[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Anthony Hopkins, Natalie Portman, Christopher Eccleston, Tadanobu Asano, Idris Elba, Ray Stevenson, Tom Hiddleston, Zachary Levi, Chris Hemsworth, and Jaimie Alexander in Thor : Le Monde des ténèbres (2013)

User reviews

Thor : Le Monde des ténèbres

938 reviews
7/10

WHY SO MUCH HATE

  • ritiksinghal-32110
  • Jun 24, 2023
  • Permalink
8/10

Thor Rocks.

I know this film has been ragged on by many people, but I really enjoyed it. Was great seeing Asgard, and how Mjolnir followed Thor around was wonderful. Hey, Thos has always been one of my favorite characters, and Hemsworth plays him so well.
  • scifier-32295
  • Apr 29, 2019
  • Permalink
7/10

Thor

Is this a huge stepup from the original "Thor" movie. No, unfortunately not. Is it another watchable, fun superhero movie; yes, definitely. It's a really good movie and if we look at the way Alan Taylor directs this movie, it's actually not that much different from what Branagh did back in 2011. Chris Hemsworth is good as usual and Tom Hiddleston is more wonderful than ever as Loki, but the villain Malekith, played by Christopher Eccleston, unfortunately, is a bit of a disappointment, mostly because of the lack of motivation.
  • 0U
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • Permalink
6/10

Not bad at all

  • Leofwine_draca
  • Aug 11, 2017
  • Permalink
6/10

Thor: The Dark World (Short Movie Review)

Positives:
  • Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston
  • Some of the humor


Negatives:
  • Story
  • Weak and boring villain
  • Most of the humor
  • One-note side characters (Again)
  • Cirene404
  • May 29, 2019
  • Permalink
10/10

The Light at the End of a Dark World

When we left our friends in Asgard, all was right in the 9 realms after Loki was thrown into an abyss for his selfish ways and almost destroyed everything the Asgardians hold most dear. But it has been 2 years since Jane Foster and Thor parted ways and now they are reunited because of a darkness that shrouds over Jane's inner body as she infects a most powerful and deadly weapon that could not only destroy her but the entire 9 realms – it takes a vicious monster Malekith (played wonderfully by Christopher Eccleston) to destroy all of the races in the universe to converge it all in darkness.

But it takes Thor (Hemsworth) along with Foster (Portman) and Loki (Hiddleston) to save the day. But what we don't know may surprise us – that the Tesseract, the Aether, so close together creates something more deadly than what they could ever even think that could happen to the fate of the entire universe.

This movie was excellent and I am looking forward to seeing what is next for our mighty god of thunder.
  • jasonpachar
  • Jun 25, 2014
  • Permalink
6/10

A wasted opportunity

  • irrelevantlife
  • Mar 8, 2014
  • Permalink
9/10

A good entry into the Marvel Universe

Having just watched a premier screening, I am delighted to come away from the cinema to write a positive review. Thor Dark World is a spectacular special effect driven film, much of which is set in Asguard.

I was worried that including Loki yet again might become a little repetitive, but in this film he excels as a great character, I only hope however that they don't overdue his presence in the Marvel Universe. How many times can this guy come back from the dead?

There isn't as much character development as the first film, and Thor's friends are nowhere near as interesting as the Avengers. I guess they simply needed these characters to all remain as they were so as to keep continuity within the Marvel universe, but its noticeable how little impact the storyline will have on anybody.

The armies of Asguard were noticeably lacking in fire-power and weapons (even though they have an armoury), which is made even more evident when an entire guard division bring knives to a laser-gun fight. Their turrents were the only defense they had against an Ariel assault and proved to be practically useless. You would expect them to be better prepared.

The healing powers of Thor, Jane, and even a smashed alien space-craft become a bit of a running joke as well. But at least they get hurt, even if it only takes them a scene to heal. And if smashing every column holding up a building is still not enough to take it down I'm not sure what will be.

Christopher Eccleston played a competent bad guy, although his intentions for what he was doing was still unclear as to why. Its simple to say he was insane and just wanted to kill everybody, but when a threat of that magnitude appears and planetary alignments are in effect, you expect half the Universe to show up and stop him or take advantage of the situation, or come looking to take the power for themselves. I also expected to see the entire army of Asguard come to help out at the end like they apparently did in the past. Not just Thor who appears there by mistake.

