Contractor

I don't really know what I was expecting when I went into this. I usually don't waste my time with direct-to-video garbage, but I was sick and very bored. I'd just watched Snipes' earlier vehicle Incontrôlable (2004) which I thought was actually pretty decent, and in no way deserving of all the hate that's been heaped upon it. After seeing the very poor rating of that film, and liking it, I saw this film's lukewarm rating and thought it must be at least ok. I was wrong, and I want my time back.

Let me just say that I usually go into films with expectations. I learn about most movies through this or some other website, so I've usually read about a movie before seeing it, and I pick the ones I want to see. That said, I go into the ones I've picked really wanting to like them, so when they're not good, I'm disappointed, even to the point of being annoyed. Maybe i should change my approach, but this film just didn't meet my expectations.

The plot is wholly generic. A legendary, but retired, government assassin is called in for one last mission, which is to take out a ruthless dictator and terrorist. Once he completes the job, he attempts to leave the country, but is framed for another murder before he can. On the run, he must rely on his skills to survive. Sounds like "Bourne meets any Steven Seagal movie". It's very unoriginal, and it is just a rehashing of every other action movie you've ever seen.

The characters are all bland. I like Wesley Snipes, a lot actually, and I'd even go as far as to call myself a fan. He was the only reason I gave this film a second glance, and the only reason I pressed play. He was alright, even though he didn't have tons of dialogue. He's not as charismatic as he was in the roles of his prime, but he's nowhere near Seagal territory when it comes to wooden acting. He is onscreen a lot, but there's also a lot of time where he's not onscreen. When he is though, he's sitting and/or staring, and occasionally speaking. The other characters are all stock characters recycled from other films. Bleh.

Director Josef Rusnak, obviously an amateur, didn't do horribly. Most of the movie was at least watchable, but he went with shaky, frenetic camera work reminiscent of Tony Scott. Scott's newer, frenetic style, is most notable in Man on Fire (2004), but at least there the style fit the mood. Here, Rusnak's obvious imitation is unnecessary, and just looks clumsy.

Now, I can forgive a generic plot and mediocre characters in this kind of film. It is a brainless B action movie after all, right? I've come for action, and a long as I get at least a fair amount of decent action scenes then I'll be good. Well this so-called "action movie" can't even deliver that. The trailer, which seemed to promise a good amount of action, gravely misled me. There are barely any action scenes, basically like, three or four small ones, in the movie, all of which are incredibly brief (the last one was ok), and poorly edited. Worst of all, Wesley Snipes has one fight scene. ONE FIGHT SCENE. We've come to see Wesley fight and don't get that at all. It seems like Snipes is starting to go the Seagal route of doing fewer and fewer action scenes in his movies, which is sad. Another scene with potential is stupidly obscured by strobe lighting, for no reason. Just why. Several more action scenes, and this would've been better.

The movie asked me to care about its story and characters, and attempted to privilege the story over the action. It's a risky move, one I can respect, but the problem is that it wasn't a great story and the characters weren't great. When there wasn't any action, I was left with the story, which was unsatisfying. The script could've used more action to keep the slow story moving, and at least make it more interesting. Maybe I should re-evaluate it, but my time is too valuable too me.

I wanted so badly to like the movie, but I have to be honest with myself. If you're a Snipes fan, then I guess you could watch it just to say you did. Otherwise, avoid it. It really is a waste of time.

Not your typical Wesley Snipes kind of movie.(not really anyway) The acting isn't horrible. It was movie I watched it at mid evening with some popcorn, and it kept me entertained most of the time. It had a few good action scenes, but mostly it was a drama movie. The plot is by no means original either, but it plays out OK I guess. Snipes definitely wasn't at his best here. I haven't seen the other movie that is the same story, so I can't say which is better. Although I didn't feel the need to pause it for refills and pit-stops, So I gave it a 5/10. I wouldn't go to a theater to see it, but its good for a movie night when/if it gets released on cable/satellite. -P.F.

Every film has a heart. Some hearts are more special than the others. But you are bound to get a wrong impression if you draw your inference without knowing where the heart is.

To the plebeian crowd, if Wesley Snipes is on the poster, that means some semi-mindless non-stop action, with a streak of silly humour once in a while, is coming their way. But Wesley never signed an agreement about that, did he now? This is not an action film, though you see some action in it.

