[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Jonah Blechman, Jake Mosser, Jimmy Clabots, and Aaron Michael Davies in Another Gay Sequel: Gays Gone Wild! (2008)

User reviews

Another Gay Sequel: Gays Gone Wild!

39 reviews
4/10

It Tries So Hard, but Mostly Stays Limp

  • jaybeebrad
  • Dec 10, 2008
  • Permalink
5/10

Had me chuckling

Yes, this is gay, silly, dumb, offensive, trashy and pornographic film making -- but I still ended up chuckling for most of the 90 minutes.

This one had decent eye candy, more than its predecessor. Although sexier and grosser, this one was probably not as good as the first one. The plot was unfocused. I'm not sure they should have returned with Jonah Blechman and Scott Thompson in the same roles because their shticks seemed less original the second time around. The sequel also seemed to have more ham and cheese.

This is the first film I've seen with a reverse bell curve on IMDb.com. You're either gonna love this one or hate it. I think you should see it, but only if this kind of movie appeals to you. Personally, I wish the director would make more gay comedies. There is a certain coarse honesty and sophistication to these two films, despite it all. And there should be more gay comedies out there.
  • Laakbaar
  • Aug 8, 2014
  • Permalink
5/10

Comes up short

  • Dee-man
  • Dec 29, 2008
  • Permalink
2/10

Disappointment... putting it nicely

I did love the first movie. It ran with the idea of making a gay version of American Pie and ran with it. The character's became realistic and though it lost me at times it's charm held me till the end.

The second however, was an abomination. The script needed many many more edits before it made it into production. The fact that all of the actors had to be replaced was one of many problems. Their replacements were not completely thought out. Andy's in particular, seemed nothing like his character in the first.

However the premise still had some promise. Taking them all for spring break sounded very hilarious and had plenty of room for laughs and promiscuity. And we were instantly introduced to "Jaspers" our three antagonists. And Griff and Jarrod's budding relationship opened up the idea of sexual monogamy a real issue that many couples face today, a promise for some type of depth to the entire plot.

They failed.

It seemed like all the plot lines had promise even Nico's rather week like with a bad luck Tiki seems to be the set up for some hilarious consequences.

But then the script fails to deliver.

There was not enough prep put into this movie and there was not enough thought given to the final product. And finally the promise of yet another sequel "Gays in Space" sounds atrocious.
  • camyado
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • Permalink
1/10

A waste of film...and your time.

Gee, I need to write at least ten lines but can sum it up nicely: THIS MOVIE IS A PIECE JUNK AND NOT WORTH YOUR TIME. What were they producers thinking when they green lighted this mess. It is one of those films that make you feel embarrassed for the cast and want to kill the writers. No redeeming values. No comic value. Lousy acting. I could go on and on. Such is the sorry state of gay cinema. Let's see, the plot device behind this film is a content to determine who can screw and get screwed the most during spring break. As impossible as it many seem, this film makes "Justin Loves Kelly" seem like a work of art. No need to view this film. You have been things to do with your life.
  • jamesmccormack
  • Aug 15, 2009
  • Permalink
1/10

sad distant echo of the original Another Gay Movie

Tonight I sat down to watch the newly arrived "Another Gay Sequel" DVD, expecting it to at least live up to the standard of "Another Gay Movie" (which I had thoroughly enjoyed and can happily recommend). I found myself reaching for the remote to fast forward through too many scenes. The Sequel is really REALLY flaky, extra fluffy and totally pointless. There's nothing at all to be gained by watching it - certainly not any sense of entertainment. I won't even consider watching, let alone buying, a further sequel. Perez Hilton is probably the most annoying aspect of this film, but Ru Paul is hot on his heels for that honour. The basic fault lies in having such an inane script. The bevy of nice looking actors, no matter how naked, had no hope of saving this film.
  • jvframe
  • Dec 24, 2008
  • Permalink
1/10