The scientist with the miraculous plot saving devise is also a little hard fetch to take in, especially when he creates a remote control for cosmic anomalies. Along with Loki's illusion power which also serves as a convenient plot-saving devise at times. I'm willing to overlook these but there's no denying what they are.

Overall its a good enjoyable superhero movie, which you will want to watch several times and is a decent entry into the Marvel Universe.

P.S. Watch it in 2D, The 3D added little of worth.
  • Amazing_Wizard
  • Oct 28, 2013
  • Permalink
7/10

"I'd rather be a good man than a good king".

  • classicsoncall
  • Dec 6, 2014
  • Permalink
4/10

All style, no substance

The acting was solid. The production value was superb. Everything else was really poor.

The back story and character motivations are laughably sparse. Most of the characters are completely one-dimensional, with the possible exception of Loki. The plot is the most boring and typical of all action plots - some "bad dudes who happen to be really ugly" decide to "destroy the world for no reason other than being evil" and "only our hero can save us all", etc. Moreover, it was lazy writing - whenever an absolute miracle needed to happen, it conveniently did, every time.

Of course this is a mindless blockbuster Marvel movie so we shouldn't expect much. But the thing is that these kinds of films CAN be made with a reasonable plot, pacing, and character development. The writers were obviously just going through the motions to cash in on the surefire moneymaker sequel, and from a business perspective it is hard to fault them. But it says a lot about the sad state of Hollywood in 2013 that this film currently has a 7.7 on IMDb.
  • ff9000
  • Nov 9, 2013
  • Permalink
9/10

Loved it!

For starters, I loved this film! I was a fan of the first but this one is superior in every way. The actions scenes are better, the plot is better and there is great banter throughout the film. Due to these factors it is entertaining and has more than enough in it to keep you interested. The acting is fantastic, especial by Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston, as they work great together and appear to have a great understanding of each others roles. I just can't understand why people don't like this film unless they are not a fan of superheroes. After seeing this film last night I read through a few of the reviews afterwards and was shocked as some people were giving it lower than 7. These people are clearly boring and have no idea about an entertaining film and enjoy watching films that just depress you and have no idea about what a fantastic superhero film this is. I recommend you watch this immediately as you won't be disappointed.
  • lukewakeman44
  • Oct 30, 2013
  • Permalink
6/10

Another fun entry for the Marvel franchise

  • GTeixeira
  • Feb 4, 2014
  • Permalink
5/10

Thor The Dark World: One of the weaker MCU offerings

Plot

When the Dark Elves attempt to plunge the universe into darkness, Thor must embark on a perilous and personal journey that will reunite him with doctor Jane Foster.

Cast

The same bunch as before but now we have a disappointing Eccleston and Fandral has been recast with Zachary Levi.

Verdict

I didn't hate the first Thor but I didn't deem it a great film, our titular character bounced between distinctly unlikable and oddly hilarious and didn't seem to manage as a leading man. The supporting cast, a combination of bland and oddly quaint! Dennings character walking a fine line between being quaint and deeply annoying.

The humor is on point, the visuals are interesting, Thor is the same mix of unlikable and funny (But less so than the first film) but the plot is really unengaging, Malkeith makes for a terrible villain and the ending is really quite poor.

The film also distances itself from the MC quite a bit, there aren't as many nods as we're used to though the Captain America cameo was kind of neat.

I consider Dark World one of the weak links in the MCU, thankfully Thors next solo outing made up for it.

Rants

I don't know what it is with Portman but she's so remarkably unlikable. Is it her face? Is it her acting ability? Is it her real life personality? I honestly don't know what my issue is. She just looks like someone who would kick me between the legs, put a cigarette out in my eye and expect me to say thank you.

Breakdown

Some funny moments A few solid cast members Malkeith is a terrible villain Inconsistent tones Plenty of bland moments.
  • Platypuschow
  • Jan 9, 2024
  • Permalink

Pure Enjoyment!

Occasionally in life there are those moments of unutterable fulfillment which cannot be completely explained by those symbols called words. This sequel is one such moment. I do need to see it again. In terms of pure enjoy-ability, I put it top 3 of all sequels that I have enjoyed.

What I really liked...

