The Monkey's Paw

I don't know how many of these movies I've seen, that take an interesting premise (albeit one that follows the monkey's paw trope... a story dating back more than a century), and completely falls apart in the final act. I mean, practically everything out of Hollywood does that, but this is a low budget indie horror film shot in Louisiana.

Ok, Jake's former boss, who he may or may not have gotten fired, gives him a monkey's paw... with vindictive undertones. I really enjoyed how the first wish led to trouble (namely, the death of Jake's co-worker, Cobb), which leads to more trouble, the second wish, to bring Cobb back to life. Which, well you get the idea. If you've seen Pet Sematary (and the like), you know how this re-animation stuff goes. Some of Cobb's killings even made sense within the scope of this story, but what we ultimately get in the end, is a psycho killer on-the-loose, killing everything in his path. *Yawn*

And the end result of the final wish? WTF. The writers definitely ran into a brick wall around the 55-minute mark of this one. If you have a craving for this sort of story (in movie form, that is), check out the Wishmaster series, especially its off-the-rails 3rd sequel, Wishmaster 4: The Prophecy Fulfilled. Watch out for some crazy gore, which this film was severely lacking. Hell, watch the Monkey's Paw segment in Treehouse of Horror from The Simpsons, for a genius take.

+1 for Stephen Lang's performance here Such a great character actor and a pleasure to watch him play just about any part

-1 For the Ending Where a certain So and So stopped beating another certain So and So...no spoilers, haha

Okay a Story told fairly blandly and ends up being pretty average and really only saved by the additions of Lang and an underused Charles Dutton

I had never heard of the story before, so I didn't have any preconceptions. It's not too bad, but it switched back and forth between dead serious and camp and not very effectively.

Thomason and Lang both do a job, but Thomason plays it completely seriously while Lang plays it like a Freddy Krueger.

There's also a hint of a subplot that goes nowhere, where the cops and others suspect Thomason's character is doing the murders. Not the newest plot and it would take it in a Hitcher direction, but it could have worked here. The cops SHOULD have suspected him.

Seriously. This is a far much better film than its current, weak rating. There is also a serious flaw in IMDb's rating system. I think maybe members should have to actually be members for more than 1 day to leave a vote for ratings. 30, 60...maybe 90 days before you can vote or review a film unless you are a legitimate film critic with your own online site. Too many terrible films get very high ratings because people involved in the films get to create a new account and leave "Best Film Ever" reviews and "10 out of 10" ratings. Then, films like this one, which obviously deserves a much higher rating, end up having people leave "Worst Film Ever" reviews and "1 out of 10" ratings. Do you have a grudge against someone involved in this film? Not get the part you so desperately wanted? Did the director boink your girlfriend? No problem! Come on over to IMDb, create a new account and you can instantly voice just how terrible, poorly written and horribly acted the film was. Not to mention the director has a small penis.

I seriously need to set up my own film review site. You may not always agree with my reviews, but you can sure as hell know they are honest and not because I had something to do with any particular film one way or another, good or bad. Chiller Films' remake of THE MONKEY'S PAW is a very good movie with an original story. It's very well acted, shot, directed, and edited. It is not the "Best Film Ever," but it is damn well worth viewing and one of the best horror/comedies I have watched all year! Yes, this is indeed some serious monkey business! Now give me your paw...

Too many 'plot devices' by the writer/director in place of coherent storytelling.

What could have been an intriguing story about the paw was turned into a murder/slasher movie, which would not have been terrible if the murders made sense.

1. The villain has Flash-like abilities, no not really fast, but somehow appears wherever he needs to be in a few minutes (plot convenience). 2. The protagonist has the ability to warn people but instead talks in vague circles so the people in danger do not react (plot convenience). 3. Dumbest police ever (again). 4. The movie is about the paw, which is rarely seen. It is almost like they created a slasher movie first then added the paw element as an added twist so that is does not appear like a generic slasher movie (but it is). 5. The person with most screen time is the worst actor in movie. He never exudes any real emotion regardless of situation. 6. Charles S Dutton as the cop was wasted opportunity.

Positive? Stephen Lang plays his part very well.