Last Words
IMDb RATING
4.7/10
404
YOUR RATING
It is 2085. A young man, one of the few survivors of the human community of old, embarks on a long voyage to find others.It is 2085. A young man, one of the few survivors of the human community of old, embarks on a long voyage to find others.It is 2085. A young man, one of the few survivors of the human community of old, embarks on a long voyage to find others.
- Awards
- 2 nominations total
Featured reviews
I am dying of pancreatic cancer right now so for me, this film had a special poignancy. If you care about humanity and appreciate living every moment in the present, you are likely to enjoy this film. It's also about the joy and power of film to document people's existence on this planet.
Kudos to the director for including so many delightful film clips, especially the clip from a rarely seen interview with Dennis Potter. Most of the clips are well-known such as Monty Python, Buster Keaton, etc.
Kudos to the director for including so many delightful film clips, especially the clip from a rarely seen interview with Dennis Potter. Most of the clips are well-known such as Monty Python, Buster Keaton, etc.
Actually the actors were pretty good, but the movie is very very badly made. It is an achievement in itself to ruin a movie like this. It looks like it was done on purpose or Jonathan Nossiter wanted to prank himself and everybody present in the movie.
It's very sad actually.
The whole storyline doesn't make sense. Scenes are not connected, sometimes it seems like they mashed up the script from multiple movies into this one. Actors are over acting when they obviously shouldn't. This movie could be a good material for students as a counter example of how NOT to make a movie.
The camera angles are also alright, the costumes, the scenes, are mostly good. It seems like they had the footage and just mashed up everything randomly and this came up on the other end. What a shame!
Maybe if it would be muted it would look good and a background footage at a party.
It's very sad actually.
The whole storyline doesn't make sense. Scenes are not connected, sometimes it seems like they mashed up the script from multiple movies into this one. Actors are over acting when they obviously shouldn't. This movie could be a good material for students as a counter example of how NOT to make a movie.
The camera angles are also alright, the costumes, the scenes, are mostly good. It seems like they had the footage and just mashed up everything randomly and this came up on the other end. What a shame!
Maybe if it would be muted it would look good and a background footage at a party.
As a matter of personal preference, I do not watch R rated movies. I chose this movie for two reasons ; one it was a featured selection at Cannes film festival and two it was PG-13. IT IS NOT PG - 13!! There is full frontal male and female nudity. Not just for a brief flash but for full scenes. There's also a female to male rape. There is also an extended close-up of the genitals of a hermaphrodite.
It's a dystopian movie that takes place in 2085 but the dates do not add up. Nick Nolte talks about seeing a rock concert in 1975-- that would make him over 115! This could've been a really interesting movie. Well it WAS an interesting movie but the fact that they threw in those completely unnecessary nude scenes ruined it for me.
It's a dystopian movie that takes place in 2085 but the dates do not add up. Nick Nolte talks about seeing a rock concert in 1975-- that would make him over 115! This could've been a really interesting movie. Well it WAS an interesting movie but the fact that they threw in those completely unnecessary nude scenes ruined it for me.
It's 2086 in a post-apocalyptic world. Kal believes that he is the last man on Earth. Two years earlier, he is roaming the world with his pregnant sister. She gets killed and then he encounters reclusive film collector Shakespeare (Nick Nolte). They find a surprising farming community led by Batlk (Charlotte Rampling) and former surgeon Zyberski (Stellan Skarsgård).
This is an artsy post-apocalyptic movie. It's long. The first half is slow. There are some interesting bits but mostly, it's not that compelling. It's not the first time in the movies that cinema is seen as the salvation of civilization. In a small aside, Nick Nolte's I Remember speech wouldn't make sense unless his character is over 100 years old. It's careless writing and indicative of the general level of writing.
This is an artsy post-apocalyptic movie. It's long. The first half is slow. There are some interesting bits but mostly, it's not that compelling. It's not the first time in the movies that cinema is seen as the salvation of civilization. In a small aside, Nick Nolte's I Remember speech wouldn't make sense unless his character is over 100 years old. It's careless writing and indicative of the general level of writing.
It was too damn long! Ok, we ge t the weird. But dude get it shorter! It was lovely but cut it bro. Ok change the bait man. My ggodnness now i know hy it was soi bad. Blah bah who dee whjoo. Really stop. There isa no reaso. Why this is the why.
Did you know
- TriviaCannes Film Festival - The Official Selection 2020 - The regulars.
- ConnectionsFeatures L'Arroseur arrosé (1895)
- How long is Last Words?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Languages
- Also known as
- Последние слова
- Filming locations
- Paestum, Capaccio, Salerno, Campania, Italy(as Greece: survivors' garden)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime2 hours 6 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content