Rex Romanski, a suave playboy with all the right moves and undisputed Disco King, is in for a wild ride as a perfect one-night stand triggers a curse and a visit from hell's blackest demons.... Read allRex Romanski, a suave playboy with all the right moves and undisputed Disco King, is in for a wild ride as a perfect one-night stand triggers a curse and a visit from hell's blackest demons. Now, make way for the Disco Exorcist.Rex Romanski, a suave playboy with all the right moves and undisputed Disco King, is in for a wild ride as a perfect one-night stand triggers a curse and a visit from hell's blackest demons. Now, make way for the Disco Exorcist.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Ruth Mahala Sullivan
- Rita Marie
- (as Ruth Sullivan)
Christopher L. Ferreira
- Disco Dork #2
- (as Christopher Ferreira)
- …
Alexander J. Andriulli
- Disco Stud
- (as Alexander Andriulli)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The most film I have had at the movies in a long time! A fantastic throwback to grind house cinema.
Great performances from Michael Reed and Sarah Nicklin and the entire cast. There isn;t a person on screen who doesn;t give it their all. Therir performances are fun and full of imagination.
Great standout role from Chris Ferreira as well. He stands out.
Director Griffin really shines here and it's so much fun it cannot be contained. The script is fun and quick and full of joy.It's hard to find a film with this much love put into it out there.
Please see Disco Exorcist. Buy a copy. It's well worth your time!
Great performances from Michael Reed and Sarah Nicklin and the entire cast. There isn;t a person on screen who doesn;t give it their all. Therir performances are fun and full of imagination.
Great standout role from Chris Ferreira as well. He stands out.
Director Griffin really shines here and it's so much fun it cannot be contained. The script is fun and quick and full of joy.It's hard to find a film with this much love put into it out there.
Please see Disco Exorcist. Buy a copy. It's well worth your time!
If you only look at the title and you have seen the trailer then you know that you are in a treat of exploitation. By saying that I mean, if you think that you are going to see a horror flick full of gore and blood forget it. This is way back memory lane when grindhouses galore.
The way this flick was filmed and been edited was so typical 70's style. Naturally it was shot with camera's nowadays but they added the scratches afterwards like you see on those old flicks. The use of lighting was also done like in those days with green lights when there is horror for example. Everything worked out fine on that department. The colours being washed and the bad sound editing, you know what I mean. The use of 'Shot Missing' wasn't that funny but okay, it was done back then so no probs with it. So far so good.
You can easily see that the makers do know their stuff of the seventies. When we are at a porn shooting just look at the posters behind the director, The Teacher, so 70's. And that they used roller-skates in their porn reminded me also of those old roller flicks. The way the opening credit was done was also an ode to the genre.
The acting itself was believable too. naturally for some it will be over the top but if you know your stuff then, again, those old ones had that too. The story do falls a bit down halfway the flick but picks up fast again. I can't understand why Michael reed or Ruth Sullivan hasn't made it further in the business.
But then the flick itself. There is naturally gore in it and red stuff. But it is all added with some humour on it. I won't spoil it all but you will see what I mean, just watch the end. There is one shot that really pulls out the intestines and I must say that the effects used were really good. Don't take it all too seriously, the shoot for a porn flick do have some comedy elements. But you have heard me say a few times porn. Don't expect to see some porn, that isn't in it but there is a lot of nudity in it. Maybe one complaint on that part, they all had shaved armpits, something not done back then. But there's full frontal male and female nudity and so much gratuitous nudity that if you love Kleenex you will need a package to wipe your smut away. The possession of one of the girls does look like acting but again go back into your collection and see that it was done that way. I guess a lot won't understand this flick but for those who dig seventies sleaze I surely recommend it. I enjoyed it a lot and made me think of Boogeyman (1980) or trash like that. It isn't a roughie just pure exploitation sleaze.
Gore 2/5 Nudity 4/5 Story 3/5 Effects 3/5 Comedy 1/5
The way this flick was filmed and been edited was so typical 70's style. Naturally it was shot with camera's nowadays but they added the scratches afterwards like you see on those old flicks. The use of lighting was also done like in those days with green lights when there is horror for example. Everything worked out fine on that department. The colours being washed and the bad sound editing, you know what I mean. The use of 'Shot Missing' wasn't that funny but okay, it was done back then so no probs with it. So far so good.
