just torture for audience. I don't usually give reviews but had to for this one as this was suvh a sh**tty screen play and direction. I don't understand why directors won't be practical and repeat same old movies. It's just torture for audience.