When a tech blogger lands an interview with a tech guru and stops an attack on him, he finds a mysterious ring that takes him back 57 seconds into the past.When a tech blogger lands an interview with a tech guru and stops an attack on him, he finds a mysterious ring that takes him back 57 seconds into the past.When a tech blogger lands an interview with a tech guru and stops an attack on him, he finds a mysterious ring that takes him back 57 seconds into the past.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I didn't like anything about this picture save maybe the possible potential for the story line. There were really no redeeming features to this film that I could find at any point during the development of the story. The main characters portrayal of his stupidity was only exceeded by his bad acting in general. In fact none of the characters had any credibility at all throughout.
The last scene in the aircraft was really pathetic from all aspects of this production.
The director should definitely keep his day job. I'm not a Hollywood critic just someone who has over many decades discovered what is a good movie from a bad movie.
Especially when one of my favorite actors Mr Morgan Freeman is involved.
He is far too good an actor to have been associated with this production at all.
Why he would have taken on this project to begin with is mystery to me?
The last scene in the aircraft was really pathetic from all aspects of this production.
The director should definitely keep his day job. I'm not a Hollywood critic just someone who has over many decades discovered what is a good movie from a bad movie.
Especially when one of my favorite actors Mr Morgan Freeman is involved.
He is far too good an actor to have been associated with this production at all.
Why he would have taken on this project to begin with is mystery to me?
Fooling time has a price. If not, just ask Josh Hutcherson, starring of this entertaining and fun science fiction thriller in which his character, thanks to a new ring, manages to go back 57 seconds in time, something that ends up becoming a real drug and with the participation of an enigmatic scientist Morgan Freeman as a technology guru. Blogger Franklin Fausti (Josh Hutcherson of Hunger Games) thwarts an attack against Anton Burrell (Morgan Freeman of Seven), a visionary tech guru he has been given a chance to interview. With Burrell's help, Franklin decides to use a ring to take revenge against the pharmaceutical company run by Sig Thorenson (Greg Germann) that was responsible for his sister's death. Along the way, Franklin falls in love for Jala (Lovie Simone). Rewind the past !. Avenge the future !.
An amusing film full of micro-time travels, temporal paradoxes, fantasy, impressive action scenes, unbridled ambition and dreams of grandeur. The film shows us that technological advances can be a danger if they are not in the right hands. The issue is simple and fantastic: our starring finds a ring that Burrell dropped and discovers that it gives its wearer the ability to travel 57 seconds into the past. The story follows the same premise as the much better ¨Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time¨ (2010) by Michael Apted , the latter was full of oriental adventures, swordplay and unlimited action. However, this 57 seconds is hampered by a very small budget, a number of implausible situations, and seems more like a B-movie. The only standout is the always excellent Morgan Freeman, in a minor role, which is why he is clearly wasted playing a wizard of modern technology. The real protagonist is Josh Hutcherson, who gives a mediocre performance as the determined young man who gets into a lot of trouble when he finds a powerful ring while seeking revenge for the death of his sister. Josh Hutcherson gives a so-so acting, not providing the necessary enthusiasm to carry the film. This young actor is building a good career that includes several successes and some failures. Josh Hutcherson may have gotten his big break when he was cast as Peeta Mellark in the Hunger Games franchise, but he'd actually been a staple in Hollywood since he was very young. His most recent starring role is in this Sci-fi film "57 seconds (2023)", but he's been in tons of other movies as well, dating all the way back to his days as a child actor. Among his films we can mention the following: Hunger Games saga, Journey to the Center of the Earth, Across the River and Into the Trees, Burn, The disaster artist, Escobar: Paradise Lost, and Five nights at Freddy's that's based on the video game of the same name, among others.
The motion picture was mediocrely directed by Rusty Cundieff and was shot in Lafayette, LA in April 2022. Rusty is a director and actor, known for acting and shooting, both TV and cinema, such as: Chappelle's Show (2003), Fear of a Black Hat (1993) White Water (2015), Christmas in harmony (2021) and Creepshow series. Rating: 5/10, average film. Only for die-hard Morgan Freeman fans despite his short and already hackneyed performance.
An amusing film full of micro-time travels, temporal paradoxes, fantasy, impressive action scenes, unbridled ambition and dreams of grandeur. The film shows us that technological advances can be a danger if they are not in the right hands. The issue is simple and fantastic: our starring finds a ring that Burrell dropped and discovers that it gives its wearer the ability to travel 57 seconds into the past. The story follows the same premise as the much better ¨Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time¨ (2010) by Michael Apted , the latter was full of oriental adventures, swordplay and unlimited action. However, this 57 seconds is hampered by a very small budget, a number of implausible situations, and seems more like a B-movie. The only standout is the always excellent Morgan Freeman, in a minor role, which is why he is clearly wasted playing a wizard of modern technology. The real protagonist is Josh Hutcherson, who gives a mediocre performance as the determined young man who gets into a lot of trouble when he finds a powerful ring while seeking revenge for the death of his sister. Josh Hutcherson gives a so-so acting, not providing the necessary enthusiasm to carry the film. This young actor is building a good career that includes several successes and some failures. Josh Hutcherson may have gotten his big break when he was cast as Peeta Mellark in the Hunger Games franchise, but he'd actually been a staple in Hollywood since he was very young. His most recent starring role is in this Sci-fi film "57 seconds (2023)", but he's been in tons of other movies as well, dating all the way back to his days as a child actor. Among his films we can mention the following: Hunger Games saga, Journey to the Center of the Earth, Across the River and Into the Trees, Burn, The disaster artist, Escobar: Paradise Lost, and Five nights at Freddy's that's based on the video game of the same name, among others.