-Every single character gets a moment to shine and every single actor cast in these parts are perfect.

-The comedy is perfect. It's such a fine balance overall and everything works because it's very subtle and fits in with certain circumstances.

-Some very tender emotional scenes. I won't spoil anything with specifics.

-Some superb action and what could very well be award winning special effects.

-All characters interactions are great and handled very well. This is a fantasy story that really cares about character first and it shows all the way through. Even Natalie Portman's Jane feel more fleshed out than she did in the original film.

-The set pieces and other realms talked about in the first are seen here and are beautiful and well done. Asgard was even better believe it or not.

-The mid-credit and end credit scenes, both cool. Make sure you stay for both.

Marvel hit a pure home run with this endeavor. This film works because of the great cast and the fact that they took this subject matter seriously but remember to have fun. Chris Hemsworth was again perfect. I thoroughly enjoyed this movie.
  • jojunno
  • Oct 29, 2013
  • Permalink
6/10

Action Packed Fantasy Romcom?

Well I was so looking forward to seeing this movie when I went last night, and although it was reasonably good it was not at all what I expected.

Watch the official movie trailer and you see what looks like quite a dark fantasy, so you can imagine my surprise when throughout the movie the audience was laughing out loud at the stupid one liners. Yes I know this is entertainment, and this movie was moderately entertaining, but once again the makers have tried to please everyone by adding a bit of everything; action, special effects, romance and humour, just far too much of the latter for my taste in a genre that does not require hilarity to succeed.

Although it has a lower IMDb score I much preferred the 2011 Thor, a stronger storyline, darker and no laughing matter!
  • philip-554-602536
  • Nov 2, 2013
  • Permalink
6/10

Sigh...Zzzz...

I was never a really big fan of Thor to begin with and this movie just proves it to me again. This movie was so slow and boring. The first hour I almost fell asleep a few times. The special effects were really well done but other then that I really do not think this was a great movie. I gave this movie a generous 6 out of a possible 10. Normally these types of movies at least earn a 7 from me but this one at best was a 6 only.

You can tell that this sequel was made for the sack of making some more money off the very boring Thor. I for one will not waste my money on a third that is for sure. They really need to stop wasting everyone's time with Thor. He is boring and other then his looks has very little going for him. Good day!
  • maleficarus
  • Dec 21, 2013
  • Permalink
10/10

Well, that was a surprise

Just got back from seeing this and thought I'd put in my thoughts.

This is by far the most intricate and thoughtful of the Marvel films to date, with a great story and some superb performances, particularly Hiddleston's as Loki. The characters from previous Asgard related outings are there, but thanks to some good writing, are more 3 dimensional and therefore, interesting. This is one of the few films that would have benefited from an extra 15 minutes or so to explore further the motivations of the key protagonists.

There is plenty of large scale action, as well as some laugh out loud humorous moments that help to keep this kicking along.

I am both surprised and delighted that this is not only the best superhero movie to date, (even eclipsing Spider-Man 2), but currently the best movie I've seen this year.

Don't miss this!
  • newtonpost
  • Oct 29, 2013
  • Permalink
7/10

Good movie

It's a good movie. Like that Natalie Portman was still in it. Too bad she wasn't in Thor Ragnarok. The bad was they tried to go funny at parts. It wasn't very funny.
  • djfrost-46786
  • May 16, 2018
  • Permalink
10/10

Great Entertainment

Thor 2 "The Dark World" gives great entertainment movie. Both the parts of the series of Thor gives full entertainment, and full of enjoyment. It is one of the best sequel I watched. The theme and concept of the movie is very perfect and is best suitable. Thanks to the Marvel gives much entertainer movie.

All the characters played in this movie is so perfect. Specially i like the character of Loki played by Tom Hiddleston.

Overall This movie is great entertainer movie with lots of actions with excellent graphics.

I give it 10/10.
  • abuwaquase
  • Nov 9, 2013
  • Permalink
7/10

With more money involved, the film goes a little beyond the level of its predecessor, but does not bring any real surprises.

This film is the sequel to "Thor" and another good film to watch with a large bag of popcorn on the side. It's not a film made to be profound, nor to make its audience think. It's pure entertainment, action, high-impact visual effects and CGI, and remarkable technical quality.

