IMDb RATING
3.8/10
1.2K
YOUR RATING
Lola James works to save enough money to get her little brother, Arlo, out of their toxic home. Arlo keeps her hopeful, until one tragic night, when her whole world gets uprooted. From that ... Read allLola James works to save enough money to get her little brother, Arlo, out of their toxic home. Arlo keeps her hopeful, until one tragic night, when her whole world gets uprooted. From that moment on, nothing will ever be the same.Lola James works to save enough money to get her little brother, Arlo, out of their toxic home. Arlo keeps her hopeful, until one tragic night, when her whole world gets uprooted. From that moment on, nothing will ever be the same.
- Director
- Writer
- Stars
Vincent Foster
- Bruce
- (as V.J. Foster)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I'm not even sure if this film deserves a bad review or if it's better to just pretend I didn't endure this incredibly bad movie. Lola feels like the director decided to film the beat sheet instead of the actual script. The pacing is rushed, as if the goal was to get through the story quickly just to linger on longer close-up shots of Nicola Peltz Beckham's face. My initial thought was, "Does the director have a crush on Nicola?" Then I realized-she is the director, and also the writer. Suddenly, it all made sense. This film is nothing more than a vanity project, and it painfully shows.
I do have to compliment the Director of Photography.
I do have to compliment the Director of Photography.
Lets go to the good part about this movie.
-good cinematography -Raven Goodwin
now the bad one.
-Can someone tell now, what the f does the richest daughter in the entire country, knows about everything she talked about?
-Im only seeing a rich girl make an aesthetic of this life style.
-Her acting is awful, no soul, she doesn't dig more when she acts, always at the same level of boringness.
-The characters are flat, and its probably just because of the acting.
-Feels like a trauma dumping story from the author and the author probably doesn't know what it feels like to not have food on you're plate
If i could put a zero star, i would.
No one needed to see this movie.
-good cinematography -Raven Goodwin
now the bad one.
-Can someone tell now, what the f does the richest daughter in the entire country, knows about everything she talked about?
-Im only seeing a rich girl make an aesthetic of this life style.
-Her acting is awful, no soul, she doesn't dig more when she acts, always at the same level of boringness.
-The characters are flat, and its probably just because of the acting.
-Feels like a trauma dumping story from the author and the author probably doesn't know what it feels like to not have food on you're plate
If i could put a zero star, i would.
No one needed to see this movie.
Okay. I want to give my brutally honest opinion in depth. Because i have noticed no-one else really has on here yet. And i think it is necessary.
The cinematography, budget for talent, color scheme, costume/wardrobe(MINUS THE BELLY SHIRTS WHILE PREGNANT), set design, and drive for producing something that was supposed to give you a emotional reaction was 100% all there.
The writing and storylines are what failed this.
The fact that Nicola Peltz was born a billionaire and has not lived any of these moments or probably ever been within a 10 mile radius of any sort of actual struggle like these characters, is what makes this movie absolutely crumble. This was Nicola's play project to get to live a pretend life of trauma and poverty. (My assumption is being born so immensely wealthy resulted in her wanting to put on this fetish-ization of trauma p*rn).
But, i do think Nicola's performance and acting was honestly good. I will give her that. I would even argue that her performance was stronger than Virginia Madsens(who played the mom), who for such a seasoned actress was the weakest actor in this to be honest. The portrayal of the mother literally was a college improv class performance of "act like a 8 years sober from alcohol divorced middle age conservative mother who clutches their bible and is mentally abusive".
Starting off with the good: The LGBT youth storyline with Lola's younger sibling was the strongest written storyline and most interesting in this. And i think had the most memorable and best scenes in the film overall. I think the actor who played the younger sibling did a good job of balancing portraying innocence while still dealing with self conflict. At the end of each of Lola and her siblings scenes it would make me root for them to accomplish getting away from the mother and succeeding.
The scenes with Babina(Lola's friend and coworker) were also enjoyable to watch. I think the mellow friendship chemistry was portrayed well. I think it was realistic and sweet.
Now the bad: Lola's relationship with Malachi (her dr*g dealer and then BF) was super awkward and not realistic. It was such a push and pull of him being a F boy dirt bag and then magically cleaning up his act and caring that was so beyond unrealistic. Let's be real, when she was spiraling and was asking him for product he would of just looked at her as easy money customer.