Finally a movie that makes a gay go straight

'Another Gay Sequel: Gays Gone Wild' is quite possibly one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Ever. Ever. Ever. And here are words I never thought I would type: If this is the true gay lifestyle and if this is the only exposure someone has to the "gays," I'm going to have to agree with the late Jerry Farewell and condemn the lifestyle. This movie was so unfunny, so unpleasant, it was utterly painful to watch and yes, I had to continue to watch just to see each scene that got more disturbing than the last. I can't even give the cast/crew credit for trying, which I normally do; that's like rooting for the terrorists, for, at least they're attempting to make their voices heard. I've despised movies in the past, but rarely will one both make me cringe as well as almost vomit on how bad it is (Side note: don't eat while watching, as I did – seriously and no joke, I almost vomited.) Shameless product (websites) placements, God-awful attempts at spoofs, jokes – OK more accurately, just flat statements (there are no words to describe) – that are seen thousands frames in advance and loss of respect for the once great RuPaul, for he was in the movie long enough to know how incredibly bad of a decision to support these idiots. Perez Hilton runs around mocking religious anti-gays. Fine, we get it and yes, there's other ways to spread tolerance, or even ridiculing those you don't agree with. The only close-to-funny gag (yes singular) was them making fun of the original cast for failing to return due to "not being labeled as gay for doing two gay-themed movies." More likely, they simply read the script and knew they were above this (ah-hem) bottom-dwelling nightmare.
  • thesar-2
  • Jan 20, 2009
  • Permalink
5/10

So many negative reviews, give it a chance...are you expecting 'Milk' from a title like this?

This film is NOT supposed to be taken seriously, that's a given. It's a harmless bash at every gay stereotype you can imagine, it's camp, driven and funny.

Many moments in the film have that extreme cringe factor, but you have chosen to invest time in a movie titled 'Another Gay Movie: Gays Gone Wild' you can hardly expect subtleties like the camera veering off to record a fireplace while sexual activity is implied...

RuPaul and Lady Bunny bring classic drag comedy, while the main cast are easy on the eye and don't appall with their acting skills. The Cameos from Muffster and Nico's Mum are also welcomed with a wide grin.

I would say if you are bored and want to spend an hour and a half amused yet bemused, laughing but not really knowing what at and trying to guess the countless films this one parodies, go for it! Like I said it's harmless!
  • daniel111916041
  • Nov 7, 2016
  • Permalink
7/10

I Don't Think I've Ever Been So Offended In My Whole Life.

  • mcw6957
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • Permalink
2/10

Cringe-worthy and pointless. A big disappointment

I've finally got around to watching this movie tonight - albeit with Spanish subtitles - and it truly is ghastly. I, like most of the other reviewers here, really enjoyed the first movie which had life and spark to it. This has none. Yes, there's lots of good looking naked male flesh around but if anyone wants that we all know where to look. The plot is tasteless, and - for me - the scene where Scott Thompson as Mr Wilson (dressed in a dog costume) mistakenly humps his own son, then follows a flurry of vomiting from him, his son and his son's love interest is beyond tasteless. This film is utterly charmless, inane, and I agree that watching paint dry is preferable. I hope that this sequel is just a glitch and a third film in the series will go for charm and not paint all us gays out to be butt-chasing, screaming queens.
  • imdb-17369
  • Feb 24, 2010
  • Permalink
9/10

Crass, gross, juvenile, and ... downright delinquent! And deep? Loved it!

  • arusj
  • Sep 8, 2008
  • Permalink

Cheesy, clichéd and unfunny

This film is about four guys having a crazy holiday in Florida, where they participate a race called "Gays Gone Wild".

The title of "Another Gay Sequel: Gays Gone Wild!" is very cheesy, which is exactly what this film is about. There is plenty of cheap and dirty humour, with terribly clichéd characters doing terribly clichéd things. There is hardly any credibility in this film even having considered that it is a brain off comedy. Moreover, the "Gays Gone Wild" contest is basically promiscuity, which is grossly irresponsible to promote.

"Another Gay Sequel: Gays Gone Wild!" is a disappointing comedy, and it is not really that funny either.
  • Gordon-11
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • Permalink
7/10

Better than the first.

Once moderately successful, there is an instant desire to keep stretching the idea until it is exhausted. Following the example of American Pie, the lovable characters appear again, almost entirely played by other actors. Despite this, the secondary and guest stars make the film even more enjoyable than the first by reaching the limit within the vulgarity that is the norm these days. Although it is not a film suitable for all audiences, the sum of clichés and a gigantic number of references to gay culture makes the experience of seeing the film unforgettable. It's not a masterpiece but at least it's better than a lot of stuff being made today.
  • dasa108
  • Nov 4, 2022
  • Permalink
5/10

Not as good as the first one!

