Last Stand of the 300

This came out just after the movie 300 and was so obviously designed to cash in on the hype. The only difference is the Spartans are not fighting in leather nappies with painted on abs.

As such it falls flat for me. And its mostly just the same old glorified re hash with a little more detail, like why the Persian fleet did not just sail pass Thermopylae and drop men off and surround the Greeks.

A lot is generalized and a few key events appear to differ from the original account by Herodotus. It may not appear significant but if you think where people are, what they were doing and what did they know at what time, the story does not stack up.

There is more recent, interesting and different analysis out there, just google 300 Spartans the real story.

We see many historical scenes in this film. And we expect to see and hear an impartial and accurate narrative. But unfortunately, this film not only completely violates the historical texts, but also mocks and humiliates the persian race. This is very unfortunate.

This is a magnificent documentary produced by BBC in similar style to ¨Anibal¨, here is again splendidly brought to life the heroic events about the battle of Thermopylae. The deeds (480 B. C) are correctly re-enacted by a plethora of actors and extras , adding background made by 3D computer generator. Every little detail has been given so much attention, as costume, environment and production desig n. This historic tale completes to enlarge the story by extending the deeds developing in the picture titled ¨300¨ (2006) by Zack Snyder, starred by Gerard Butler as Leonidas, and ¨The 300 Spartans¨(1962) by Rudolph Mate with Richard Egan and Ralph Richardson as Themistocles , both movies limit the story to the battle . As ¨The last stand¨ adds the history about kings Persians : Ciro the Great and Jonican riots ; king Dario and battle of Marathon, including the famous race carried out by Filipides until Athens , the fire of Athens ordered by Xerxes and his imperial body guard of 10.000 immortals, etc... These events aren't exposed in ¨300¨ by Zack Snyder that restricts its filming on the preparation and battle of Thermopylae , the only way to arrive to Athens. The impact of the battle was impressive and the Hellens lost their fear for the Persian conqueror and organized their defense and allowing the Greek city states to create an army to retain the Persians .

Thanks this documentary movie we learn a lot of knowledges. As how king Leonidas led a small army called Falange formed by 300 Spartans named Hoplitas and wielding the shield Heplon , plus 700 Thespians, while the soldiers Phocios sent by Leonidas to protect their flanks flee . They hold off an invading Persian army formed by thousands of soldiers, the great historian Heredotus , possibly exaggerating, wrote that they were 1.700.000, commanded by king Xerxes. We also know of how the Athenian leader Themistocles managed as a great leader by formally placing the Athenas polis under supreme command of Sparta and navigating along strait at Artemisum gets defeat Persian navy . Themistocles commanded a large navy formed by ships called Trirremes which vanquished the Persian warships in the battles of Salamian, Platea and Mycala. This phenomenal documentary-movie will appeal to history and epic events buffs.

I watched this program the night before I saw "300," and I was glad that I did.

I had heard people complaining about "300" not being historically accurate, and while being true, that movie was meant to entertain, not teach history.

This program goes into depth about the lives of the Spartans and circumstances surrounding the battle at Thermopylae.

As far as documentaries go, it is above average quality and certainly worth seeing of you have or plan to watch "300" or are just interested in this part of history period. The reenactments are good and the scholarly commentary is very informative. I also think that they had the movie in mind when they produced this show, so that the progression overlaps and lets the viewer make a good pre- or post-viewing comparison between Hollywood and history.

I really despise documentaries that repeat over and over again the same information, then the break for publicity, then summarizing the information repeated before. The actors in the reenactment were very well chosen, the historians charismatic, the graphics OK, but the information could have been gathered in a few pages. Therefore I rate this movie below average.

But the battle was pretty amazing. There wasn't only a heroic component, but also a naval battle, a great Greek strategist (Themistocles), the burning of Athens and another naval battle.

As an easy documentary, it's OK, but the repetition of information makes it annoying.