2 reviews
Okay, so after one minute I knew it was going to be bad, but how bad? Yes, that was the question.
I don't mind bad films as long as they've a redeeming quality, however, the thirty three minutes I managed to endure, with nothing having happened save ludicrous serial rape-murders, too badly acted to shock/entertain anyone, trying to chug along with the god-awful "story" proved way too much for me. I'm pretty sure it'll be the same for most others too.
So, bad acting, bad dialogue, a nonsensical flow of scenes, and a plot highly unlikely to have improved, means that this film gets the 1/10 rating for me having turned it off.
For those curious (film-masochism, ouch!), the lead's meant to be some kind of ghost hunter and the main villain a ghostly killer. Or so I was led to believe by what I could sit through. They're probably all ghosts in a bad "twist" and the tiny fight scene in the beginning was woeful.
Gosh, why am I still typing - hasn't this trash taken up enough of my evening already?
I don't mind bad films as long as they've a redeeming quality, however, the thirty three minutes I managed to endure, with nothing having happened save ludicrous serial rape-murders, too badly acted to shock/entertain anyone, trying to chug along with the god-awful "story" proved way too much for me. I'm pretty sure it'll be the same for most others too.
So, bad acting, bad dialogue, a nonsensical flow of scenes, and a plot highly unlikely to have improved, means that this film gets the 1/10 rating for me having turned it off.
For those curious (film-masochism, ouch!), the lead's meant to be some kind of ghost hunter and the main villain a ghostly killer. Or so I was led to believe by what I could sit through. They're probably all ghosts in a bad "twist" and the tiny fight scene in the beginning was woeful.
Gosh, why am I still typing - hasn't this trash taken up enough of my evening already?
- grandmastersik
- Aug 19, 2010
- Permalink
- dbborroughs
- Jan 22, 2011
- Permalink