William & Kate: romance royale
Original title: William & Catherine: A Royal Romance
IMDb RATING
4.9/10
553
YOUR RATING
Prince William (Dan Amboyer) and Kate Middleton (Alice St. Clair) were just friends at college, but after they got closer -- and she met his family -- they found themselves at the center of ... Read allPrince William (Dan Amboyer) and Kate Middleton (Alice St. Clair) were just friends at college, but after they got closer -- and she met his family -- they found themselves at the center of one of the most celebrated weddings in history.Prince William (Dan Amboyer) and Kate Middleton (Alice St. Clair) were just friends at college, but after they got closer -- and she met his family -- they found themselves at the center of one of the most celebrated weddings in history.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I enjoyed this movie. The sets and costumes are good. All the actors did a very good job. Most of them reasonably resembled their real-life counterparts, especially Alice St. Clair as Kate Middleton, yet the film is lackluster. I think it must be the directing or the editing. Something undefinable stopped the movie from being really good. I don't know exactly what. Nonetheless, it's worth watching.
Do not waste your time on this unless you are an unapologetic Royal sycophant.
Enchanting love story about the royals,that could also be about anyone of us.How do we know when we meet the right one? Can we get advice from a treasured loved one that is only found in our heart? The movie displays enduring love in a variety of ways.Glimpses of ourselves in this young couple.Masterful look at the inner workings of the behind the scenes royals.Jane Alexander is the queen that we would all like her to be.The young couple playing the future king and queen have the chemistry of Beaty and Wood. Victor Garber and Jean Smart allows one to see Prince Charles and Camilla in a whole new light. This movie is a gift to anyone fortunate enough to view it.
The good:
To be fair, most of the talent is not bad at all (considering mostly Americans playing arch English-voiced icons, which is usually – Ms Streep excepted – disastrous).
The bad:
The scrip is ridiculous and philistine in the extreme. Why not at least check a few basic facts for such a biopic? How can the most basic genealogy be so difficult for American production teams to fathom? E.g. In a scene near the end we have Prince Phillip in bed with the Queen (BTW it's been publicly noted for decades that they have separate sleeping-chambers, remember when world news covered the Queen's sleeping-chamber being broken into by a disturbed intruder and she was left to deal with him entirely alone?) referring to 'the king, your great uncle Edward ...' Hello? King Edward VII was the Queen's great GRANDFATHER, not UNCLE. King Edward the VIII was her UNCLE, but not GREAT uncle. No great uncle of the Queen's was a King Edward.
When yanks try to do English royal stories of historical significance they make such unforgivably clumsy blunders. Just like the Tudors series (aimed at US viewers), where our current English Royal family's ancestral link with the Tudor Dynasty – sister of Henry VIII Princess Margaret Tudor – is morphed into her sister Princess Mary but keeps the same forename (because they insultingly assume viewers are too dumb to follow a true story with 2 Princess Mary's involved, i.e. the other P Mary in it being Henry VIII's daughter rather to sister ), and is then married off to some fictional European monarch, quite erasing the facts explaining our present royalty's proper right to rule, which are that Princess Margaret Tudor married King James Stuart IV of Scotland, hence our royalty's Stuart lineage which, in turn, takes them back to the Tudors, whose daughter Margaret married into the Stuarts. Furthermore, the actress playing Catherine is called 'royal' in IMDb trivia page, but she's not royal at all, she's from a titled family, sure. But when did every titled Brit family become 'royal'?
The verdict:
Really guys, the film's awful music aside (best kept nowadays for a sliced-bread commercial or whatever), this vital genealogy stuff usually central to these tales is not rocket science (millions use Ancestry.com and mange OK). If you're going to spend megabucks why not save yourselves the global embarrassment and do 5 minutes' basic research (which you oughtn't need do anyway if you had even the most elementary schooling)?
To be fair, most of the talent is not bad at all (considering mostly Americans playing arch English-voiced icons, which is usually – Ms Streep excepted – disastrous).
The bad:
The scrip is ridiculous and philistine in the extreme. Why not at least check a few basic facts for such a biopic? How can the most basic genealogy be so difficult for American production teams to fathom? E.g. In a scene near the end we have Prince Phillip in bed with the Queen (BTW it's been publicly noted for decades that they have separate sleeping-chambers, remember when world news covered the Queen's sleeping-chamber being broken into by a disturbed intruder and she was left to deal with him entirely alone?) referring to 'the king, your great uncle Edward ...' Hello? King Edward VII was the Queen's great GRANDFATHER, not UNCLE. King Edward the VIII was her UNCLE, but not GREAT uncle. No great uncle of the Queen's was a King Edward.
When yanks try to do English royal stories of historical significance they make such unforgivably clumsy blunders. Just like the Tudors series (aimed at US viewers), where our current English Royal family's ancestral link with the Tudor Dynasty – sister of Henry VIII Princess Margaret Tudor – is morphed into her sister Princess Mary but keeps the same forename (because they insultingly assume viewers are too dumb to follow a true story with 2 Princess Mary's involved, i.e. the other P Mary in it being Henry VIII's daughter rather to sister ), and is then married off to some fictional European monarch, quite erasing the facts explaining our present royalty's proper right to rule, which are that Princess Margaret Tudor married King James Stuart IV of Scotland, hence our royalty's Stuart lineage which, in turn, takes them back to the Tudors, whose daughter Margaret married into the Stuarts. Furthermore, the actress playing Catherine is called 'royal' in IMDb trivia page, but she's not royal at all, she's from a titled family, sure. But when did every titled Brit family become 'royal'?
The verdict:
Really guys, the film's awful music aside (best kept nowadays for a sliced-bread commercial or whatever), this vital genealogy stuff usually central to these tales is not rocket science (millions use Ancestry.com and mange OK). If you're going to spend megabucks why not save yourselves the global embarrassment and do 5 minutes' basic research (which you oughtn't need do anyway if you had even the most elementary schooling)?
I have watched this movie more times than I care to admit and it never gets old! I love that I can watch it with my sisters and we can experience all the emotions together. It also has lots of profound advice and amazing quotes that really hit home. Definitely in my top 3 favorite movies.
Did you know
- TriviaThe part of future royal, Kate Middleton, is played by a noble, Lady Alice St Clair Erskine.
Details
- Runtime1 hour 26 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content