Okay. This one is much worst than the first one.

Of course they couldn't make it as good as the first one...but still..

The first thing that I disliked at first sight, was the actor change. I mean the title says it "the sequel", but of all the 4 boys, just one is the same. Although one of the new guys is similar to the previous, all the others are much different, and they are not so good. I mean it. They are terrible.

The story itself isn't that bad. But there's not that passion from the first one that would make you cry; side perhaps from the mermaid.

I really don't recommend this movie for the folks that saw the first one. It's really disappointing. It still has some funny stuff...but....
  • Paulinho17
  • Dec 28, 2008
  • Permalink
1/10

Don'T Waste Your Time

To say this movie is not only a waste of your time, a waste of time of anyone involved with this "film" and a waste of the energy and anything else associated with this disaster is an understatement...

I did not find one even one scene minorly funny scene, yet found at least a handful which were totally nasty and disgusting...

If this is what passes for humor in the "gay community" today...then let me be an outcast as I cannot find one positive comment to make about this "film" unless you count finally seeing the end of it as a positive...I cannot find one reason why anyone looking at the screenplay for this could conceive why this should have ever been made...were they hoping the mindless sheep would flock (pun intended) to see this film?...I think that whoever heads the studio that made this should be immediately terminated...although this same studio will probably be the next one in line asking for a handout...oops I mean a bailout...oops, I mean a loan so they don't have to file bankruptcy...this studio should go down in flames!
  • daveslists
  • Jan 2, 2009
  • Permalink
1/10

Total crap

A total piece of s#@t! Save yourself two hours of your life and do something meaningful, like watch paint dry!

I really enjoyed the first one and was anxious to see the sequel. I cannot recall if I laughed once. I certainly squirmed a lot, groaned and shook my head.

I have often heard that it is difficult to get a move from script to the screen; too bad that adage did not hold true in this instance.

Ru Paul and Perez Hilton were absolutely awful! The worst of a bad lot (and that is say a great deal!). Brent Corrigan's butt was very nice to look at, but I can find that on-line, along with the rest of his naked body!

Seriously, save yourself and watch something else.
  • canadianguy62
  • Feb 11, 2010
  • Permalink
2/10

A LITTLE better than the first but that's faint praise

The four "lovable" gay guys from "Another Gay Movie" go to Ft. Lauderdale for Spring Break. It seems there's a contest called "Gays Gone Wild" going on there--the object is to be the one to have the most sex partners. Andy (Jake Mosser) is all for it but then falls for handsome Luis (Euriamias Losada). Luis loves him...but won't have sex. Monogamous couple Griff (Aaron Michael Davies) and Jarod (Jimmy Clabots) decide to sleep around--but will their relationship survive? Nico (Jonah Blechman) falls in love with Stan the Merman (Brent Corrigan). Yeah it's stupid but the beach party movies of the 1960s had a mermaid so why not a merman? OK--I HATED the first one. I found it disgusting and horrendously unfunny...but I saw it at a preview and didn't know it was a gross out comedy. This time I KNEW what I was getting into. The humor is still disgusting (unless you find extreme sexual humiliation and bleeding funny) but I was able to deal with it. Still this isn't a GOOD movie by any means.

It's very colorful and the cast is rearing to go. They're all attractive and Clabots and Mosser have beautiful bodies. There's no frontal nudity of them though--just back. The acting is not bad. Mosser overacts dreadfully at first but calms down as the movie progresses and gives out a very affecting performance. Davies and Clabots portray a gay couple realistically and are quite good. Blechman annoys me (WAY too femme) but he was good. Corrigan (whose did gay porn) is quite handsome and charming as a merman. The movie also has a few serious and well-done moments with the guys discussing relationships. Also there are plenty of buff good-looking guys strolling around near naked throughout most of the film. Some great eye candy! However--there's one problem. It's really not that funny. I admit I laughed out loud a few times but not much. Also the gross-out humor is out in full force here--two sequences involving non-stop vomiting and Crazy Glue used as lube are just beyond sick. Also the script wanders all over the place--characters and scenes come up out of nowhere! To make it worse there are parodies of old horror movies thrown into the script seemingly at random. Now I LOVE horror movies and I got the parodies--but they're totally out of place in a gay comedy. My audience sat through them in dead silence.

