Who Killed the KLF?
- 2021
- 1h 28m
IMDb RATING
7.2/10
1.2K
YOUR RATING
"Who Killed the KLF?" explores the rise and fall of the KLF in the 1980s and 1990s, touching upon themes that perfectly capture the 21st century zeitgeist. A tale as intriguing as it is bonk... Read all"Who Killed the KLF?" explores the rise and fall of the KLF in the 1980s and 1990s, touching upon themes that perfectly capture the 21st century zeitgeist. A tale as intriguing as it is bonkers""Who Killed the KLF?" explores the rise and fall of the KLF in the 1980s and 1990s, touching upon themes that perfectly capture the 21st century zeitgeist. A tale as intriguing as it is bonkers"
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Bill Drummond
- Self
- (archive footage)
Jimmy Cauty
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as Jimi Cauty)
Paula Yates
- Self
- (archive footage)
Pete Waterman
- Self
- (archive footage)
Kerry Wendell Thornley
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as Kerry Thornley)
Janet Street-Porter
- Self
- (archive footage)
Tony Wilson
- Self
- (archive footage)
The KLF
- Themselves
- (archive footage)
Tammy Wynette
- Self
- (archive footage)
Featured reviews
I don't understand the point of this documentary, it brings nothing new and is just boring. Your better off reading on wiki about the band and your find in 5 mins of reading. Why we're your time watching this for 1hr 40 mins you'll never get back.
I dont get it. I was there at the time and I think the KLF only meant something to the indie music press because at the time the indie music press just didnt get the rave scene. They could latch onto the KLF, but on the acid house/rave scene KLF were a bit of a joke. We all remember them as the wacky guys that burnt a million quid, well thats a bit embarrassing now isnt it? This documentary is just hyped up nonsense. A sort of 80's/90's Spinal Tap, but not funny.
If you loved the KLF and their antics, this is a great film to watch. If you're not sure who they are, this is a story about a great friendship and the twisted surreal path they took in the 90's. It ask what real success looks like? Questions the power of money? Media? Also , what is art and who decides it's value? How easily an industry can be manipulated? This film may leave you with more questions than answers, but I found it a delight to watch with details about the duos exploits I did not know and to gain an insight into what influenced their ethos and their actions. This is truly independent film!
Is this movie worth watching? No.
How was the plot? Boring.
Was the budget enough? Yes.
What is this movie saying about our world? Stop techno.
What is your emotional response to this movie? Yawn.
What did this movie make me feel? Bored.
What moments, character, or ideas resonated with me while watching this movie? The end.
What thoughts does this movie spark in me? Run.
What themes are present in this movie? Greed.
Why would someone want to watch this film? Because they didn't change the channel fast enough.
What is one good or cool thing I could say about this movie to someone else? It is in engineering.
What does this movie have to say about the big story we are in? Stop watching movies.
What does it make me think about? Going home.
How was the plot? Boring.
Was the budget enough? Yes.
What is this movie saying about our world? Stop techno.
What is your emotional response to this movie? Yawn.
What did this movie make me feel? Bored.
What moments, character, or ideas resonated with me while watching this movie? The end.
What thoughts does this movie spark in me? Run.
What themes are present in this movie? Greed.
Why would someone want to watch this film? Because they didn't change the channel fast enough.
What is one good or cool thing I could say about this movie to someone else? It is in engineering.
What does this movie have to say about the big story we are in? Stop watching movies.
What does it make me think about? Going home.
I was keen to see this in the cinema but it didnt really appear anywhere that I was able to attend so it was a surprise when this arrived online. Its been a while since I last thought about it I had to check this was the new documentary and not just a re-release of the burning of the cash film.
These style of docs seem to be made from offcuts of recorded dialogue and archival footage, which on the basis means they can be made by anyone at anytime about anybody, with little input from the bands. As such its basically a montage with some structure while emotive music plays in the background with the odd scene of actors pretending to be the band in unusual places.
The pros are that we get some new information about the band, which is pretty much it.
The cons are greater in number. For a start the documentary is apparently suggesting the KLF were the first to use samples, in 1987, as if hip hop didn't exist. Hip hop was almost entirely samples based music with a few drum machines. Those that were not like stetsasonic were rare. When the band actually state they were trying to make a hip hop record.
There is some background info on their philosophy but like almost every topic its very surface level, the interview footage doesnt go into any great depth its mainly soundbytes.
And while that is the main issue, lack of depth the other is it entirely fails to provide an explanation for anything, in particular the burning of the million pounds. This appears to be a deliberate act of self harm on the part of the group and they obviously have never recovered from it. The telling statement that one of them was prone to thoughts of self harming was their idea of chopping off their hand to throw on the audience which is documented in this title. There is no psychological analysis of the pair which is exactly what this documentary lacked and probably what both of the guys needed to come to terms and gain insight into some of their self destructive actions. To simply put it down to art is lazy as well as an avoidance of accountability.
In terms of burning the cash however, cash is burned on a daily basis when it reaches its end of usefulness, which kind of undermines their act of burning their money. It would have been burned anyway.
The ending brings this all home as it basically ends without resolving anything, it seemed to end 15 mins too early.
I am sure this is a better doc to be made about the KLF however this one will have to do for fans for now.
Apparently the KLF are quite happy with this doc, most likely because it doesnt actually answer anything......which suits their agenda quite well.
These style of docs seem to be made from offcuts of recorded dialogue and archival footage, which on the basis means they can be made by anyone at anytime about anybody, with little input from the bands. As such its basically a montage with some structure while emotive music plays in the background with the odd scene of actors pretending to be the band in unusual places.
The pros are that we get some new information about the band, which is pretty much it.
The cons are greater in number. For a start the documentary is apparently suggesting the KLF were the first to use samples, in 1987, as if hip hop didn't exist. Hip hop was almost entirely samples based music with a few drum machines. Those that were not like stetsasonic were rare. When the band actually state they were trying to make a hip hop record.
There is some background info on their philosophy but like almost every topic its very surface level, the interview footage doesnt go into any great depth its mainly soundbytes.
And while that is the main issue, lack of depth the other is it entirely fails to provide an explanation for anything, in particular the burning of the million pounds. This appears to be a deliberate act of self harm on the part of the group and they obviously have never recovered from it. The telling statement that one of them was prone to thoughts of self harming was their idea of chopping off their hand to throw on the audience which is documented in this title. There is no psychological analysis of the pair which is exactly what this documentary lacked and probably what both of the guys needed to come to terms and gain insight into some of their self destructive actions. To simply put it down to art is lazy as well as an avoidance of accountability.
In terms of burning the cash however, cash is burned on a daily basis when it reaches its end of usefulness, which kind of undermines their act of burning their money. It would have been burned anyway.
The ending brings this all home as it basically ends without resolving anything, it seemed to end 15 mins too early.
I am sure this is a better doc to be made about the KLF however this one will have to do for fans for now.
Apparently the KLF are quite happy with this doc, most likely because it doesnt actually answer anything......which suits their agenda quite well.
Did you know
- TriviaAccording to director Chris Atkins, The KLF was initially against the film but eventually approved it after seeing it - but pointed out two minor inaccuracies: Cauty had a complaint about one of the prop synths used in the reenactment scenes, while Drummond indicated that he was the production designer of the Illuminatus! stage play, not the stage manager as the film says.
- GoofsIn one reenactment a Roland MC-202 is used to trigger samples. The MC-202 does not have that capability.
- ConnectionsEdited into 23 Seconds to Eternity (2023)
- How long is Who Killed the KLF??Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Vem dödade the KLF?
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 28 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content