1920: Horrors of the Heart
- 2023
- 2h 2m
IMDb RATING
2.8/10
4.3K
YOUR RATING
A young girl walks into a world of darkness is search of revenge but darkness consumes her making her a victim of that very revenge.A young girl walks into a world of darkness is search of revenge but darkness consumes her making her a victim of that very revenge.A young girl walks into a world of darkness is search of revenge but darkness consumes her making her a victim of that very revenge.
Featured review
It's a horror movie that isn't scary in the least.
First of all- WHERE THE HELL DID THEY SHOOT THIS? I kept wondering during the entire movie- WHY?? Just why didn't they use normal sets anywhere in the movie, like previous 1920 movies? Just to save some money spent on a real set?
Not just the horror scenes, It felt like they shot the entire movie using green screens. Even normal scenes seemed like I am watching some actors move around in a CGI house, a CGI forest, even a CGI Hotel !?!? Who came up with the bad idea of avoiding real sets, that person needs to be fired immediately!
The reason overused CGI made me hate the film is because absolutely nothing in the movie felt real. If shot in a good location, a terrible story can make a movie very watchable.
The best recent example of this being Khamoshiyan. Its story was terrible, but I'd still watch that movie again just for its breathtaking scenes shot in South Africa(and of course the hum-worthy music). What the makers did with this movie feels like a low point of filmmaking in Bollywood.
The songs in this movie were forgettable too, except for the mother's lullaby.
Mahesh Bhatt was one of the writers, I assume he was drunk when he wrote this senseless script.
Only Rahul Dev, Avika Gor and Ketaki Kulkarni seemed to be taking their work seriously. Barkha Bisht sure looks beautiful but her expressions felt wooden. Avtar Gill's and Danish Pandor's acting was as useless as their characters.
In my opinion this is the worst installment in the franchise. Do not waste your time on this movie. Save yourself!
First of all- WHERE THE HELL DID THEY SHOOT THIS? I kept wondering during the entire movie- WHY?? Just why didn't they use normal sets anywhere in the movie, like previous 1920 movies? Just to save some money spent on a real set?
Not just the horror scenes, It felt like they shot the entire movie using green screens. Even normal scenes seemed like I am watching some actors move around in a CGI house, a CGI forest, even a CGI Hotel !?!? Who came up with the bad idea of avoiding real sets, that person needs to be fired immediately!
The reason overused CGI made me hate the film is because absolutely nothing in the movie felt real. If shot in a good location, a terrible story can make a movie very watchable.
The best recent example of this being Khamoshiyan. Its story was terrible, but I'd still watch that movie again just for its breathtaking scenes shot in South Africa(and of course the hum-worthy music). What the makers did with this movie feels like a low point of filmmaking in Bollywood.
The songs in this movie were forgettable too, except for the mother's lullaby.
Mahesh Bhatt was one of the writers, I assume he was drunk when he wrote this senseless script.
Only Rahul Dev, Avika Gor and Ketaki Kulkarni seemed to be taking their work seriously. Barkha Bisht sure looks beautiful but her expressions felt wooden. Avtar Gill's and Danish Pandor's acting was as useless as their characters.
In my opinion this is the worst installment in the franchise. Do not waste your time on this movie. Save yourself!
- meghana-meggy
- Dec 29, 2023
- Permalink
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaDirectional debut of Krishna Bhatt.
- How long is 1920: Horrors of the Heart?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Horrors of the Heart
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $39
- Runtime2 hours 2 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content