IMDb RATING
5.8/10
621
YOUR RATING
The story of Lady Oscar, a female military commander who served during the time of the French Revolution.The story of Lady Oscar, a female military commander who served during the time of the French Revolution.The story of Lady Oscar, a female military commander who served during the time of the French Revolution.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Banjô Ginga
- General Jarjeyes
- (voice)
Caitlin Glass
- Oscar françois de jarjayes
- (English version)
- (voice)
Barbara Goodson
- Maron Glacé Mont Blanc
- (English version)
- (voice)
Damien C. Haas
- Louis XVI
- (English version)
- (voice)
- (as Damien Hass)
Jon Robert Hall
- Bernard Chatelet
- (English version)
- (singing voice)
- (as Jon Hall)
Aya Hirano
- Marie Antoinette
- (voice)
Miyu Irino
- Bernard Chatelet
- (voice)
Hironori Kondo
- Launay
- (voice)
Ryan Colt Levy
- Hans Axel von Fersen
- (English version)
- (voice)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
When I was a child, this story moved and shocked me deeply. I had high hopes for MAPPA's theatrical version, but to my dismay, not even 20 minutes in, I was already thinking, "What am I watching?" and "Did I open the wrong movie?" I barely lasted an hour before giving up. Throughout the viewing, I couldn't connect with the characters' emotions at all. The story, which should have resonated deeply with the audience, felt completely hollow. The scene transitions were jarring, and even the use of music felt off and disconnected from the narrative-as if they just wanted to rush through the story.
This was originally a story rich with a strong sense of its era. I still remember how heartbreaking it was to see André die when I watched it as a kid. Oscar was such a stunningly cool woman. But the 2025 theatrical version had none of that! It tried to compress a story that originally took many episodes to tell into just two hours. Naturally, the screenplay should've carefully chosen which parts to keep or cut, and there was no way the original pacing could be copied wholesale. After about an hour, I just felt the pacing was all over the place, and I had no idea what the storytelling was trying to convey. Many scenes were delivered in such awkward ways that I found myself constantly thinking, "Uhh... what?"-completely speechless.
Three stars: one for Hiroyuki Sawano's music, one for the voice actors who clearly understood their roles, and one for the beautiful visuals. That's it. Regardless of the medium-anime, novel, manga, live-action TV, or film-the story and writing are absolutely critical. But in this film, I saw no evidence of thoughtful screenwriting or post-production effort.
Take NieR, for example-originally a game adapted into an anime. You could tell the writers put in real effort to weave the entire story together. Even though they changed the order of events or tweaked some scenes, they still managed to faithfully recreate the narrative and evoke genuine emotion in the audience. That's something the 2025 Rose of Versailles movie completely failed to do.
This was originally a story rich with a strong sense of its era. I still remember how heartbreaking it was to see André die when I watched it as a kid. Oscar was such a stunningly cool woman. But the 2025 theatrical version had none of that! It tried to compress a story that originally took many episodes to tell into just two hours. Naturally, the screenplay should've carefully chosen which parts to keep or cut, and there was no way the original pacing could be copied wholesale. After about an hour, I just felt the pacing was all over the place, and I had no idea what the storytelling was trying to convey. Many scenes were delivered in such awkward ways that I found myself constantly thinking, "Uhh... what?"-completely speechless.
Three stars: one for Hiroyuki Sawano's music, one for the voice actors who clearly understood their roles, and one for the beautiful visuals. That's it. Regardless of the medium-anime, novel, manga, live-action TV, or film-the story and writing are absolutely critical. But in this film, I saw no evidence of thoughtful screenwriting or post-production effort.
Take NieR, for example-originally a game adapted into an anime. You could tell the writers put in real effort to weave the entire story together. Even though they changed the order of events or tweaked some scenes, they still managed to faithfully recreate the narrative and evoke genuine emotion in the audience. That's something the 2025 Rose of Versailles movie completely failed to do.
Just saw this movie on Netflix and since i saw the poster and trailer i thought it looked amazing.
After seeing the movie i'm left with mixed feelings.
The movie feels like it can't decide on who to focus, switching between Lady Oscar and Maria Antonieta
It also summarizes some of the historical events that led to the demise of the old french regimen
Biggest complain for me are the constant musical numbers that in my opinion don't do a very good job at explaining part of the story and also the music isn't very good
There are far too many musical montages even to the point that there would be 2 songs back to back.
Enjoyed the overall plot about Oscar, King Luis 16, Antonieta and what love means to them, many of the scenes have outstanding visuals, but some of the scenes look blank, it's a mixed bag.
I really didn't like any of the musical numbers.
After seeing the movie i'm left with mixed feelings.
The movie feels like it can't decide on who to focus, switching between Lady Oscar and Maria Antonieta
It also summarizes some of the historical events that led to the demise of the old french regimen
Biggest complain for me are the constant musical numbers that in my opinion don't do a very good job at explaining part of the story and also the music isn't very good
There are far too many musical montages even to the point that there would be 2 songs back to back.
