A ruthless mercenary renounces violence after learning his soul is bound for hell. When a young girl is kidnapped and her family slain by a sorcerer's murderous cult, he is forced to fight a... Read allA ruthless mercenary renounces violence after learning his soul is bound for hell. When a young girl is kidnapped and her family slain by a sorcerer's murderous cult, he is forced to fight and seek his redemption slaying evil.A ruthless mercenary renounces violence after learning his soul is bound for hell. When a young girl is kidnapped and her family slain by a sorcerer's murderous cult, he is forced to fight and seek his redemption slaying evil.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 1 win & 1 nomination total
Christian Dunkley-Clark
- Lieutenant Malthus
- (as Christian Michael Dunkley Clark)
Samuel Roukin
- Marcus Kane
- (as Sam Roukin)
- …
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
in my book there are 3 classes of fantasy.
high, full of goblins elves and knights in shining amour.
low, a fantasy world without all the classical elements no elves no fairies no blazing swords,
and dark, born from madman's nightmares and populated with them dark place dark worlds and a serious take on the genre.
Kane falls into the latter,
for a low budget film its certainly well done, the character is fairly close to the story's, the props and costumes are reasonably accurate.
the fighting direction is also true to the character no frivolous swashbuckling here lethal moves to great effect.
Kane was not some marvelesque hero wasting motion and energy in his strikes, as one character in a story put it "he is the most lethal swordsmen I've ever seen". (paraphrased).
some parts of it could have been handled better the ending or a slight tightening up of the exposition parts, but all in all well worth watching.
is it worth seeing yes. but bear in mind this is not a lord of the rings style film, nor is this die hard 1600.
there is a lot of dialog and a lot of religious references. this is a dark fantasy film with a touch of horror, aiming to reveal Kane's hitherto unknown origins.
if you like to support good independent films go see it if all your interested in is mindless action..... do what you will.
high, full of goblins elves and knights in shining amour.
low, a fantasy world without all the classical elements no elves no fairies no blazing swords,
and dark, born from madman's nightmares and populated with them dark place dark worlds and a serious take on the genre.
Kane falls into the latter,
for a low budget film its certainly well done, the character is fairly close to the story's, the props and costumes are reasonably accurate.
the fighting direction is also true to the character no frivolous swashbuckling here lethal moves to great effect.
Kane was not some marvelesque hero wasting motion and energy in his strikes, as one character in a story put it "he is the most lethal swordsmen I've ever seen". (paraphrased).
some parts of it could have been handled better the ending or a slight tightening up of the exposition parts, but all in all well worth watching.
is it worth seeing yes. but bear in mind this is not a lord of the rings style film, nor is this die hard 1600.
there is a lot of dialog and a lot of religious references. this is a dark fantasy film with a touch of horror, aiming to reveal Kane's hitherto unknown origins.
if you like to support good independent films go see it if all your interested in is mindless action..... do what you will.
For me this came out of nowhere. I wasn't expecting much but was absolutely delighted by just how good Solomon Kane was.
Great acting, again a surprise, dazzling special effects and a story that was enjoyable to follow.
Good film fun :)
Great acting, again a surprise, dazzling special effects and a story that was enjoyable to follow.
Good film fun :)
'Solomon Kane' does twice as much with half the budget of similar genre films such as 'Van Helsing', 'Season of the Witch' and the recent 'Conan the Barbarian' (Which, like 'Solomon Kane', is based on a character created by Robert E. Howard). Unfortunately, doubling up those films still only adds up to average.
For a while it feels as if 'Solomon Kane' might actually be something special. Anchored by James Purefoy (channeling Hugh Jackman), and supported by strong performances from Rachel Hurd-Wood and the late Pete Postlethwaite, the first act firmly establishes a character and stakes that we care about. But around the half way point it begins to run out of steam, settling for generic genre conventions executed with little of the flair and none of the human focus evidenced earlier in the film.
'Solomon Kane' had all the pieces to be something special. That it ends up merely being a serviceable time-waster is ironically more frustrating than if it were simply a bad film.
For a while it feels as if 'Solomon Kane' might actually be something special. Anchored by James Purefoy (channeling Hugh Jackman), and supported by strong performances from Rachel Hurd-Wood and the late Pete Postlethwaite, the first act firmly establishes a character and stakes that we care about. But around the half way point it begins to run out of steam, settling for generic genre conventions executed with little of the flair and none of the human focus evidenced earlier in the film.
'Solomon Kane' had all the pieces to be something special. That it ends up merely being a serviceable time-waster is ironically more frustrating than if it were simply a bad film.
If you took the time to find it, then you wont be disappointed with this solid, old fashioned sword and sorcery movie.
The tales of Solomon Kane have been around longer than most, the character first appearing in mass market print back in the late twenties, but they've not been filmed. Many others, borrowing from it have been filmed so you will be quite familiar with the twists and turns having seen them elsewhere. The saving grace here is that it's all done quite well. James Purefoy is every part the tortured warrior and it's good to see Max Von Sydow and the legend that is Pete Poslethwaite up on the big screen. It's a creepy, dark movie at times and the extra effort they've put into the set design and cinematography really helps to set the scene. The story nips along to a satisfying conclusion. The fight choreography is very well done and FX are good as well.
The tales of Solomon Kane have been around longer than most, the character first appearing in mass market print back in the late twenties, but they've not been filmed. Many others, borrowing from it have been filmed so you will be quite familiar with the twists and turns having seen them elsewhere. The saving grace here is that it's all done quite well. James Purefoy is every part the tortured warrior and it's good to see Max Von Sydow and the legend that is Pete Poslethwaite up on the big screen. It's a creepy, dark movie at times and the extra effort they've put into the set design and cinematography really helps to set the scene. The story nips along to a satisfying conclusion. The fight choreography is very well done and FX are good as well.
The film is one of those things that you immediately "feel" it is wrong. No known actors except old guys like Max von Sydow, who get a small role anyway, an almost unknown lead character and a lot of attitude, like the movie is taking itself really seriously. Most of this kind of movies end up as pretentious flops.
Solomon Kane, however, did not. It was a reasonable movie, given the low production values and the video game like story. The thing is, the people working on it obviously made an effort. Strangely enough, it seems this sort of effort is what lacks in many films these days, even high budget ones, so this lifts Solomon Kane quite a lot.
Unfortunately, the film was not great. It was, I feel, the best they could do under the circumstances, and I applaud that, though. Better than The Book of Eli, but still the same superheroy feeling.
Solomon Kane, however, did not. It was a reasonable movie, given the low production values and the video game like story. The thing is, the people working on it obviously made an effort. Strangely enough, it seems this sort of effort is what lacks in many films these days, even high budget ones, so this lifts Solomon Kane quite a lot.
Unfortunately, the film was not great. It was, I feel, the best they could do under the circumstances, and I applaud that, though. Better than The Book of Eli, but still the same superheroy feeling.
Did you know
- TriviaOne of the unforeseen problems the production encountered in shooting night-time scenes on location in the Czech Republic was the constant hooting of owls.
- Goofs(at around 1 min) In the film, ships are shown flying the British Union Jack flag with the caption "North Africa: 1600". However, the first variant of the Union Jack (the one shown) wasn't used until 1606, with the current version of the flag not seen until 1801.
- Quotes
Solomon Kane: If I kill you, I am bound for hell. It is a price I shall gladly pay.
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $45,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $19,652,185
- Runtime1 hour 44 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content