Directed by Alan Taylor, who replaced Kenneth Branagh, the film presents itself as something denser and more mature than its direct predecessor. It also seems to me that Marvel invested more money in this project, convinced that it was yet another multi-million dollar franchise to make a few million dollars. The visual effects and CGI team probably required the most money, but the outlay was worth it: the film is truly worthy of the big screen and takes on an epic dimension if we see it in the cinema, with all the refinements that a good cinema with cutting-edge technology can give us. Even the most expensive "home theater" on the market is incapable of giving us the true dimension of the visual and auditory spectacle that the film wants to provide us. The soundtrack, by Brian Taylor, contributes by giving a truly adventurous and epic tone to the action scenes, without leaving the heart aside in the more intimate and romantic moments. The studio-made sets, with obvious use of lots of green screens, are good, as are the costumes, especially those of Thor, Loki and their companions.

The cast's performance is also not lacking. Girl fans of Chris Hemsworth, who gained sex symbol status with these films, can delight in the actor's efforts and envy Natalie Portman, who once again brings his romantic partner to life. For me, in particular, Hemsworth maintained the level he brought from the previous film, but he wasn't really able to be deep and emotional in the scenes that required a greater dose of feeling. For her part, Portman doesn't really have much to do other than be desirable and follow her beloved wherever he goes, occasionally helping him out. The ever-reliable and dependable Sir Anthony Hopkins has a more solid role in this film, with much better written material, and is suitably matched with a more solid effort. Tom Hiddleston also has time to appear more than just a detestable being, and he makes the most of the opportunity. Unfortunately, Chris Eccleston is limited to being a walking, talking puppet and Stellan Skarsgård seems to have lost all self-respect in accepting material as infamous as what he was offered here.

In fact, where I felt the most problems was in the writing and development of the written script, which was the responsibility of Ashley E. Miller and his colleagues. The basic story is good and fits the characters' environment and universe very well, but the devil is in the details! There are indeed logic problems that are difficult to solve. For example: throughout the two films, Asgard was portrayed as a kind of military power that is capable of defending itself from any attack and also helping other universes and maintaining a climate of peace and harmony among all, but in this film we see the fragility of its defenses and the almost childish way in which a surprise attack managed to be devastating. The issue of wormholes between worlds caused by alignment is also bizarre and raises questions if you think about it too much, which the movie definitely doesn't want us to do. There is also the issue of Loki: he has shown himself to be despicable and treacherous to the core, and yet Thor forgives him almost instantly and places the fate of the mission he will undertake in his brother's hands... this is either childish naivety or a willingness to be betrayed!
  • filipemanuelneto
  • Mar 18, 2025
  • Permalink
3/10

Even more shallow than the first.

  • redpandarevolution
  • Dec 5, 2013
  • Permalink
10/10

loved it

  • daveferrie394
  • Oct 29, 2013
  • Permalink
6/10

A much stronger entry into the Avengers universe than both Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D and Iron Man 3

  • andrewleivesley-697-421069
  • Oct 29, 2013
  • Permalink
2/10

Completely on autopilot...

  • DarthVoorhees
  • Dec 7, 2013
  • Permalink

Just Wonderful! Packed with action, heartfelt emotion, humor, drama and intensity.

Thor The Dark World is brilliant and completely tops the first film. There are a lot of extremely funny bits in it as well as some dark and moving moments. Probably a much funnier movie than it had any right to be given the subject matter. Loki is done perfectly and the dialogue between him and Thor is superb.

If you're a fan of the first, this certainly won't disappoint at all. Without spoiling anything, the scale of this film is very Avengers-like in that the action pieces are amazing. During a sequence halfway through, I literally turned to my friend and said, "this is freakin' awesome".

Needless to say, I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. Each frame is packed with action, heartfelt emotion, humor, drama or intensity. I was expecting to simply see crazy mythology with monsters destroying the landscape of the nine realms for two hours. Instead, I was shocked at the depth and complexity of this film. You definitely need your brain and your heart turned on for this one, unlike other CGI mishmashes. If you want a movie with just dumb action and no plot then stay away from this exceptional film. The performances are top tier and the visual effects may be the best I've seen this year. I have to join the majority of people and even critics that are praising this film. It's a true joy and such a pleasant experience.
  • stargatesam
  • Oct 30, 2013
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.