Hired to probe seaside village attacks, mutant monster hunter Geralt unravels an age-old conflict between humans and sea people that threatens war between kingdoms. Aided by allies, he must ... Read allHired to probe seaside village attacks, mutant monster hunter Geralt unravels an age-old conflict between humans and sea people that threatens war between kingdoms. Aided by allies, he must solve the mystery before hostilities escalate.Hired to probe seaside village attacks, mutant monster hunter Geralt unravels an age-old conflict between humans and sea people that threatens war between kingdoms. Aided by allies, he must solve the mystery before hostilities escalate.
Doug Cockle
- Geralt
- (voice)
Joey Batey
- Jaskier
- (voice)
- …
Anya Chalotra
- Yennefer
- (voice)
Christina Wren
- Essi Daven
- (voice)
Emily Carey
- Sh'eenaz
- (voice)
Camrus Johnson
- Agloval
- (voice)
Simon Templeman
- King Usveldt
- (voice)
Mallory Jansen
- Melusina
- (voice)
- …
Ramon Tikaram
- King Basim
- (voice)
Kari Wahlgren
- Zmarra
- (voice)
- …
Stephen Fu
- Deroua
- (voice)
George Ackles
- Drouhard
- (voice)
Brian George
- Barkeep
- (voice)
- …
Maury Sterling
- Berat
- (voice)
Darin De Paul
- Captain
- (voice)
Valerie Rose Lohman
- Young Essi
- (voice)
- (as Valerie Roz Lohman)
Featured reviews
Something has happened to the Witcher. Somewhere along the way, he has become a side character.
Story: It's not well developed but is serviceable.
Characters: As mentioned, somehow the focus is no longer on our hero - where it should always be - and it's not even on recurring characters important to our hero. This was a major error.
Animation: Passable but clearly on a very limited budget. Had the story been very good, this would have been easily forgivable.
Sound/Music/Voice: Low quality. The voice actors aren't very good, unfortunately. There's not much emoting, if any.
Verdict: Unless you're a die-hard Witcher fan, this anime is not worth your time. I gave six stars, mostly for nostalgia.
Story: It's not well developed but is serviceable.
Characters: As mentioned, somehow the focus is no longer on our hero - where it should always be - and it's not even on recurring characters important to our hero. This was a major error.
Animation: Passable but clearly on a very limited budget. Had the story been very good, this would have been easily forgivable.
Sound/Music/Voice: Low quality. The voice actors aren't very good, unfortunately. There's not much emoting, if any.
Verdict: Unless you're a die-hard Witcher fan, this anime is not worth your time. I gave six stars, mostly for nostalgia.
I haven't read the books, but I've watched anything Witcher related out there and I'm a big fan of the games. Although the fighting scenes with Geralt are perfect and entertaining, I feel like the entire thing lacked the emotion I'm used to with the games. The music in the background was barely audible, which took away a lot of the tension and feeling it usually creates. What you can hear the most is the sword slashing and voice acting (including breathing and whatnot), or other times just complete silence (which is usually used to create a certain atmosphere) that seems out of place. The story is pretty predictable and too much Little Mermaid like. The reasoning behind the characters' actions is too simple, in a way that makes you think "that's all there is to it?".
I think it had potential to be something good, even with the story being written as it was, if the rest of it managed to pull your heart into it by creating that Witcher feel. As it stands, it felt a bit disconnected or lacking at times. It was kinda boring because it completely missed the mark to be honest...
I think it had potential to be something good, even with the story being written as it was, if the rest of it managed to pull your heart into it by creating that Witcher feel. As it stands, it felt a bit disconnected or lacking at times. It was kinda boring because it completely missed the mark to be honest...
I had high hopes for this. Thinking back on the damage they've done to The Witcher IP, this was naive. I re-read the short story that gives the movie its inspiration, and found myself, again, in awe of Sapokski's writing and characterization. In my opinion, it's one of Sapkowski's best short stories. Now, I don't want to be one of those people who harps on about an adaptation not being faithful to the original, but Netflix had so much to work with here. Sapkowski's writing is full of nuance and depth and pathos - everything this adaptation is lacking. The movie goes for cheap, surface-level fantasy action and vandalizes the unique creative depth and character-work that makes Sapkowski's writing, at its best, exceptional. At its best, Netflix has been able to capture some of this - I think back to Renfri from the first episode of The Witcher. But in large part, Netflix has failed to capture what makes the IP special. This is just the latest example.
As books and games fan I have to say. Netflix still doesn't understand what Witcher is even about. They made it another Hollywood movie with lot's of fights and very little amount of dialogue. Everything that made the short story so emotional and beautiful in the book is gone here. Also, for the most part I was just bored and that's because Geralt is so overpowered here. He literally has all human-sized monsters on one hit. He killed at least 30 of the vodniks. We simply aren't worried for the main characters. As its own thing this is just another generic animated movie with a generic plot. As a Witcher adaptation, it's just poor.
I understand the reservations people have with The Witcher: Nightmare of the Wolf - which I really liked, but that isn't the case -, but this production is by far a worst production than that animation. I wish I could brush it off by saying "what else could you expect from the same two writers that also wrote the Netflix series?" however this was proved wrong with the before mentioned animation, also written by one of the writers of the show - even though Beau DeMayo wrote another great show in the X-Men '97 adaptation - or maybe he is an exception and it is not wrong to assume that re-hiring writers from the Netflix series is a bad idea.
However, something is clear, even for the people that have not read the books, you can clearly tell what comes from the books (Sword of Destiny) and what was adapted from Netflix writers. There is even this part from the books that shows how witty Essi in their investigation, but she was robbed to create a "cool scene".
Overall, this adaptation of the short story "A Little Sacrifice" does way more harm than Vesemir's prequel did.
As a side note, why is the voice acting from Essi so weird?
However, something is clear, even for the people that have not read the books, you can clearly tell what comes from the books (Sword of Destiny) and what was adapted from Netflix writers. There is even this part from the books that shows how witty Essi in their investigation, but she was robbed to create a "cool scene".
Overall, this adaptation of the short story "A Little Sacrifice" does way more harm than Vesemir's prequel did.
As a side note, why is the voice acting from Essi so weird?
Did you know
- ConnectionsSpin-off from The Witcher (2019)
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- The Witcher: Sirenas de las profundidades
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 31 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for The Witcher: Les Sirènes des abysses (2025)?
Answer