IMDb RATING
3.2/10
3.3K
YOUR RATING
The adventures of 3 young astronomers and their fight to survive a deadly Martian invasion.The adventures of 3 young astronomers and their fight to survive a deadly Martian invasion.The adventures of 3 young astronomers and their fight to survive a deadly Martian invasion.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Fredi Nwaka
- Sergeant
- (as Fredi 'Kruga' Nwaka)
Featured reviews
Well, imagine my surprising stumbling upon this 2023 movie titled "War of the Worlds: The Attack" and never having heard about it. And while I am not overly much of a sci-fi buff, of course I've seen the 1953 movie "The War of the Worlds" and also the 2005 remake with Tom Cruise. And the concept idea behind this H. G. Well story is interesting, and thus I opted to sit down and watch "War of the Worlds: The Attack" as well.
Writers Junaid Syed and Tom Jolliffe based their 2023 movie on the H. G. Wells story, of course, but they opted to do their own take on it. Was it good? No, not really. Why? Because, "War of the Worlds: The Attack" was not an entertaining movie, and it was essentially just a pointless and redudant remake that I suppose no one has been asking for or craving for.
Sure, I managed to sit through all 85 minutes of the ordeal, only to see if there was anything worthwhile watching in the narrative. There wasn't, I can tell you that. While there are elements of the original story in "War of the Worlds: The Attack", then this was mostly a drama following three teenagers during the brief time of the invasion of the Martians.
Visually then I will say that the special effects were adequate. I mean, I weren't impressed, nor were I laughing either. It wasn't top pier special effects and CGI, I will say that, but the effects functioned well enough as intended.
I doubt even the fans of the H. G. Wells story will find much to cheer about in director Junaid Syed's 2023 attempt to reinvent the classic sci-fi tale.
My rating of "War of the Worlds: The Attack" lands on a very generous three out of ten stars.
Writers Junaid Syed and Tom Jolliffe based their 2023 movie on the H. G. Wells story, of course, but they opted to do their own take on it. Was it good? No, not really. Why? Because, "War of the Worlds: The Attack" was not an entertaining movie, and it was essentially just a pointless and redudant remake that I suppose no one has been asking for or craving for.
Sure, I managed to sit through all 85 minutes of the ordeal, only to see if there was anything worthwhile watching in the narrative. There wasn't, I can tell you that. While there are elements of the original story in "War of the Worlds: The Attack", then this was mostly a drama following three teenagers during the brief time of the invasion of the Martians.
Visually then I will say that the special effects were adequate. I mean, I weren't impressed, nor were I laughing either. It wasn't top pier special effects and CGI, I will say that, but the effects functioned well enough as intended.
I doubt even the fans of the H. G. Wells story will find much to cheer about in director Junaid Syed's 2023 attempt to reinvent the classic sci-fi tale.
My rating of "War of the Worlds: The Attack" lands on a very generous three out of ten stars.
Of all the incarnations of War Of The Worlds...this one is by far the worst.
The way the go from the Martian invaders wantonly killing everyone...to chilling in their house...or going on leisurely bicycle rides, generally unscathed...is patently ridiculous.
We find ourselves following three random kids, who-for some reason- are important enough to care about.
Even if that reason is not particularly clear.
Less it be that they are "the chosen ones", who need to be "saved" by an especially hypocritical, hardline, religious zealot (so he can repopulate the Earth with their female friend), or whatever.
The whole thing is about 90% childish drama, and 10% action...when it clearly needs to be the other way around.
Despite the fact that all the action is rendered with CGI (albeit, better than you might expect from a production of this caliber- think, akin to Monsters, or Nope, to get an idea).
The plot structure is absolutely horrible.
Because you get all this inane drama...followed by a ridiculous twist, that comes out of nowhere.
Used to abruptly wrap up story...without any explanation...or any attempt to connect it to the rest of the storyline.
Which doesn't make much sense.
Especially considering the aliens seem more mechanical than biological in nature.
Plus...for a film about the end of the world...there's never really any sense of urgency employed by any of the actors.
Who are really quite nonchalant about the whole ordeal.
So stuff happens.
Then it's suddenly over.
Without going into detail about any of the connecting factors...
