Notre planète a ses limites: L'alerte de la science
Original title: Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet
IMDb RATING
7.7/10
3.4K
YOUR RATING
David Attenborough and scientist Johan Rockström examine Earth's biodiversity collapse and how this crisis can still be averted.David Attenborough and scientist Johan Rockström examine Earth's biodiversity collapse and how this crisis can still be averted.David Attenborough and scientist Johan Rockström examine Earth's biodiversity collapse and how this crisis can still be averted.
Photos
Elena Bennett
- Self - McGill University, Montréal
- (as Prof. Elena Bennett)
Jason Box
- Self - Geological Survey of Denmark & Greenland
- (as Prof. Jason Box)
Terry Hughes
- Self - Arc Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
- (as Prof. Terry Hughes)
Anne Larigauderie
- Self - Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- (as Prof. Anne Larigauderie)
María Neira
- Self - World Health Organisation
- (as Dr. María Neira)
Carlos Nobre
- Self - Institute of Advanced Studies University of Säo Paulo
- (as Prof. Carlos Nobre)
Daniella Teixeira
- Self - Environmentalist at University of Queensland
- (as Dr. Daniella Teixeira)
Greta Thunberg
- Self - Environment Activist
- (archive footage)
Ricarda Winkelmann
- Self - Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
- (as Prof. Ricarda Winkelmann)
Featured reviews
Johan says that the actions of humans alone in the past 50 years are responsible for pushing humanity and the planet out of the 10,000-year Holocene and into the Anthropocene. So it seems astounding to me that the global human population was not included as a critical boundary to the destabilization of the planet.
The global human population was just 3 billion in 1960 and it now sits at 7.9 billion, a 160 % increase in less than a lifetime. Just as any farmland has a maximum capacity for the number of livestock, the planet must also have a maximum capacity for the number of humans that demands all of its resources.
Countries like Brazil have seen their populations tripled since 1960; there were 70 million Brazilians then and there are 210 million now. As draconian and inhumane as China's one-child policy was, their population would be 2 billion without it, instead of 1.5 billion, if they had the same population growth as Brazil. Human culture has to change because there is no evolutionary need for any family to have more than two children since most children will survive into adulthood.
The global human population was just 3 billion in 1960 and it now sits at 7.9 billion, a 160 % increase in less than a lifetime. Just as any farmland has a maximum capacity for the number of livestock, the planet must also have a maximum capacity for the number of humans that demands all of its resources.
Countries like Brazil have seen their populations tripled since 1960; there were 70 million Brazilians then and there are 210 million now. As draconian and inhumane as China's one-child policy was, their population would be 2 billion without it, instead of 1.5 billion, if they had the same population growth as Brazil. Human culture has to change because there is no evolutionary need for any family to have more than two children since most children will survive into adulthood.
It is definitely worth of your 1 hour 13 minutes time to watch this science-based documentary about how humanity has the dominant role, as Sir David Attenborough perfectly highlighted on his closing narrative, as the only Earth's conscience and brain, whether to lead the world and its ecosystems to the danger zones by continuously doing our business as usual, or to secure the future with a healthy and fresh air, clean water, stable climate, nutritious land, and resilient planet, by doing everything we can to not break the planetary boundaries.
Dear filmmakers everywhere: it is a good thing you attempt to do by explaining the sorry state of the planet but you all miss the key problem and solution. People are not going to change their behavior or expectations. They aren't going to give up their electronics or other creature comforts. So what is the problem really? It is people. There are too many of us on this planet now and it isn't sustainable. More people are coming so if we don't name the problem, how can we ever fix it? Overpopulation is the entire problem and reducing population is the only solution. Why is it so hard for people to see that?
It's easy to see how humans are responsible for the devastation done to the environment. Industrialists and the governing bodies of every country are 100% responsible for this. It's the end. I'll be gone, and you may be gone, but the future of humanity is without doubt going to be filled with strife, and probably extinction of 99.9% of life on the planet. No one cared, so no one will live. It's the apocalypse, and you are all here to witness.
A great flood is coming after fires that burn the planet. Wild stuff.
A great flood is coming after fires that burn the planet. Wild stuff.
Did you know
- ConnectionsReferences Mad Max (1979)
- How long is Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 13 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Notre planète a ses limites: L'alerte de la science (2021) officially released in Japan in Japanese?
Answer