Encounter: UFO

This is a mix of reenactments, testimony from actual witnesses & experiencers (with actual video & pics), and expert commentary. There are a number of stories that I hadn't heard about before. So many shows just re-tell the same stories over and over. It's great to hear encounters I had not heard about previously. The witnesses are compelling. They come across as very credible and the stories they tell are intense. They're so amazing that they are difficult to believe. But you get no sense these people are crazy or lying. These are regular folk in extraordinary situations. They never asked for this or wanted this. If you are open minded and enjoy the subject, you will enjoy this show!

Making out things are UFO's when just light phenomena. Good job they don't get the northern lights 🙄.

Sensationalist low grade American TV

That is all...

Making out things are UFO's when just light phenomena. Good job they don't get the northern lights 🙄.

Sensationalist low grade American TV

Making out things are UFO's when just light phenomena. Good job they don't get the northern lights 🙄.

Sensationalist low grade American TV

Making out things are UFO's when just light phenomena. Good job they don't get the northern lights 🙄.

Sensationalist low grade American TV

Repeated due to min character requirement.

Terrible, there's cuts everywhere and loud music playing over people talking. Why? The whole show looks like a huge trailer. There is no one that tells any story. Basically three seconds of talk and then music and cut to another person. I haven't seen anyone talk for over five seconds.

Also why all the fake cgi? It kills the mystery and imagination with so much fake stuff. Do they think people who want to watch a a show like this are so duumb that they can't focus for more than five seconds?

You get way better quality from YouTube videos. Not even close.

Fire the editor and also fire the director.

UFOlogy is filled to the rim with fraud, forgery, deception, misrepresentation, sophistry, specious reasoning, illogical reasoning, self-deception, misreading, inadvertently fudged data, willful misunderstanding, ignorance, innocent mistakes, misinterpretations, equipment errors, out-of-date references, overlooked results or causes.... Unfortunately, ALL of these items MUST be examined FIRST when investigating any pseudoscientific topic, BEFORE one begins looking for presumed new or unusual natural phenomena.

Can you (anyone) honestly say he examined and eliminated all the above items before he convinced himself that some UFOs are extraterrestrial star ships?

I seriously doubt that.

UFOLOGY is entertainment and big buisness.