First of all, it is a very low budget film, so don't go all tough and smart criticizing it. Those B-movies, which come to TV only late at night because other slots are for those blockbusters, can certainly not be measured against The Art of War or Blade. The Contractor is a simple, low budget film that shows a little girl's bond with an assassin, whose mission has gone wrong and who has fallen the prey of his own employers. While the action sequences and other things are inadvertently done, very special care has been taken of those moments that reflect the warmth of feelings. Lena Heady was not a necessary recruit for this film, her role any pretty face could play. But I like her, so I am glad she did it.

Some low budget, non-famous films sometimes leave lasting impressions. Maybe they fail overall in box office and audience poll, but sometimes there can be very heartfelt elements in such films. I watched it late at night and liked it for what it is. I was not disappointed for what it was not. Because if I wanted someone other film, I would watch some other film.

But of course, idiots have minds (and comments on IMDb) of their own.

Wesley Snipes is an ex-killer for the CIA, living contentedly on a ranch. He's asked to come back to kill a bad, bad man.... and realizes it's a set-up to get him killed. He also needs to take care of 15-year-old Eliza Bennett because the writers must have seen THE PROFESSIONAL and said "I can do that!"

No they can't. It's a decently acted movie -- it's got Charles Dance and Lena Headley -- but it's so derivative that you'll watch it and wonder as it plods self-importantly through its plot points, why they stole this particular twist from that movie, instead of a different plot twist from another. Or any of ten others.

It went straight to video. Now it's on the higher-numbered cable channels.

A non-stop thriller with intrigue , twists , turns and routine interpretation make up for the charming presence of the little girl Eliza Bennett and her sensitive relation with Wesley Snipes. Here Wesley Snipes performs an ex-C. I. A. Operative , Agent James Dial, whose career took a turn south with one botched mission . He is asked to take out terrorist Ali Mahmud Jahar (Nikolai Sotirov), but things go wrong . On the run and bleeding profusely, James makes his way to the safe house,mand along the way , he meets curious twelve-year-old neighbor Emily Day (Eliza Bennett) . Dial to realize he's been set up by his former employer , Jeremy Collins (Ralph Brown). Snipes' role manages to keep low profile long enough to clear their name . With the official authorities (Charles Dance , Lena Headey, playing father and daughter , the same as Game of Thrones) and his betrayer chasing him, and in spite of being a black man travelling alone in England , he must fight to survive against the nasty undercover agents and save his little friend . The world's greatest marksman is now a marked man...!

The movie displays suspense , thriller , unstopped action , high body-count and lots of violence when the killings happen . It's an average actioner movie with some entertaining moments but also with no sense scenes . The thrilling plot is plain and simple , dealing with a trained operative , subject to an intense manhunt who makes no real attempt to disguise himself ; however, the picture is made up for the agreeable presence of the sympathetic little girl Eliza Bennett to be followed an interesting TV/cinematic career . Both , Wesley Snipes and Eliza Bennett will depelop an enjoyable friendship , including a feeling finale. Wesley is nice as action hero , his early performances were as a serious actor in dramas , later turning as tough action man in films with big budget like¨Money train¨,¨Murder at 1600¨, ¨US Marshall¨ and ¨Blade trilogy¨, among others . Nowadays , he only plays movies in middling and low budget , such as ¨Unstoppable¨,¨7 seconds¨, ¨Chaos¨,¨The marksman¨, ¨The Hunter¨, ¨Armed Response¨ , ¨Gallow walkers¨, and ¨Cut Throat City¨. The movie benefits itself from a veteran Brit cast , such as : Lena Headey, Ralph Brown , Charles Dance , Gemma Jones and John Standing .

The motion picture shot in London was professionally directed by the German Josef Rusnak , though with no originality, because we had seen these kinds of stories before and much better. Josef began working as a director in his native country with enough success up to U. S. co-productions filmed in English . Rusnak has developed his career mainly in the genres of suspense and terror as 'It's alive' , but also has his touches of science fiction as 'Level 13' at his best , drama as 'Valerie' , 'Quiet days in Hollywood' , 'Beyond' and action with two Wesley Snipes vehicles as 'The contractor' and 'Art of war 2' . Rating : 5 .5/10. Average but acceptable and passable . Well worth watching . The flick will appeal to Wesley Snipes and Eliza Bennett fans.