So, aside from the color, a few good moments, some good acting and plenty of good-looking men this really isn't that good. I can honestly give this only a 2. Seriously--the guys are incredible but the movie is really a chore to sit through sometimes.
  • preppy-3
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • Permalink
2/10

Sort Of Disappointing Sequel To An Already Disappointing Sex Comedy.

Ho-hum... Like the first movie,if they hadn't put in all the gross out scenes and its over-reliance on "guest star" cameos,as well as a tighter(no pun intended)story,this might have been a better movie instead the disappointing,muddled mess that it is.

Performances from OK(i kinda liked the guys who played Andy & Jarod and Jonah Blechman(?) is a stitch,as always)to the "WTF?".(Perez Hilton,anyone..HELLO!)

The storyline is all over the place,however Again,not a terrible movie but not a winner either.

Stick with the movies it parodies.
  • filmfan2
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • Permalink
1/10

Don't waste two hours of your life watching this drivel

  • simon-1369
  • Mar 7, 2009
  • Permalink
2/10

A total disaster

  • mnpollio
  • Aug 10, 2010
  • Permalink
9/10

Switch your "reality-based" brain off and just enjoy the madness!

First things first; this is not like the first movie. In the first movie you have crazy scenarios occurring within a plausible/realistic context, and the narrative of the story was clear-set and followed a linear unfurling path. However in the sequel, reality has no business here. There's numerous addresses to the camera, ridiculously naff special effects, references to the fact that this is just a movie, for god's sake there's a mythical sea creature in the story!

You can tell from the very beginning of the movie that the aim is not so much to tell a heartwarming coming-of-age story, but rather to make you laugh as much as possible by presenting crazy over-the-top, sometimes revolting, gags which it does with gusto. In fairness, this had to be their approach to making this movie. If they were going to make this a serious and realistic follow-on to the last movie, how could they have possibly explained away why three of the four main leads look completely different?! No, they had to just forget about reality and just go all out for funny gags. And on this level it worked; I laughed throughout the whole movie. Result!!

The only thing I would criticize is the use of "actors" who can't actually act - I'm talking about you Perez Hilton! I cringed whenever he was on screen. It was like watching the antics of the drunken slut at a party; you just felt embarrassed for him.

Jonah Blechman deserves a paragraph of praise. He definitely stole the show in this movie. From his zany uber-camp performances to his heartfelt monologue; kudos Jonah. I don't think the movie would have been anywhere near as good if he had wimped-out and jumped ship like three other certain actors.

Biggest surprise; Rupaul is actually a really good, natural and convincing actor. We don't see enough of him on this side of the Atlantic.

Look, just watch the movie with the intention of having a laugh. Switch off the nit-picking film-critic part of your brain and you will enjoy this movie.
  • rayjaygee
  • Jan 11, 2009
  • Permalink
1/10

Abysmal

  • Jdmaldonado814
  • Jul 4, 2012
  • Permalink
1/10

Almost, and not even enough

It's very rare i turn off movies, especially with a gay theme and rarer that I comment on them, but this movie was so bad I had to do it. The first movie was so great; I still watch it over and over again, but this sequel was filled with nothing but tired and forced humor that the first movie didn't have to try for. I'm not sure if it's the director's fault, but it was such a letdown. I think they tried too hard to be funny or they might have rushed just to get a movie out, but it was just plain terrible. The guys were totally cute and overall did a good job, but maybe they should have taken the time to watch both movies one after another to see where they started to change what didn't need to be changed. I'll still buy the movie to support the cause and sorry for the negative review, but come on Todd, you must have friends that will be honest with you.
  • musicmen04
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • Permalink
1/10

Don't even think about it

  • mrfabulous1025
  • May 1, 2014
  • Permalink
2/10

Much worse than the original...and that's saying a lot

While the original was mildly entertaining, I'm really not sure why there needed to be a sequel. It's not like there was really more to say. The jokes certainly didn't get any funnier...in fact it went in the opposite direction. I wouldn't recommend watching this at all.
  • Coralknight
  • Nov 29, 2019
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.