Tribunal Justice

I only watch the "Judy Sheindlin" court shows because although they are entertaining, the judgments and courtroom decorum are largely based on genuine law. These three no-nonsense judges are seasoned as two are from the original Hot Bench and Levy, the new addition, clearly knows his stuff. I hope this show is renewed as long as the three want to do this work. They each offer unique perspectives based on their own legal and personal experiences. I'm also happy to see Byrd back on the job. This was a wise move by Sheindlin as it was probably time for him to work separately. As a result, this show provides an ensemble that gels.

Seriously?

I feel this is crazy town because one of the judges is so over reactive it appears almost violent. While the other two Judges are interesting, thoughtful and focused on cases and not exploding. And still very entertaining as well as professional.

So maybe a new third Judge would be better. Someone not so perhaps focused on drama, but I feel maybe more focused on the calm and perhaps better appearing focus on the law. Hearing cases without explosive and what I feel is very unsavory reflection of the judicial process would also be great.

Screaming? Yelling? Flared eyes, nose and what I feel is an overall unsettling and unprofessional reflection of the Law.

WOW. Crazy!

I just started watching this show this past weekend and I absolutely love it. No matter whether it's real or fake it fun to see a different take on having a panel of 3 judges with different points of view in how they go about deciding guilt or innocence. So if the cases brought before them seem a bit outlandish at times but at the same time I stop and think and remind myself that there's enough crazy people out there to get caught up in crazier situations. I also love how when they go to deliberate how they all offer their own point of view and they listen to one another explain their way of thinking. Sometimes their all on the same page and sometimes their not.

I already loved Judges Tanya and Patricia, and now I'm pleased to see Judge Adam Levy. Each jurist brings great styles of examining the litigants. I do enjoy watching Adam Levy catch liars and call out inconsistencies the way he does. Starting with Judge Judy, who my grandmommy and I watched decades ago, I've come to enjoy certain personalities on court shows. I only ever liked, no, loved Judge Judy to this day, and I did fall in love with Tanya Acker and Patricia DiMango years ago. And I love Adam too now. I find the colorful personalities of the judges entertaining and enjoyable. I think the judges reach fair and just decisions in their collaborative efforts. I think it's entertaining. But I am a bit biased. At age 56, I've spent almost half my life watching and loving Judge Judy, and anything she endeavors I'm interested in. Also, this show is also great.

What's not to love about this show, I missed Judge Aker and DiMango and Levy is a great add, with his pin point observations catching folks in their own lies Lol. Seeing Byrd was awesome addition too! Hot bench started off strong for several years with these 2 women really holding their own. Not that the two male judges didn't, it's just they didn't match their energy imo. Now with Judge Levy I'm completly satisfied now because his energy is spot in with theirs. I love how he looks into both the plaintiffs and defendants past history and records. This court very thorough and I for one really appreciate that. More info can give a better observation and probable cause. Tribunal is now my new love! Keep em coming Judy!