You can easily see that the makers do know their stuff of the seventies. When we are at a porn shooting just look at the posters behind the director, The Teacher, so 70's. And that they used roller-skates in their porn reminded me also of those old roller flicks. The way the opening credit was done was also an ode to the genre.
The acting itself was believable too. naturally for some it will be over the top but if you know your stuff then, again, those old ones had that too. The story do falls a bit down halfway the flick but picks up fast again. I can't understand why Michael reed or Ruth Sullivan hasn't made it further in the business.
But then the flick itself. There is naturally gore in it and red stuff. But it is all added with some humour on it. I won't spoil it all but you will see what I mean, just watch the end. There is one shot that really pulls out the intestines and I must say that the effects used were really good. Don't take it all too seriously, the shoot for a porn flick do have some comedy elements. But you have heard me say a few times porn. Don't expect to see some porn, that isn't in it but there is a lot of nudity in it. Maybe one complaint on that part, they all had shaved armpits, something not done back then. But there's full frontal male and female nudity and so much gratuitous nudity that if you love Kleenex you will need a package to wipe your smut away. The possession of one of the girls does look like acting but again go back into your collection and see that it was done that way. I guess a lot won't understand this flick but for those who dig seventies sleaze I surely recommend it. I enjoyed it a lot and made me think of Boogeyman (1980) or trash like that. It isn't a roughie just pure exploitation sleaze.
Gore 2/5 Nudity 4/5 Story 3/5 Effects 3/5 Comedy 1/5
Picked this up as it seemed like a fun "so bad it's good" film in a similar vain to 'the room' yet it ended up being simply "so bad it's bad".
I would go so far as to say this is literally unwatchable; any of the cheese, humour or charm you would expect from a low budget, 70s soaked horror movie is completely absent. None of the 'jokes' land, the acting is stiff and awkward, not in a funny way, just in a second-hand embarrassment kind of way.
If you're into gratuitous nudity and get enjoyment out of seriously rubbish schlock then you might just get something out of this one but for me it was severely disappointing (despite the low bar of comparison) and will not be revisited.
I would go so far as to say this is literally unwatchable; any of the cheese, humour or charm you would expect from a low budget, 70s soaked horror movie is completely absent. None of the 'jokes' land, the acting is stiff and awkward, not in a funny way, just in a second-hand embarrassment kind of way.
If you're into gratuitous nudity and get enjoyment out of seriously rubbish schlock then you might just get something out of this one but for me it was severely disappointing (despite the low bar of comparison) and will not be revisited.
Disco dance king, Rex Romanski (Michael Reed) is busy dancing, loving, and snorting his way along, minding his own business, when he gets cursed by a jealous loverwith voodoo powers.
Rex must now perform an exorcism or face a horrible demise!
THE DISCO EXORCIST is a low-low-budget film that manages to parody the disco era, while poking -pardon the pun!- fun at the porn industry. All, while being a decent horror-satire.
If idiotic splatter comedies are your thing, then this one should get your lava lamp bubbling!...
Rex must now perform an exorcism or face a horrible demise!
THE DISCO EXORCIST is a low-low-budget film that manages to parody the disco era, while poking -pardon the pun!- fun at the porn industry. All, while being a decent horror-satire.
If idiotic splatter comedies are your thing, then this one should get your lava lamp bubbling!...
In goofy enjoyable mash of disco flicks and 70s demon films, Rex Romanski pisses off a witch who rains havoc on his playboy lifestyle. There is a lot of flat humor and a terrible fake noise filter throughout the film but a few great jokes make it through as well as some ambitious color and lighting.
I rate it a "fuck it, watch it" Bonus random natural regular titties throughout is a plus
I rate it a "fuck it, watch it" Bonus random natural regular titties throughout is a plus
Did you know
- TriviaSarah Nicklin watched 70's porn movies to research her role as adult film actress Amoreena Jones.
- ConnectionsReferences Hawaii police d'état (1968)
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $20,000 (estimated)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content