IMDb RATING
5.7/10
1.5K
YOUR RATING
A research submarine beneath the Arctic stumbles upon a terrifying secret with earth-shattering consequences.A research submarine beneath the Arctic stumbles upon a terrifying secret with earth-shattering consequences.A research submarine beneath the Arctic stumbles upon a terrifying secret with earth-shattering consequences.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Mediocre - average: lacking exceptional quality.
The once great BBC has fallen foul yet again to that great modern British attribute; mediocrity. While usually I would applaud the BBC for it's policy on social cohesion the actors inclusion is just well......formulaic. The way in which the BBC put together this drama is almost as though it was drama-by-numbers.
All the building blocks are there:
Ethnic minorities represented (including the new kid on the British block the eastern European) check.
Evil state puppet to attract liberals: check
SF concept to attract males under 45: check
Unnecessary romance to draw in female viewers: check.
Complicated yet vague plot: check.
Sum of all it's parts....FAIL.
The dialogue was ABYSS-mal, the characters seemed to ALIENate the audience rather than draw them and I do understand why viewers might seem DEEPly LOSTed when watching it.
The once great BBC has fallen foul yet again to that great modern British attribute; mediocrity. While usually I would applaud the BBC for it's policy on social cohesion the actors inclusion is just well......formulaic. The way in which the BBC put together this drama is almost as though it was drama-by-numbers.
All the building blocks are there:
Ethnic minorities represented (including the new kid on the British block the eastern European) check.
Evil state puppet to attract liberals: check
SF concept to attract males under 45: check
Unnecessary romance to draw in female viewers: check.
Complicated yet vague plot: check.
Sum of all it's parts....FAIL.
The dialogue was ABYSS-mal, the characters seemed to ALIENate the audience rather than draw them and I do understand why viewers might seem DEEPly LOSTed when watching it.
If you are mature enough to look past some basic cgi scenes the heart of this takes me back to great movies like the abyss. The plot moves fast and each episode is totally not predictable and if it can keep me awake where some series like Bones put me strait to sleep, it has some merit. So no flashing cool Cgi, great sets, good cast, good plot, fast paced. I enjoyed it.Reminds me a bit of the older style british cimena which you can view as dated or classic, but well worth a watch.
this series is inspired by the film of the same title, but starts out as flawed as the original film ends.
what else can i say. this series uses poor c.g. to amuse a somatose audience, and uses filler dialog in the same way.
whoever put this series together deserves a good old fashioned trip to the wood shed.
it has few plot points, obviously filled between with incongruous character reactions and stupid dialog which prompt time-filling conflicts, which stretches this tripe from a ninety minute show, into a British series length.
i was insulted by the watching, but unfortunately i kept viewing to see if it would get better or worse. the good news is it didn't get any worse. it played mediocre all the way through.
what else can i say. this series uses poor c.g. to amuse a somatose audience, and uses filler dialog in the same way.
whoever put this series together deserves a good old fashioned trip to the wood shed.
it has few plot points, obviously filled between with incongruous character reactions and stupid dialog which prompt time-filling conflicts, which stretches this tripe from a ninety minute show, into a British series length.
i was insulted by the watching, but unfortunately i kept viewing to see if it would get better or worse. the good news is it didn't get any worse. it played mediocre all the way through.
I saw this being advertised on the BBC and it looked quite interesting so I watched the first part. And I was hooked! OK the bad acting was a little off putting, but the show had created a mystery about a Submarine that goes missing in the Arctic ocean and something gigantic had caused it's disappearance.
I told all my friends about it, and said to catch the repeat in the week and I got on-board a few people that was hooked to.
And then part two happened! The mystery has been solved you learn about the something gigantic and the bad acting is still there and this is only part 2 out of 5.
By the end of part 3 you are now bored and know how the story is going to pan out.
You find yourself uninterested and really don't care what happens to anyone, and actually hope that they all somehow meet a horrible icy death by the end of part 5.
I really wish I had not invested 5 hours of my life in this predictable, badly written, poorly acted rubbish.
And I have to say a big SORRY to my friends that I dragged into this boring show. Can you forgive me?
I told all my friends about it, and said to catch the repeat in the week and I got on-board a few people that was hooked to.
And then part two happened! The mystery has been solved you learn about the something gigantic and the bad acting is still there and this is only part 2 out of 5.
By the end of part 3 you are now bored and know how the story is going to pan out.
You find yourself uninterested and really don't care what happens to anyone, and actually hope that they all somehow meet a horrible icy death by the end of part 5.
I really wish I had not invested 5 hours of my life in this predictable, badly written, poorly acted rubbish.
And I have to say a big SORRY to my friends that I dragged into this boring show. Can you forgive me?
Unless they are known to actually exist there, putting volcanic vents under the ice caps seems like poor writing to me. Wouldn't they melt the ice?
Drilling deep through an 800 degree 'volcanic field' is more likely to produce hot magma, than oil. Drilling underwater, serviced by subs, seems problematic. Not 'cheep' energy at all. And could not be kept secret for long.
Unless they are known to actually exist there, putting volcanic vents under the ice caps seems like poor writing to me. Wouldn't they melt the ice?
Drilling deep through an 800 degree 'volcanic field' is more likely to produce hot magma, than oil. Drilling underwater, serviced by subs, seems problematic. Not 'cheep' energy at all. And could not be kept secret for long.
Drilling deep through an 800 degree 'volcanic field' is more likely to produce hot magma, than oil. Drilling underwater, serviced by subs, seems problematic. Not 'cheep' energy at all. And could not be kept secret for long.
Unless they are known to actually exist there, putting volcanic vents under the ice caps seems like poor writing to me. Wouldn't they melt the ice?
Drilling deep through an 800 degree 'volcanic field' is more likely to produce hot magma, than oil. Drilling underwater, serviced by subs, seems problematic. Not 'cheep' energy at all. And could not be kept secret for long.
Did you know
- TriviaIn real life, Ron Donachie, who plays Sturridge, is the brother-in-law of series costume designer, 'Trish Biggar'.
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Wright Stuff: Episode #14.5 (2010)
- How many seasons does The Deep have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- The Deep: voyage au fond des mers
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Deep: aux frontières des abysses (2010) officially released in India in English?
Answer