Tensions flare in the near future aboard the International Space Station as a conflict breaks out on Earth. Reeling, the U.S. and Russian astronauts receive orders from the ground: take cont... Read allTensions flare in the near future aboard the International Space Station as a conflict breaks out on Earth. Reeling, the U.S. and Russian astronauts receive orders from the ground: take control of the station by any means necessary.Tensions flare in the near future aboard the International Space Station as a conflict breaks out on Earth. Reeling, the U.S. and Russian astronauts receive orders from the ground: take control of the station by any means necessary.
- Awards
- 1 win & 1 nomination total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
It's a very interesting premise, not one I recall being done. Astronauts from different superpower countries are up in space while world war 3 essentially breaks out down on earth. Problem is it lacks tension and intensity. We didn't get time to get acquainted properly with each of the characters, as well as their connections between each other. Although the film invests initial moments in character development, it falls short in getting a genuine attachment to any of the six characters for me.
However, there's a couple minutes in the movie when the war down below starts, a brief moment when the trust between Russian and American scientists disappears after they both receive orders but don't know if their counterparts also got the exact same ones. While this brings a brief sense of tension, it dissipates quickly, leaving the overall impression of the movie feeling rather meh. Also wouldn't other countries also be on the ISS?
'Gravity' with Sandra bullock was a compelling movie that this one reminded me of. This tries to evoke a sense of claustrophobia, but I didn't feel it. I mean yeah there's the evident spatial constraints and the characters confined to a limited number of rooms, but the film struggles to convey this effectively on screen. Felt very slow, I was aching for it to move on and just get to the end. It's just not much of a memorable watch. The "so do I" line was satisfying though.
However, there's a couple minutes in the movie when the war down below starts, a brief moment when the trust between Russian and American scientists disappears after they both receive orders but don't know if their counterparts also got the exact same ones. While this brings a brief sense of tension, it dissipates quickly, leaving the overall impression of the movie feeling rather meh. Also wouldn't other countries also be on the ISS?
'Gravity' with Sandra bullock was a compelling movie that this one reminded me of. This tries to evoke a sense of claustrophobia, but I didn't feel it. I mean yeah there's the evident spatial constraints and the characters confined to a limited number of rooms, but the film struggles to convey this effectively on screen. Felt very slow, I was aching for it to move on and just get to the end. It's just not much of a memorable watch. The "so do I" line was satisfying though.
As someone who rarely writes reviews, I felt compelled to share my thoughts on this film. The experience left me questioning whether I was watching a student project rather than a professional, cinema-grade production.
Firstly, the casting was notably inconsistent, with only two of the three actors playing Russians actually being Russian. The third actor's rendition of the Russian language was so flawed it was nearly unintelligible. Should finding a Russian actor have been a challenge, the use of voiceovers in Russian scenes might have been a prudent alternative. Moreover, the supposed official communications to Russian astronauts were nonsensical, merely a string of random letters. It begs the question, why not strive for a semblance of authenticity?
Secondly, the film unfortunately indulged in stereotypical portrayals, particularly the overused trope of Russians invariably drinking vodka. This is akin to unfounded stereotypes of American astronauts being overweight and constantly eating burgers. It's pertinent to mention that the I. S. S. Strictly forbids alcohol and related products, including mouthwash and aftershave, due to the potential damage their chemical components, like ethanol, can cause to the equipment. A little research in the scriptwriting phase would have been advantageous.
Lastly, the graphics in several scenes were disappointingly reminiscent of the 80s, detracting from the overall quality of the film.
There were stupid moments all 90 minutes long.
As a school project, this work might get a 10/10 for its effort. However, as a commercially-released movie, it struggles to reach a 4/10 in my view.
Firstly, the casting was notably inconsistent, with only two of the three actors playing Russians actually being Russian. The third actor's rendition of the Russian language was so flawed it was nearly unintelligible. Should finding a Russian actor have been a challenge, the use of voiceovers in Russian scenes might have been a prudent alternative. Moreover, the supposed official communications to Russian astronauts were nonsensical, merely a string of random letters. It begs the question, why not strive for a semblance of authenticity?
Secondly, the film unfortunately indulged in stereotypical portrayals, particularly the overused trope of Russians invariably drinking vodka. This is akin to unfounded stereotypes of American astronauts being overweight and constantly eating burgers. It's pertinent to mention that the I. S. S. Strictly forbids alcohol and related products, including mouthwash and aftershave, due to the potential damage their chemical components, like ethanol, can cause to the equipment. A little research in the scriptwriting phase would have been advantageous.
Lastly, the graphics in several scenes were disappointingly reminiscent of the 80s, detracting from the overall quality of the film.
There were stupid moments all 90 minutes long.