The motion picture was mediocrely directed by Rusty Cundieff and was shot in Lafayette, LA in April 2022. Rusty is a director and actor, known for acting and shooting, both TV and cinema, such as: Chappelle's Show (2003), Fear of a Black Hat (1993) White Water (2015), Christmas in harmony (2021) and Creepshow series. Rating: 5/10, average film. Only for die-hard Morgan Freeman fans despite his short and already hackneyed performance.
This movie is alright, but derivative.
If you like the concept, but want to see a much better movie, check out "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, 2010".
The acting is much better, but I don't want to totally dismiss this film.
The concept is top drawer! Combining AI with a time device, would be a total game changer.
The AI would detect danger at a speed humans aren't capable of, then throw you back 57 seconds to avoid the danger, either manually or by the AI.
It's a genius concept, used a lot in the film, less the AI, he does everything manually.
I would recommend this film on the concept alone, however, it's a waste of Morgan Freeman's talent.
But hey, everybody can use an extra paycheck, LOL!
If you like the concept, but want to see a much better movie, check out "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, 2010".
The acting is much better, but I don't want to totally dismiss this film.
The concept is top drawer! Combining AI with a time device, would be a total game changer.
The AI would detect danger at a speed humans aren't capable of, then throw you back 57 seconds to avoid the danger, either manually or by the AI.
It's a genius concept, used a lot in the film, less the AI, he does everything manually.
I would recommend this film on the concept alone, however, it's a waste of Morgan Freeman's talent.
But hey, everybody can use an extra paycheck, LOL!
Wow. I'm mind-blown.
Do you know when you are watching a science fiction movie or any movie really and you have those moments of amazement thinking "Wow! I feel like I'm getting smarter after every scene!", "This is so well written!" "This is so ingenious!"? Well, unfortunately, the complete opposite just happened...
It's remarkable how the decision makers involved in this project were able to set up this big scope involving as characters apparently two of the worlds most influential beings, the tech genius entrepreneur! And the pharmaceutical giant!, with the MIT graduate 'chosen one'!, and the movie be so ridden by basically idiotic/childish decisions and set ups. Everything just feels relentlessly cheap. How contradictory.
How to suspend your disbelief when the movie is set within such a wealthy and high-stakes scenario but you have everything surrounding your production (except Morgan Freeman) being not up to par? It just makes no sense.
Next time just tune/humble the whole thing down so that you don't have to simplify every plot point because you don't have the budget or the technical team/energy to make it.
Do you know when you are watching a science fiction movie or any movie really and you have those moments of amazement thinking "Wow! I feel like I'm getting smarter after every scene!", "This is so well written!" "This is so ingenious!"? Well, unfortunately, the complete opposite just happened...
It's remarkable how the decision makers involved in this project were able to set up this big scope involving as characters apparently two of the worlds most influential beings, the tech genius entrepreneur! And the pharmaceutical giant!, with the MIT graduate 'chosen one'!, and the movie be so ridden by basically idiotic/childish decisions and set ups. Everything just feels relentlessly cheap. How contradictory.
How to suspend your disbelief when the movie is set within such a wealthy and high-stakes scenario but you have everything surrounding your production (except Morgan Freeman) being not up to par? It just makes no sense.
Next time just tune/humble the whole thing down so that you don't have to simplify every plot point because you don't have the budget or the technical team/energy to make it.
This film is just terrible. The premise is okay but the main character is poorly written. The way he acts and his motivations are that of a 12 year old. This is as bad as that lame Jason Momoa film "sweet girl" where every point they want to portray is so on the nose that it all ends up stinking. Although I couldn't make it beyond 20 minutes of that tripe, I did make it further on this one. This script really needed another 6 or 7 rewrites. Maybe this script was written by ChatGPT? No? Or maybe it needed to be? This could've been so much better if it had been properly script doctored but we will never know.
Did you know
- TriviaThe film was shot in Lafayette, LA in April 2022.
- GoofsAt Cogan's grille the audience is told that a bullet grazed Franklin's right hand. It was bleeding at the conference too. Yet, when he takes off the bandage, his hand is completely fine.
- Quotes
Franklin Fox: They say that life flashes before your eyes when you have a near-death experience, but I only saw my last three months.
- SoundtracksCreepin
Written by Cade Ellis
Performed by Cade Ellis
Produced by Oscar Beats
- How long is 57 Seconds?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- 57 Segundos Atrás
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $1,055,487
- Runtime1 hour 39 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content