Enjoyed the overall plot about Oscar, King Luis 16, Antonieta and what love means to them, many of the scenes have outstanding visuals, but some of the scenes look blank, it's a mixed bag.
I really didn't like any of the musical numbers.
Romanticizing much? Why are the Japanese making manga about the French revolution? It's jarring hearing the dialogue and the names in Japanese. Also, Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette kept playing in my head, even more so when Fersen appeared and I kept thinking of himbo Jamie Dornan here.
And why am I even watching this? Ok, cause I have heard of Lady Oscar and how apparently she influenced a whole style of anime character and whatever but I gotta admit I was pretty disappointed in this and basically it's a waste of time. I can't believe for more than half the movie they're making me sympathize with Marie Antoinette, but it's not working at all cause this is clearly made for children, certainly not for 40 year olds. It's so basic, but the style of animation is so familiar, it's exactly what they were playing on TV for kids in the 90s and I loved most of them. Now I can only smile at how they walk and cry and how their whole body shakes, it's such a cliche. But maybe the nostalgic look is what they are going for in 2025. I wonder who is the audience for this now. Oh, and there are quite a few musical numbers complete with distinct videos of their own slapped in there at "pivotal" moments.
I probably would have liked this as a child, in fact I'm sure I would've, maybe not as much as others as I wouldn't have been that interested in the history and it's not really that good of a story in the romance genre, I'd say it's the opposite. As for Oscar as a gender-bending icon, that would've gone right over my head, in that I wouldn't have seen the uniqueness of the character, but now I can understand and appreciate the effort, especially in a patriarchal society such as Japan, in the 70s and even now. Still, doubtful Oscar could have been real in 1780s France, sadly.
And why am I even watching this? Ok, cause I have heard of Lady Oscar and how apparently she influenced a whole style of anime character and whatever but I gotta admit I was pretty disappointed in this and basically it's a waste of time. I can't believe for more than half the movie they're making me sympathize with Marie Antoinette, but it's not working at all cause this is clearly made for children, certainly not for 40 year olds. It's so basic, but the style of animation is so familiar, it's exactly what they were playing on TV for kids in the 90s and I loved most of them. Now I can only smile at how they walk and cry and how their whole body shakes, it's such a cliche. But maybe the nostalgic look is what they are going for in 2025. I wonder who is the audience for this now. Oh, and there are quite a few musical numbers complete with distinct videos of their own slapped in there at "pivotal" moments.
I probably would have liked this as a child, in fact I'm sure I would've, maybe not as much as others as I wouldn't have been that interested in the history and it's not really that good of a story in the romance genre, I'd say it's the opposite. As for Oscar as a gender-bending icon, that would've gone right over my head, in that I wouldn't have seen the uniqueness of the character, but now I can understand and appreciate the effort, especially in a patriarchal society such as Japan, in the 70s and even now. Still, doubtful Oscar could have been real in 1780s France, sadly.
Those who fell for the original series were compelled by the intense and sweeping storyline that was driven by the main characters and negating nearly all background characters who were also important to moving the story makes this series that feels like an empty and shallow world of what was a cult classic that moved and inspired other works. When Lady Oscar would fight, she did not hold back, she was colder for longer, and the films sort of takes that from her with the pacing between the musical numbers and story created too much overwhelm to actually enjoy the film. Her character was compromised for flashy ensembles and I highly suggest to watch the original series entirely before attempting to watching this hectic overview. That being said the artwork is one of its strengths and it was refreshing to see an attempt at this pivotal series. I'm not mad, just disappointed.
The character development is nonexistent, and they made a terrible musical. It has time jumps of years in seconds, and the story as it was told generates no interest.
The love story between the characters is incongruous.
The story of Marie Antoinette and King Louis XVI is almost nonexistent; it loses all the context that the original series had and that made it interesting.
On the other hand, the songs are neither adequate nor of high quality, which causes a feeling of discomfort when you realize they've transformed the story into a musical. This, in my personal opinion, is the most negative aspect.
Don't watch it; just keep the memories of the original series.
The art is very detailed, but it doesn't make up for the poorly developed film.
The love story between the characters is incongruous.
The story of Marie Antoinette and King Louis XVI is almost nonexistent; it loses all the context that the original series had and that made it interesting.
On the other hand, the songs are neither adequate nor of high quality, which causes a feeling of discomfort when you realize they've transformed the story into a musical. This, in my personal opinion, is the most negative aspect.
Don't watch it; just keep the memories of the original series.
The art is very detailed, but it doesn't make up for the poorly developed film.
Did you know
- TriviaWhile the 2025 anime film is dubbed in English, Lady Oscar (1979) was not.
- ConnectionsRemake of Lady Oscar (1979)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- La rosa de Versalles
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $1,489,577
- Runtime1 hour 53 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content