As a school project, this work might get a 10/10 for its effort. However, as a commercially-released movie, it struggles to reach a 4/10 in my view.
The premise of the movie is great, but some poor decisions in the script ruined the movie for me. This could've been a very good, Hitchcockian suspense thriller. Instead, they give away too much too soon, and make every action too predictable. There is some suspense, but it does not pervade the entire film; it is only intermittent. The characters are not very complex at all, and the viewer isn't very vested in any of them by the time things turn sour. As for the ending, I'm not sure what they were going for there.
I was really expecting more from this movie, but left very disappointed. Not the worst I've seen this year, but it also could've been one of the best.
I was really expecting more from this movie, but left very disappointed. Not the worst I've seen this year, but it also could've been one of the best.
Great concept for a story. I found it to be original and exciting. The acting (outside of the zero G) was quite good and I was really drawn in by each of the performances. However, the zero G effects were so bad and it kept pulling me out of the story. It doesn't take an expert to realize just how lazy this production got with ensuring even a hint of accuracy. If this story took place in a near future where artificial gravity was established, I would have enjoyed it a lot more. Or I would have enjoyed this movie more as an audio book or audio drama so I could use my imagination of what it looked like. But the visuals were so distracting and disappointing. The story was good and an interesting and original concept that I would have enjoyed if I could have focused.
The premise is fairly strong, but would need a great script that takes the story into a direction that subverts expectations. I. S. S. Doesn't do this. In fact, it goes the route of turning characters stupid and having situations happen to fit the narrative rather than coming off at all realistic.
Nothing is worse than a movie that has plot holes that glaringly stick out while you're watching it. You foresee where the shaky plot will falter, then the film proceeds to flounder itself into becoming more and more stupid because the original plot points are too weak to be paid off in a smart way. It is written into a corner where there's too many instances of plot convenience, with many going off the deep end of all plausibility. Characters inexplicably become different persons on a flip of a dime. At one point a character "dies" off screen only to come back for no reason. A character does evil things early on only to become a good guy by the end. Another character can't speak Russian well at all only to become fluent later. Someone else chooses to make a distraction in an unbelievably dangerous way. If the conflict is between the U. S. and Russia, why is the Yucatan Peninsula being bombed? These, and many other dumb decisions, lead to an end that is perhaps the dumbest moment of all.
Ultimately, when a writer can't figure out a smart way to resolve a conflict, then you should rethink the conflict. I. S. S. Becomes more stupid as it goes because its conflicts are too weak to begin with and it digs itself into a never-ending hole by the end. There's not much positive to say about this, because any positivity that I had was only in the first 30 minutes of the movie. Do yourself a favor and skip this one.
Nothing is worse than a movie that has plot holes that glaringly stick out while you're watching it. You foresee where the shaky plot will falter, then the film proceeds to flounder itself into becoming more and more stupid because the original plot points are too weak to be paid off in a smart way. It is written into a corner where there's too many instances of plot convenience, with many going off the deep end of all plausibility. Characters inexplicably become different persons on a flip of a dime. At one point a character "dies" off screen only to come back for no reason. A character does evil things early on only to become a good guy by the end. Another character can't speak Russian well at all only to become fluent later. Someone else chooses to make a distraction in an unbelievably dangerous way. If the conflict is between the U. S. and Russia, why is the Yucatan Peninsula being bombed? These, and many other dumb decisions, lead to an end that is perhaps the dumbest moment of all.
Ultimately, when a writer can't figure out a smart way to resolve a conflict, then you should rethink the conflict. I. S. S. Becomes more stupid as it goes because its conflicts are too weak to begin with and it digs itself into a never-ending hole by the end. There's not much positive to say about this, because any positivity that I had was only in the first 30 minutes of the movie. Do yourself a favor and skip this one.
Did you know
- TriviaIn December 2020, Nick Shafir's screenplay I.S.S. was included on that year's "Black List" of most-liked unproduced screenplays.
- GoofsAround 41min, Gordon is outside the ISS and is at the end of his tether. The tether is hooked to one of the handlebars on the side of the outer wall. Gordon chooses to unhook himself rather that move the tether's anchor over to a second handlebar, closer to his position, which is clearly visible. There is no reason for him to unhook himself from the tether.
- SoundtracksWind of Change
Written by Klaus Meine
Performed by Scorpions
Published by BMG Platinum Songs US (BMI)
All Rights Administered by BMG Rights Management (US) LLC
Licensed by Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited
- How long is I.S.S.?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Languages
- Also known as
- Uluslararası Uzay İstasyonu
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $20,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $6,573,799
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $3,064,583
- Jan 21, 2024
- Gross worldwide
- $6,605,079
- Runtime1 hour 35 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content