IMDb RATING
7.0/10
1.7K
YOUR RATING
Gordon Ramsay, Nyesha Arrington, and Richard Blais compete together on what is the next evolution in cooking competitions.Gordon Ramsay, Nyesha Arrington, and Richard Blais compete together on what is the next evolution in cooking competitions.Gordon Ramsay, Nyesha Arrington, and Richard Blais compete together on what is the next evolution in cooking competitions.
- Awards
- 2 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
I love Gordon Ramsey, from his Hell's Kitchen, Nightmare Kitchens and Mastershef where he took a back seat a little.
But this show is a fail. I thought about why and here is what I believe:
First, we the viewers have no interest in the contestants back stories, we want them to emerge as individuals during the cooking tests. The way we get attached to people as we seem them perform under pressure in Hell's Kitchen for example. Here we are given a presentation on each one with the obligatory struggles story from the get go. It's a torture to watch. We are not interest in them yet. Send home half over a half season and then tell me a story about those that remain as I, as a viewer, have now formed an attachment or distaste for those that remain.
This leads to the other problem. The people are not authentic. They are not chefs that have struggled and have come in front of the judges and cooked something that impressed them and got them chosen. No one is chosen, no competition where they sweat and we wonder if the judges will take them for the show. We have no idea why they are chosen, apparently being a 'social media cook' is a ticket...what a joke. It like a sixty year old Ramsey is traying to be hip with the times. In Mastercook it worked because people had to compete for a spot and had to cook for it and sweat for it.in front of all 3 judges. This is how it also works in The Voice, contestants come and sing and hope a judge picks them and we the public get involved int he process. Here we are told they are selected, deal with it, and listen now to their back story with over the top dramatic music that is detached from our emotions. Big mistake, you are missing the fundamentals of drama.
That's the other problem as I see it, The drama in this show is about each chef having a team and that team trying to win for their chef. But I don't care which team is the best... I don't even know those people let alone cheer for a team. The music tries to force a drama, the judges keep saying they want to win, "we have to win guys", why? One judge says, 'they are all like my babies' this in the second episode, give me a break, they are not her babies, she had barely time to get to know them and saw them cook one time. Stop with this childish drama and put those cooks under pressure and tell them they are not good enough.. You have no connection to those people, we the audience have no connection so all the drama that we are supposed to feel about which team wins does not exist.
Another major problem is that there is no connection between the plate being judged and the person. He does not step forward, is not under pressure. Just judges tasting and the cooks standing in a group no one knows who made the dish. The judges comments are: 'whom ever made this dish did a grate job...'. No pressure. We know because the camera is on the cook's face, but so what. Let them step forward, look in their eyes as a judge. Let them know that what they have cooked could embarrass them in front of America or make them shine. Taste and be brutally honest. That's what we want to see.
That leads me to the judging. All dishes are good. Maybe something is overcooked or under. Not enough salt... But all is so positive. The first guy to leave the kitchen is told" 'young man, I don't think we have seen the last of you" - give me a break. He is the first to go. He is the worst. What is this disingenuous comment. Tell him why he is not good enough. Or better yet, challenge him to come back when he improves an prove you wrong. Let him be crushed, this is not a feel good show, its about sweat, hard work, perseverance and handling pressure.
. Finally the platform is interesting. The chain that sometimes is visible needs to be edited out as it gives a car garage feeling.
Also the kitchens where they cook are chosen is done at random. Big mistake. Start all in the best kitchen. Eliminated means you drop down a kitchen. Second elimination and you are in the basement and your hanging by a tread as there is nothing below the basement but a ticket home.. But that is ok, because even in the basement you can come back if you have the skills. Maybe you were unlucky but you still get a chance to prove us wrong. SHow us your grit and personality. Let us the audience root for the guy or gall in the basement, that she makes a dish which swaps her with some one from one level above. Now that's good drama, I should be payed for ideas like this. Ramsey, don't write the show, hire a writer to come up with the ideas. You are a great chef, that does not translate to writing. If you already hired a writer and he produced the first season, fire him and get a Jewish writer for gods sake. (thats a joke, get a good writer) Also get rid of the chefs teams. This isent the Voice. Have the judges be merciless. No mentor ship, this isent mama's kitchen, just brutal honesty in their face - that contestant is native american? Why do I care?. Let me see if she is 100% focused, if she cries, because this is her passion, this is her life and this opportunity is something that comes once in her life time. Her being native american is secondary. The other contestant has Jamaican roots - I DONT CARE! Thats not important. Get me people from the street, people hungry to prove them selves. Real people, not social influencers idiots.
If anyone read this far , you deserve a cookie honestly. I love you, YOU the reader. Hope I made you smile along the way.
But this show is a fail. I thought about why and here is what I believe:
First, we the viewers have no interest in the contestants back stories, we want them to emerge as individuals during the cooking tests. The way we get attached to people as we seem them perform under pressure in Hell's Kitchen for example. Here we are given a presentation on each one with the obligatory struggles story from the get go. It's a torture to watch. We are not interest in them yet. Send home half over a half season and then tell me a story about those that remain as I, as a viewer, have now formed an attachment or distaste for those that remain.