It's just bad storytelling, overall.
And kind of stupid, to be honest.
So do yourself a favour, and just pass on this stinker.
Because it's simply not worth the time.
Unless you are looking to waste it.
2 out of 10.
The way the go from the Martian invaders wantonly killing everyone...to chilling in their house...or going on leisurely bicycle rides, generally unscathed...is patently ridiculous.
We find ourselves following three random kids, who-for some reason- are important enough to care about.
Even if that reason is not particularly clear.
Less it be that they are "the chosen ones", who need to be "saved" by an especially hypocritical, hardline, religious zealot (so he can repopulate the Earth with their female friend), or whatever.
The whole thing is about 90% childish drama, and 10% action...when it clearly needs to be the other way around.
Despite the fact that all the action is rendered with CGI (albeit, better than you might expect from a production of this caliber- think, akin to Monsters, or Nope, to get an idea).
The plot structure is absolutely horrible.
Because you get all this inane drama...followed by a ridiculous twist, that comes out of nowhere.
Used to abruptly wrap up story...without any explanation...or any attempt to connect it to the rest of the storyline.
Which doesn't make much sense.
Especially considering the aliens seem more mechanical than biological in nature.
Plus...for a film about the end of the world...there's never really any sense of urgency employed by any of the actors.
Who are really quite nonchalant about the whole ordeal.
So stuff happens.
Then it's suddenly over.
Without going into detail about any of the connecting factors...
It's just bad storytelling, overall.
And kind of stupid, to be honest.
So do yourself a favour, and just pass on this stinker.
Because it's simply not worth the time.
Unless you are looking to waste it.
2 out of 10.
Don't judge the movie based on watching the trailer. It was cleverly put together and I was fooled enough into thinking it would be an exciting new take on a classic sci-fi story. The actual movie is amateurish, slow with bad acting, writing and effects. It feels more like a network TV movie and not worth the rental price.
I wish I could say more about it, but I was bored out of my mind. I couldn't make it through all the way in my first watching. I came back to it later to see if it got better, but it just didn't. It's pure garbage and I would like my 6.99 rental back. I recommend you save your money.
I wish I could say more about it, but I was bored out of my mind. I couldn't make it through all the way in my first watching. I came back to it later to see if it got better, but it just didn't. It's pure garbage and I would like my 6.99 rental back. I recommend you save your money.
This is the worst adaptation of war of the world. The acting was atrocious. Wooden and so cringe. The actors literally reading the script like a rehearsal. Non of the characters were believable , from the police officer to the army guy. Very amateurish. I couldn't stand the accents. The 3 kids were suppose to be university students but were so immature they acted as if they were in primary school. Nobody was remotely likeable. My brain couldn't take anymore after 15 minutes. This was the most boring film I have watched in awhile. Whatever possessed the directors to make the film is beyond me. I do not recommend if you want to keep your sanity.
We saw this on Amazon prime and I assume the trailer enticed my wife to purchase this. Terrible acting, terrible storyline, terrible dialogue and terrible fx. The acting is genuinely wooden and it is laughably bad at points. The explosions and fx look worse than 80s films; Whoever funded this should have accepted that £20 would not be a sufficient special effects budget for a sci-fi movie and saved all involved from this embarrassment. The worst thing is that it cost my wife £4.99. The real tragedy is that she made me watch it all and it starts poorly and gets worse.
Do not waste your money on this absolute garbage.
Do not waste your money on this absolute garbage.
Did you know
- TriviaThe only adaptation of The War of the Worlds filmed at the actual Horsell Common and the sandpit mentioned in H.G. Wells's novel.
- GoofsAt the end, just after Dr Stint has briefed the survivors of how the Martians died from disease, and Herbert has spoken to his mother on the radio, you can see a busy main road in the background, with cars driving from left to right at the end of the lane. It does not look like society recovering, or any kind of convoy, just modern cars driving along.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Escape from Vault Disney: World's Deadliest S3E1 War of the Carnivores (2024)
- How long is War of the Worlds: The Attack?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Languages
- Also known as
- La Guerre des Mondes: L'Invasion
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 25 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for War of the Worlds: The Attack (2023)?
Answer