Johnny vs Amber

If I hadn't been following the Fairfax trial and doing research on the UK one, this may well have convinced me that Johnny Depp was guilty. An effective hit piece for people that don't read beyond the headlines.

This "documentary" wants you to believe the mainstream media's version of events, so they focus on the travesty that was the UK trial against the Sun. They have a narrative to push on us, and this is just another attempt at doing just that.

The MSM desperately want you to believe that WOMEN - and only WOMEN - are victims. That men cannot be abused.

A dishonest and dangerous message indeed.

Do yourself a favour and do what I did: watch the Virginia trial, look at the available evidence for yourself, read the transcripts, listen to the unedited audio recordings.

Johnny Depp's innocence is not a dangerous message for abused women.

It's a positive message reminding us that abuse has no gender, that you won't get away with lying about someone in an attempt to destroy them.

It's a positive message for all of us that have suffered, or are suffering, with abuse or false allegations.

Have hope, as justice can be served.

This is so rubbish - painting a false narrative. The world watch the trial and there is unlimited amounts of evidence she is a toxic, narcissist, and basically pure evil. And literally 0 evidence or ANY sort he did anything wrong. In fact it proved he was a victim.

Yes - men can be victims - and yes Johnny did the world a service by bringing that to the public eye.

So the fact this is such a 1 sided narrative - ignoring the whole situation and trying to rewrite history - is a disgrace.

They try to paint her as a broke victim - she literally victimized him and then blackmailed him out of money, houses and cars, using the fact he is a man as the reason he would lose.

Amber deserves to nothing else but to grow old alone and broke. Simple.

This was certainly an attempt to sway and/or convince the public opinion of a proven liar. This was one-sided with little of the proven court case facts and evidence presented. The PR machine at work attempting to push a narrative. I suggest looking at the UK court case which had nothing to do with Amber winning as this was a case of the Sun vs Johnny Depp. I suggest to watch the entire US trial and not snippets provided by Youtube channels for the whole truth. Men are domestically abused as well as women, let's stop believing all women and start listening to the facts; innocent until proven guilty.

Johnny's story is full of Amber's story. I expected to see a lot more about Johnny's side but it was mostly about Amber's claims stated as facts. It seems the whole documentary is supposed to be about Amber's side.

I'm a documentary filmmaker and have been creating and co-creating documentaries for years. Johnny vs Amber is like watching a mainstream media news segment (think FOX) - highly biased poilitically, instead of presenting actual facts.

As documentary filmmakers, we are essentially investigative journalists. At least that's what GOOD documentary creators are supposed to be. We leave our opinions and biases at the door and create content that presents facts. This is to allow the viewer to make up their own mind about what to believe - after all facts have been presented to them.

This filmmaker left out critical information which would allow the viewer to use their intelligence in coming to their own conclusion. Instead, the content presented here was missing factual information. This was done intentionally. It is evident the filmmaker behind this "documentary" is an Amber Heard fan and believes Johnny Depp is an abuser.

If you are an Amber Heard fan and believe Johnny Depp is an abuser, then this mini series is for you.