IMDb RATING
5.0/10
4.4K
YOUR RATING
Ron wants to marry Melinda. He must first survive a bachelor party used by Melinda's brother-in-law to kill the wedding.Ron wants to marry Melinda. He must first survive a bachelor party used by Melinda's brother-in-law to kill the wedding.Ron wants to marry Melinda. He must first survive a bachelor party used by Melinda's brother-in-law to kill the wedding.
Sandra Seeling Lipski
- Gerda
- (as Sandra Seeling)
Erika Dawn Smith
- Hedda
- (as Erika Smith)
Stacy Ann Rose
- Judith
- (as Stacy-Ann Rose)
Featured reviews
Forget almost all casting Danny Jacobs as the weird Jewish made a remarkable performance with clean behavior and saves the picture, he was really funny in all scenes, mainly in the whirlpool bath when he stuck the dick in the hole, following with on bath with others odd guest inside, Harland Williams has a fine moments but far away than the Jewish, this sequel made by the same producers of the first one was very regretful over the results, but in general way quite often the sequels are inferior than the originals!!!
Resume:
First watch: 2015 / How many: 2 / Source: DVD / Rating: 6
Resume:
First watch: 2015 / How many: 2 / Source: DVD / Rating: 6
Lol my boyfriend got it at a pawn shop n I expected it to b sooo stupid I actually laughed a couple times not the worst comedy I've ever seen
I thought when i bought this ex-rental DVD, this gonna be a crappy movie, but still enjoyable, and for 3 euros. But when I put it in and was watching it, I really liked it. It was funny, characters where funny. I won't win any prices but an entertaining movie for a night with your friends. But the point people give that movie only is made so they could put nudity in it, is kinda lame. It's also in the 80's one (the nudity). It is part of those kind of movies. Where the nudity is totally useless are in the movies from the makers of epic movie, etc. they put a naked girl in a scene which got not any purpose.
If you like these genre movies, this is a must-have (but only if it cost a few bucks)
If you like these genre movies, this is a must-have (but only if it cost a few bucks)
When I first heard they were doing a sequel to one of my favorite '80's films, Bachelor Party, i was skeptical. When I heard no one from the original would be in it, I thought it blasphemy. When I started watching it & realized they were trying to do a remake, I found it outright heresy!! All the laughs and memorable parts of the original all gone replaced with tired worn-out jokes, lame dialog, and mediocre acting. The plot is the same as the first, guy's getting married, his friends throw him a party, other jealous guy tries to break up the wedding, yada, yada, yada. I hang my head in shame not only because I watched this laugh-free movie (I was tricked by a friend), but also because it exists in the first place. The abundant nudity is the only reason I didn't slip into a coma.
My Grade: F
Eye Candy: Paula LaBaredas, Arianna Coltellacci, Erika Smith , Claudia Costa, Diana Vilskaya, Mariann Gavelo, Dena Carman, Ashley Totin, La Trice Perry, Jennifer Steele all get topless
DVD Extras: Commentary by Director James Ryan and actors Warren Christie, Harland Williams, Danny Jacobs, & Josh Cooke; 18 deleted scenes; Making of featurette; 'Analysis of a stripper fight'; Gag reel, Theatrical trailer, and Trailers for "The Onion Movie", & "In the Name of the King" (another 'winner' *shudders*)
My Grade: F
Eye Candy: Paula LaBaredas, Arianna Coltellacci, Erika Smith , Claudia Costa, Diana Vilskaya, Mariann Gavelo, Dena Carman, Ashley Totin, La Trice Perry, Jennifer Steele all get topless
DVD Extras: Commentary by Director James Ryan and actors Warren Christie, Harland Williams, Danny Jacobs, & Josh Cooke; 18 deleted scenes; Making of featurette; 'Analysis of a stripper fight'; Gag reel, Theatrical trailer, and Trailers for "The Onion Movie", & "In the Name of the King" (another 'winner' *shudders*)
I wonder how much this movie actually has got to do with the 1984 movie "Bachelor Party", starring Tom Hanks. Is this movie even an official sequel? This movie is lacking in every department and you're obviously better off not watching it.
For a comedy this movie simply isn't good or funny enough. It relies mostly on the character's their stereotypical assessments, rather then the movie actually features some good, original and funny moments.
Of course there also is very little story present and the movie nude breast than script pages. You just keep waiting for things to finally start off. There is a main plot line in it somewhere but that one is so terribly unoriginal and gets executed so poorly in the movie that it feels more as if it's something non-existent. I guess there even is a message and moral story in it somewhere but this again is so terribly unoriginal and poorly done in the movie that it simply does not work out.
It's basically a typical teenage comedy, with lots of sex jokes and nudity, only without the teenage main characters, which makes the story all the more sad and tasteless. The movie makes some really wrong jokes, that are misplaced for any type of movie.
I regret ever watching this.
3/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
For a comedy this movie simply isn't good or funny enough. It relies mostly on the character's their stereotypical assessments, rather then the movie actually features some good, original and funny moments.
Of course there also is very little story present and the movie nude breast than script pages. You just keep waiting for things to finally start off. There is a main plot line in it somewhere but that one is so terribly unoriginal and gets executed so poorly in the movie that it feels more as if it's something non-existent. I guess there even is a message and moral story in it somewhere but this again is so terribly unoriginal and poorly done in the movie that it simply does not work out.
It's basically a typical teenage comedy, with lots of sex jokes and nudity, only without the teenage main characters, which makes the story all the more sad and tasteless. The movie makes some really wrong jokes, that are misplaced for any type of movie.
I regret ever watching this.
3/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
Did you know
- TriviaAs indicated in the making-of featurette, this was intended to be a remake of Le palace en folie (1984), but was released as a sequel instead.
- GoofsIn the scene where Ron puts lipstick on first he smears it on the left side of his lips, but in the next scene it's clearly on the right.
- ConnectionsFollows Le palace en folie (1984)
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $6,000,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 44 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content