This leads to the other problem. The people are not authentic. They are not chefs that have struggled and have come in front of the judges and cooked something that impressed them and got them chosen. No one is chosen, no competition where they sweat and we wonder if the judges will take them for the show. We have no idea why they are chosen, apparently being a 'social media cook' is a ticket...what a joke. It like a sixty year old Ramsey is traying to be hip with the times. In Mastercook it worked because people had to compete for a spot and had to cook for it and sweat for it.in front of all 3 judges. This is how it also works in The Voice, contestants come and sing and hope a judge picks them and we the public get involved int he process. Here we are told they are selected, deal with it, and listen now to their back story with over the top dramatic music that is detached from our emotions. Big mistake, you are missing the fundamentals of drama.
That's the other problem as I see it, The drama in this show is about each chef having a team and that team trying to win for their chef. But I don't care which team is the best... I don't even know those people let alone cheer for a team. The music tries to force a drama, the judges keep saying they want to win, "we have to win guys", why? One judge says, 'they are all like my babies' this in the second episode, give me a break, they are not her babies, she had barely time to get to know them and saw them cook one time. Stop with this childish drama and put those cooks under pressure and tell them they are not good enough.. You have no connection to those people, we the audience have no connection so all the drama that we are supposed to feel about which team wins does not exist.
Another major problem is that there is no connection between the plate being judged and the person. He does not step forward, is not under pressure. Just judges tasting and the cooks standing in a group no one knows who made the dish. The judges comments are: 'whom ever made this dish did a grate job...'. No pressure. We know because the camera is on the cook's face, but so what. Let them step forward, look in their eyes as a judge. Let them know that what they have cooked could embarrass them in front of America or make them shine. Taste and be brutally honest. That's what we want to see.
That leads me to the judging. All dishes are good. Maybe something is overcooked or under. Not enough salt... But all is so positive. The first guy to leave the kitchen is told" 'young man, I don't think we have seen the last of you" - give me a break. He is the first to go. He is the worst. What is this disingenuous comment. Tell him why he is not good enough. Or better yet, challenge him to come back when he improves an prove you wrong. Let him be crushed, this is not a feel good show, its about sweat, hard work, perseverance and handling pressure.
. Finally the platform is interesting. The chain that sometimes is visible needs to be edited out as it gives a car garage feeling.
Also the kitchens where they cook are chosen is done at random. Big mistake. Start all in the best kitchen. Eliminated means you drop down a kitchen. Second elimination and you are in the basement and your hanging by a tread as there is nothing below the basement but a ticket home.. But that is ok, because even in the basement you can come back if you have the skills. Maybe you were unlucky but you still get a chance to prove us wrong. SHow us your grit and personality. Let us the audience root for the guy or gall in the basement, that she makes a dish which swaps her with some one from one level above. Now that's good drama, I should be payed for ideas like this. Ramsey, don't write the show, hire a writer to come up with the ideas. You are a great chef, that does not translate to writing. If you already hired a writer and he produced the first season, fire him and get a Jewish writer for gods sake. (thats a joke, get a good writer) Also get rid of the chefs teams. This isent the Voice. Have the judges be merciless. No mentor ship, this isent mama's kitchen, just brutal honesty in their face - that contestant is native american? Why do I care?. Let me see if she is 100% focused, if she cries, because this is her passion, this is her life and this opportunity is something that comes once in her life time. Her being native american is secondary. The other contestant has Jamaican roots - I DONT CARE! Thats not important. Get me people from the street, people hungry to prove them selves. Real people, not social influencers idiots.
If anyone read this far , you deserve a cookie honestly. I love you, YOU the reader. Hope I made you smile along the way.
Love the creation of the platform and three tiers of kitchens. Adds RNG aspects to a reality tv show.
Pros
Cons
Pros
- hype for fans of The Platform
- pokemon-like atmosphere where the judges build their own 5 person team
- 1 on 1 dual for those who make the least appetizing dish, team immunity for for the winning dish
Cons
- 30 seconds to pick ingredients as the platform drops seems quite limiting
- bias for team captains in determining winning dish + bias during final decisions for 1:1 given not a blind taste test.
I'll cut to the chase. I'm reviewing this halfway through Season 2. Read through a bunch of the 1-5 star reviews on IMDB and consider my review an emphatic Ditto! It seems that the producers failed to take into account the public perception of Season 1, to wit, the opinions here, and just carried on with the same bland, un-interesting, hyped-up, utterly lacking in drama or , heaven forbid, cooking prowess. These are average cooks with maybe 1 or 2 exceptions,cooking average food and the great chef hosts are jumping up and down trying to put lipstick on a pig to try to keep what is a giant yawn interesting. It is vapid, vacuous, and virtually pointless. Save yourself a little time and go watch a re-run of IronChef, the original, in Japanese, and watch that. You may not understand a thing they say but you will be infinitely more entertained if it is a cooking competition you're after. The bottom line, this show is Ramsay trying to make something out of nothing and failing abysmally.
The only reason this tv show exists is because Gordon Ramsay watched the horror/thriller movie The Platform and liked it. It's where he got the concept from. It's the SAME EXACT THING!!!
I really enjoyed the show and it was fun to watch!
I really enjoyed the show and it was fun to watch!
AWESOME concept, Gordon & Richard are great! There is no reason to be so harsh or haughty by the other judge/mentor. Temper the drama.
The experience & knowledge can support these contestants, yet growing the teams with supportive criticism needs to happen without demeaning rhetoric.
The experience & knowledge can support these contestants, yet growing the teams with supportive criticism needs to happen without demeaning rhetoric.
Did you know
- TriviaGordon Ramsay spent $4,000,000 on a gargantuan tri-level set with three kitchens stacked on top of one another.
- ConnectionsFeatured in This Morning: Episode #35.6 (2023)
- How many seasons does Next Level Chef have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime43 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content