The relationship with her mother/ all the interactions with her mother- like i stated above. Was just WAY too stereotypical to what a lower class middle age angry conservatives mother would be expected to react to having a stripper daughter and a LGBT son. It was a eye-rolling performance we've seen a million times on top of being poorly performed.
Lola wearing belly shirts and platform flip flops while 8 months pregnant????? Also having dr*g benders and still having perfect smokey eyeshadow cut creases + perfect skin??? Although i'll give them props for Lola having the that horrible greasy pee yellow box dye hair color, that was actually realistic.
Lola's job as a dancer. YIKES -where do i get started?
At the start of the movie it's almost alluded to Lola working at the club for a while to some extent. She certainly walks around the club as if she is comfortable and knows the process. Then about a half hour into the movie there is a scene in the back of the club where Lola talks to one of the other dancers and she expresses that she needs more money. This is when her fellow dancer coworker tells her about "the back room" and that she can make more money catering to clients in "the back room" - in a completely naive fashion that is so unbelievable it's laughable.
We are supposed to believe that Lola, a girl in her 20's who was raised in a lower middle class area -is a virgin who dresses skimpy and works at a strip club - has no idea about the s*x work that goes on often in strip clubs? Lola's character acts dumbfounded and as if she has never heard of such a thing going on before in the club. It's a horrendously out of touch and written scene.
Final thoughts: Okay after reading this all out, it was not my intention to drag this movie to shreds. I think most of what i am pointing out is what a-lot of other people are thinking too after watching this.
My main takeaway is when Nicola makes another project that she clearly has the budget + access to resources that can potentially make a good movie - is PLEASE get a writers team who will be brutally honest with you to help out with a more polished and realistic script.
Anyway, kudos if you read this far.
Also Nicola is you are reading this, hmu to help you write something- i can use some extra money.
Thank you. 💟
The cinematography, budget for talent, color scheme, costume/wardrobe(MINUS THE BELLY SHIRTS WHILE PREGNANT), set design, and drive for producing something that was supposed to give you a emotional reaction was 100% all there.
The writing and storylines are what failed this.
The fact that Nicola Peltz was born a billionaire and has not lived any of these moments or probably ever been within a 10 mile radius of any sort of actual struggle like these characters, is what makes this movie absolutely crumble. This was Nicola's play project to get to live a pretend life of trauma and poverty. (My assumption is being born so immensely wealthy resulted in her wanting to put on this fetish-ization of trauma p*rn).
But, i do think Nicola's performance and acting was honestly good. I will give her that. I would even argue that her performance was stronger than Virginia Madsens(who played the mom), who for such a seasoned actress was the weakest actor in this to be honest. The portrayal of the mother literally was a college improv class performance of "act like a 8 years sober from alcohol divorced middle age conservative mother who clutches their bible and is mentally abusive".
Starting off with the good: The LGBT youth storyline with Lola's younger sibling was the strongest written storyline and most interesting in this. And i think had the most memorable and best scenes in the film overall. I think the actor who played the younger sibling did a good job of balancing portraying innocence while still dealing with self conflict. At the end of each of Lola and her siblings scenes it would make me root for them to accomplish getting away from the mother and succeeding.
The scenes with Babina(Lola's friend and coworker) were also enjoyable to watch. I think the mellow friendship chemistry was portrayed well. I think it was realistic and sweet.
Now the bad: Lola's relationship with Malachi (her dr*g dealer and then BF) was super awkward and not realistic. It was such a push and pull of him being a F boy dirt bag and then magically cleaning up his act and caring that was so beyond unrealistic. Let's be real, when she was spiraling and was asking him for product he would of just looked at her as easy money customer.
The relationship with her mother/ all the interactions with her mother- like i stated above. Was just WAY too stereotypical to what a lower class middle age angry conservatives mother would be expected to react to having a stripper daughter and a LGBT son. It was a eye-rolling performance we've seen a million times on top of being poorly performed.
Lola wearing belly shirts and platform flip flops while 8 months pregnant????? Also having dr*g benders and still having perfect smokey eyeshadow cut creases + perfect skin??? Although i'll give them props for Lola having the that horrible greasy pee yellow box dye hair color, that was actually realistic.
Lola's job as a dancer. YIKES -where do i get started?
At the start of the movie it's almost alluded to Lola working at the club for a while to some extent. She certainly walks around the club as if she is comfortable and knows the process. Then about a half hour into the movie there is a scene in the back of the club where Lola talks to one of the other dancers and she expresses that she needs more money. This is when her fellow dancer coworker tells her about "the back room" and that she can make more money catering to clients in "the back room" - in a completely naive fashion that is so unbelievable it's laughable.
