IMDb RATING
4.6/10
3.5K
YOUR RATING
Afflicted with a mysterious disease after surviving an overdose, a woman returns to her childhood home to confront her personal demons but instead discovers a real one.Afflicted with a mysterious disease after surviving an overdose, a woman returns to her childhood home to confront her personal demons but instead discovers a real one.Afflicted with a mysterious disease after surviving an overdose, a woman returns to her childhood home to confront her personal demons but instead discovers a real one.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
There's a really great core idea here and an overall solid story that with just a few minor tweaks could've made an absolute classic, but there's something hard to define that's not quite worked.
I can't figure out if it's the characters, the acting, the editing, or what, but for some reason I couldn't connect and wasn't absorbed on an emotional level - there was no character I was rooting for, none I was rooting against. Someone died and it was acknowledged, but I didn't care.
And if I'm not feeling something emotionally, it loses a major part of the battle for me. The brain parts of the people behind this got everything just about right, but the heart parts I think got left at home.
I can't figure out if it's the characters, the acting, the editing, or what, but for some reason I couldn't connect and wasn't absorbed on an emotional level - there was no character I was rooting for, none I was rooting against. Someone died and it was acknowledged, but I didn't care.
And if I'm not feeling something emotionally, it loses a major part of the battle for me. The brain parts of the people behind this got everything just about right, but the heart parts I think got left at home.
It's a different attempt. But a very unpleasant movie to watch. Writing is okish. Not every character is well defined. But this movie isn't about character arc and stuff.
Not exactly sure what is the mental trauma the writer / director went into to make such a movie? I can keep abusing this movie
But funny part is - I kept watching it :D. When a movie keeps you engaged then it is a success.
Ignore the negative reviews. Keep your mind very broad and go into this movie's atmosphere and it will give you some unpleasantness back. I would say that is also a kind of entertainment.
Make sure no kids are there nearby when you watch this movie.
Not exactly sure what is the mental trauma the writer / director went into to make such a movie? I can keep abusing this movie
But funny part is - I kept watching it :D. When a movie keeps you engaged then it is a success.
Ignore the negative reviews. Keep your mind very broad and go into this movie's atmosphere and it will give you some unpleasantness back. I would say that is also a kind of entertainment.
Make sure no kids are there nearby when you watch this movie.
To get that out of the way .. i rate this movie to be a bit above average.
If i wanted to describe a feeling in one word .. i would probably go with : uncomfortable
A bit like a Lars von Trier movie, but only half way.
Acting is good - although not very nuanced. Cinematography is sometimes good .. but not stellar - and characters act in a very artificial way .. only to support the plot, not in any way realistic (on the basis of the supernatural that is going on)
The CGI was poor ... i mean, Playstation 2 cutscene poor. It was kind of rare .. and i wonder why the movie did not use practical effects .. those would not have been too hard .. and may not have broken immersion as much as those really terrible CGI scenes.
All in all, it was worth watching - for me. But other than that ... a fairly forgettable movie without much depth or meaning (well, unless you are into rural folklore of that region or so .. maybe than there is more to get from it)
If i wanted to describe a feeling in one word .. i would probably go with : uncomfortable
A bit like a Lars von Trier movie, but only half way.
Acting is good - although not very nuanced. Cinematography is sometimes good .. but not stellar - and characters act in a very artificial way .. only to support the plot, not in any way realistic (on the basis of the supernatural that is going on)
The CGI was poor ... i mean, Playstation 2 cutscene poor. It was kind of rare .. and i wonder why the movie did not use practical effects .. those would not have been too hard .. and may not have broken immersion as much as those really terrible CGI scenes.
All in all, it was worth watching - for me. But other than that ... a fairly forgettable movie without much depth or meaning (well, unless you are into rural folklore of that region or so .. maybe than there is more to get from it)
Not a movie for everybody or indeed anybody but if you want something different then it is worth a watch..
Like it or not, it's admirable that the movie is totally weird and refuses to follow any formula but it's own. It does not even care about alienating people, it is that daring.
During the short run-time it takes all sorts of twists and turns and you never know what will happen. It might at the end of the day try to much and gets lost in it's own story. But Kate Dickie is as usually great in another eccentric unhinged lady role. Going all in, she knows exactly what kind of movie it is....
During the short run-time it takes all sorts of twists and turns and you never know what will happen. It might at the end of the day try to much and gets lost in it's own story. But Kate Dickie is as usually great in another eccentric unhinged lady role. Going all in, she knows exactly what kind of movie it is....
Wasn't sure what to make of this, and in many ways it's a few different films put together. It's a mother/daughter relationship drama, it's an addiction drama, it's a folk horror and it's a body horror.
The actors are tremendous - Kate Dickie is always good value and is deliciously insincere.
Jemima Rooper manages to make a pretty unsympathetic character somewhat likeable, though that is a bit of a flaw in the film.
The cinematography is lovely - the British countryside has never looked so desolate or haunting.
The music and sound design is incredibly atmospheric, and works in conjunction with the editing to really keep you uneasy throughout.
Perhaps by the end of the film one too many ideas have been thrown into the pot, but I really enjoyed the journey and would happily recommend it.
The actors are tremendous - Kate Dickie is always good value and is deliciously insincere.
Jemima Rooper manages to make a pretty unsympathetic character somewhat likeable, though that is a bit of a flaw in the film.
The cinematography is lovely - the British countryside has never looked so desolate or haunting.
The music and sound design is incredibly atmospheric, and works in conjunction with the editing to really keep you uneasy throughout.
Perhaps by the end of the film one too many ideas have been thrown into the pot, but I really enjoyed the journey and would happily recommend it.
Did you know
- TriviaThe film's original title was "Wormeater", but was changed to "Matriarch" after network executives felt it would put off the female audience.
- How long is Matriarch?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Matriarcado
- Filming locations
- Bristol, England, UK(on location)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 25 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content