Ghosts Don't Exist

I just watched the movie, and it was just boring. The acting was bad. There wasn't anything scary about the movie. I really really like movies that this is trying to be but it fails. The acting was some of the worse. It makes no sense. I had to rewind scenes and watch them again and still it made no sense.

The editing was VERY choppy. The movie seemed to just drag on and on. It took what could have been a really great concept and dropped the ball very early on.

By the end I was only enjoying the movie to make fun of, in between yelling at the movie about how stupid the characters were acting.

It's always good to watch a film that might interest you, whether it's the cover of the video or the theme that caught your attention. What is not good is to guess in your mind how good the actual film will be. This is where some Genres fall by the wayside in their descriptions of films. I really didn't think this was a horror film at all. I think too many people simply guess that when a film deals with death - or even "life" after it, then there should be some good bits of gore/horrible death along the way. It isn't always like that in films that make you want to think about it's actual context.

The film deals with both sides of the believer and skeptic coin, and the coin keeps spinning in your mind as you watch the story unfold. In a way it is suspense only in where you feel your own beliefs lie and if what you were watching made you consider those beliefs - or even lose interest altogether.

There are very few films that actually deal with this topic and the approach to bringing something that is now becoming more popular should be welcomed.

This film in my opinion and those that watched with me, unfortunately fails On most levels

Of Basic film making. Story, sound, editing, lighting all need to review the basics again before embarking on any more film projects. The film at best comes across as unbalanced, random and bumpy. We were lost as far as the story goes and the tension is dissolved due to a lack of long, unemotional cuts which dissolve any attempt to build up some sort of thrill or drama. I will at least give credit to the fact that the production seems to have been funded enough to make a film as big as this one based on the endless list if credits that run when it finally ends. I know this might come across as bitter but we did give it a chance and struggled through to the end in hopes of something remotely scary, but in the end it is 2 hours we will never get back.

I have seen some bad films and while this is no where near as bad as some I've seen it gets pretty close. Had it been a TV movie shown on one of those cheap cable movie channels I would have expected no more, but this bigs itself up to be a huge cinematic release and it would take a very successful cinema to show this, because it would have hundreds of empty seats once word got around. The acting is on par with some of the films SyFy pay to get made; the story is a muddle - I don't know if this is because of bad writing, bad editing or bad film making; but it was difficult to follow and parts of it made no sense. It's one of those films that leaves you thinking about specifics and realising that there is no rhyme or reason for it. The shame about it is that given to the right people it might have been a good film, but that would have required cutting away everything apart from the title and the idea that you can have a ghost hunter who is on his last case. I also found the blatant good reviewing by obvious stooges a very underhanded attempt at upping the film's rating. I'm disappointed that tactics like this are used, because they just come back and bite the reviewers' on the a$$. A poor show.

I like cheap B movies. I like indie films. I enjoy cheesy made for tv movies. The problem with this one was it did not bill itself as a B movie, it did not present itself like an indie film, and it did not embrace the moments of levity that could have upped the tension by contrast.

They.forgot to forget to include a plot.

The story runs like 5 different scriptwriters, with 5 different agendas, all wrote this at the same time.

No character development. No protagonist that the audience can actually buy into; it's one thing to tell a story utilizing an anti-hero as your protagonist, but this was a story utilizing a non-protagonist as the protagonist.

The thing where it gets revealed that each person on the investigative team each has their own unresolved traumas motivating them makes sense to me, but the story suggests they've been working together for years now, and it feels like they should already know this stuff about each other. Character history feels like something the scriptwriters forgot to develop and tossed on the page at the last minute.

The story lines get really tangled and disjointed the deeper into the story you get. And the resolution is cliche and repetitive, no consequences, no growth, no foreshadowing.

This is a special level of awful.