[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
The House in Between 2 (2022)

Review by ShftyEyedGoat

The House in Between 2

1/10

A sequel? Why?

Why would you make a sequel to a poorly investigated home? Oh! Because you forgot to do actual scientific investigations! (some comments might bleed over from the first 'movie') Let's bring in some psychics that supposedly have no knowledge of the location. OOPS! They left all their camera gear up showing all the "hot spots" possibly contaminating a blind test.

The light keeps turning on and off, let's bring out a 'professional' who can look at the device. Oh he just looked at the breaker and the switches... do you need to look at the light itself, the electrical wiring, or maybe even install something to monitor the voltage of the light to see what might be happening during the light turning off? NOPE! We're using science!

Oh the ball keeps getting pushed off the stairs...should we add more cameras to view from all angles, try using a ball with an accelerometer as you can clearly see the ball starts rolling vs being fully pushed, should we add different types of cameras to look at heat or other things as this is a reoccurring phenomena ??? NOPE cuz we're doing science wrong! (correction) oh they finally brought in someone to use a ball to monitor things, odd it has taken so long.

Oh do you hear that high pitch sound? Yeah man, I do hear it! Should they bring in a full spectrum recording device that could actually record that frequency? NOPE!

Let's just keep bringing in 'experts' that barely do anything or bring in much of any tools that are a known quantity. Let's bring in random tools that measure "something" and give no explanation as to what they do or how that measurement of something came about. I know looking for paranormal evidence will require measuring something other than your basic things like temp, heat, etc. But you still have to give some base to it.

They talk about wanting to be taken seriously but don't follow basic scientific processes. Stop doing a bad job at properly measuring and recording things and maybe we'll take you seriously. Always be recording audio and other visual spectrums to compare what you see with all available data. Just give it a go please.
  • ShftyEyedGoat
  • Jan 13, 2024

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.