We are supposed to believe that Lola, a girl in her 20's who was raised in a lower middle class area -is a virgin who dresses skimpy and works at a strip club - has no idea about the s*x work that goes on often in strip clubs? Lola's character acts dumbfounded and as if she has never heard of such a thing going on before in the club. It's a horrendously out of touch and written scene.
Final thoughts: Okay after reading this all out, it was not my intention to drag this movie to shreds. I think most of what i am pointing out is what a-lot of other people are thinking too after watching this.
My main takeaway is when Nicola makes another project that she clearly has the budget + access to resources that can potentially make a good movie - is PLEASE get a writers team who will be brutally honest with you to help out with a more polished and realistic script.
Anyway, kudos if you read this far.
Also Nicola is you are reading this, hmu to help you write something- i can use some extra money.
Thank you. 💟
Shockingly awful movie, the kind that isn't just bad, but makes you really mad that you wasted 2 hours of your life watching it.
This film reeks of what a socially privileged person, high up in a penthouse only looking down on the world, imagines what the poor and vulnerable might feel like. To those of us at the bottom, this imaginary tale just comes across as a pigeon pooping on us.
Maybe they meant well, maybe not, this still comes across as a piece of trash. It's more poverty porn and exploitation, than a clever, heartfelt exploration of the issues covered.
The plot is full of traumatic life experiences, but it never builds up or evolves into anything. It's just a series of unhappy events. Every 10 minutes or so, a new traumatic experience happens, which fills in the next 10 minutes, until the next bad thing to happen. It's like as if the writers spent a day watching chat shows using the events in each show to create 10 minutes of storyline. Eventually, instead of building a relationship with the characters, you end up being saturated by trauma and sadly feeling disconnected and losing all empathy - that's not a good feeling.
The film work is self-indulgent and feels like an attempt to replicate some of the techniques that make cinematography an art form. Mostly, it feels very amateur, but in one or two places, it's not too bad. It tries far too hard, and it misses the mark, and in any case, even if it was outstandingly filmed (which it isn't), the cliche riddled storyline is far too bad to give it a 2 star rating.
Lastly, transcending the storyline and writing, the acting is terrible. Like, really, really bad.
I detecting a nomination of at least one Golden Raspberry for this...
This film reeks of what a socially privileged person, high up in a penthouse only looking down on the world, imagines what the poor and vulnerable might feel like. To those of us at the bottom, this imaginary tale just comes across as a pigeon pooping on us.
Maybe they meant well, maybe not, this still comes across as a piece of trash. It's more poverty porn and exploitation, than a clever, heartfelt exploration of the issues covered.
The plot is full of traumatic life experiences, but it never builds up or evolves into anything. It's just a series of unhappy events. Every 10 minutes or so, a new traumatic experience happens, which fills in the next 10 minutes, until the next bad thing to happen. It's like as if the writers spent a day watching chat shows using the events in each show to create 10 minutes of storyline. Eventually, instead of building a relationship with the characters, you end up being saturated by trauma and sadly feeling disconnected and losing all empathy - that's not a good feeling.
The film work is self-indulgent and feels like an attempt to replicate some of the techniques that make cinematography an art form. Mostly, it feels very amateur, but in one or two places, it's not too bad. It tries far too hard, and it misses the mark, and in any case, even if it was outstandingly filmed (which it isn't), the cliche riddled storyline is far too bad to give it a 2 star rating.
Lastly, transcending the storyline and writing, the acting is terrible. Like, really, really bad.
I detecting a nomination of at least one Golden Raspberry for this...
As others have said, the 10/10 reviews are obviously from shills connected with the movie or friends of Mrs Peltz-Beckham. The simple fact that it was written by, directed by, and stars Nicola should make you suspect that this is purely a vanity project, much like her husband's attempts to portray himself as a photographer and/or chef. And you would be right as she spends most of the film looking dead behind the eyes and completely detached from the storyline. She should stick to doing what she does best, being a "poor little rich girl", as she sure as hell doesn't have a future in the film industry.
Did you know
- TriviaPeltz Beckham wrote the script over a three-day period when she was just 23 years old.
- SoundtracksOn My Own
produced by Chris Howard
- How long is Lola?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $648
- Runtime1 hour 24 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content