[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro
James Callis and Tricia Helfer in Battlestar Galactica (2004)

User reviews

33

Battlestar Galactica

15 reviews
10/10

Contrary to popular misunderstanding, this is not the pilot episode

The poor reviews posted here seem to be based on a common misunderstanding: that this is a nonsensical and boring introduction to a supposedly highly praised series. This is due to a huge flaw in the way in which Battlestar Galactica is presented on IMDb and on streaming services. "33" is technically not the first episode of the series. In actual fact, there is a two-part pilot miniseries (running 180 minutes) which sets up the events of the series. It's typically packaged separately, which causes a great deal of confusion for those who are not aware of the proper viewing order. A serious flaw on the part of the creators, to be sure. But one might understand better if the series is viewed from the proper beginning.

Additionally, one should also be aware that this is not a traditional sci-fi. If you're looking for blinking lights and transporters and long-winded conversation about fancy futuristic technology... look somewhere else. This show is about human behavior and the human condition. It's about people first and foremost; it just happens to take place in space. In the same way that a show taking place in the western United States doesn't automatically make it a Western genre series about the Wild West. Do Battlestar fans consider it sci-fi? Absolutely. But it's a reinvention of sci-fi.

Those who take issue with the mention of god/gods have clearly missed the point of the underlying social commentary. They've also overlooked the obvious possibility for sci-fi to put science and reason to the concept of gods and higher powers, or to view all of these concepts from a philosophical view, which is where Battlestar differs from sci-fi of the past. While previous shows in this genre took a more literal approach with "cool technology" and gimmicks, Battlestar sets the stage with how people react emotionally to fear, and war, and loss, and trauma, and all of the flaws in the human condition. It makes us think about our own humanity-and what makes us human. One needs only to look at present day sci-fi to see how Battlestar influenced the genre and changed everything (even current Stark Trek incarnations) to embrace serialized dramatic storytelling with darker tones and more human substance, now preferring that structure over old-fashioned isolated, self-contained episodes in which everything resets back to normal at the end of the hour.
  • jeffbabies
  • Apr 15, 2022
  • Permalink
10/10

Best Series Premiere In History!

  • startrekmaniac
  • Mar 4, 2008
  • Permalink
9/10

Exhaustion!

  • Tweekums
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • Permalink
10/10

to be continued

I am writing this review, and i have seen the complete show carefully and many times now. First i want to say that the bad comments and reviews i've read before on IMDb, all over the show, I truly believe that they all never really got the big picture here. This wasn't meant for them to understand(yet)?! But there were plenty of reviews that i cannot compare to yet. They confirmed just the things i knew already. This is the best 4 year movie the human race has ever met/made. And yes, it is a drama in the first place and the science fiction, well, you get that for free with it. You have to have a deep soul to watch this, cause it makes you cry for sure at times. But it is that what makes it so damn good. It is not just a show. it is just art in its purest form. It does let you almost feel as if you are on the Battlestar Galactica yourself.
  • nemod12
  • Oct 6, 2011
  • Permalink
8/10

Good episode, but in my opinion "33" isn't as good as the previous two episodes

  • pjgs200
  • Aug 23, 2016
  • Permalink

This Is The First Day of the New Era of Science Fiction TV!!

  • Ricimer
  • Jan 25, 2006
  • Permalink
10/10

Best of Science Fiction -- Best of Television

This is not a remake of the cheesy series from years ago but a completely re-imagined universe. No more "poofy" haircuts, capes, and pseudo-Egyptian helmets. These Colonials dress in flight suits, uniforms, and clothing that suggest another world as well as ours.

It's science fiction at its best. Thought provoking. Well written. Well acted. Unafraid to tackle controversial topics head on.

And when you think you know what's going to happen next -- Duck! Because the new Battlestar Galactica will upset all your expectations and expose you to new ways of looking at television, science fiction and life.

For the thinking person this show should be at the top of your "must see" list.

Edward James Olmos (William Adama) and Mary McDonnell (Laura Roslyn) are fantastic. Their on screen chemistry is amazing and their abilities to communicate non-verbally unmatched. The nuances of their scenes together are enough to propel this show to the top 10 of all time.

James Callis (Gaius Baltar) is wonderful as well. His mixture of brilliance, insanity, comic relief, and religious zealotry brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "evil genius."

Watch this show!

It's the best show on TV.

And by the way, the show won a Peabody Award. These are given to "outstanding works exhibiting excellence, distinguished achievement, and meritorious service by radio and television networks, stations, cable television organizations, producing organizations, and individuals."
  • deerich2
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • Permalink
9/10

Excellent: continues the quality of the introductory 2-parter

Battlestar Galactica and its rag-tag fleet are fleeing the Cylons and should be largely free of them. However, every 33 minutes the Cylons appear, necessitating a Hyper Space Jump. This has been going on for days - the crew hasn't slept for 130 hours. There seems no end in sight.

This 2-part intro mini-series was excellent. The main plot was highly intriguing and engaging and the sub-plots were great, giving depth to all the characters, tightening the plot development and generally making things grittier and more credible. Quite complex, intelligent and emotional.

Great action scenes and special effects rounded off an excellent mini-series

This, the series proper, continues in the same vein. While the mini-series was scene-setting we now have episode-long plots while still moving the main plot forward. This all hangs together extremely well. This episode's plot is a very interesting one too.
  • grantss
  • Oct 12, 2023
  • Permalink
10/10

Fantasic episode

If you don't know the background, let the episode come over you. Don't try to make sense of everything. It's a battle between the will to survive and deadly exhaustion, with a terrible moral dilemma to resolve when everyone is at their weakest. The camera work, the acting, the lack of dialog, it all contributes to convey the feeling of dread. If that doesn't suck you in, this show may not be for you.

If it did appeal, you won't be disappointed, because whatever happens in this episode is not just forgotten in the next, but it has a lasting effect. That integral continuity is one of the things that makes this a great series and this episode a spectacular start.
  • theovosse
  • Sep 22, 2024
  • Permalink
7/10

Sleepless in Galactica

The crew of Galactica is exhausted after 237 consecutive jumps in intervals of 33 minutes and 132.25 hour without sleep to escape from the Cylons. When Galactica is contacted by the Olympic Carrier, a vessel with more than 1,300 persons, Commander William Adama (Edward James Olmos) and (Mary McDonnell) are advised that there is a traitor on board. However, Dr. Gaius Baltar (James Callis) convinces both leaders that the Olympic Carrier is a menace to the refugee fleet led by Galactica.

In the end of the 70's, "Battlestar Galactica" was a charming series with Capt. Apollo, Lt. Starbuck, Cmdr. Adama and the crew and survivors in this warship. This "updated remake" is reasonable, with a female "Starbuck" and better special effects, but without charismatic characters and the charm of the original show. President Laura Roslin is an awfully ridiculous, useless and inconsistent character, since the hopeless woman has cancer and is a secretary of education that hates politics, but suddenly she thinks that she is a military strategist, sharing the leadership of the survivors with experienced military commanders in times of war. With regard to "33", I am still trying to understand why the Cylons have not simply destroyed the vessel to protect the despicable Gaius. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "33"
  • claudio_carvalho
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • Permalink
6/10

33

  • Prismark10
  • Oct 6, 2020
  • Permalink
4/10

Award-winning schlock is still schlock

This is the award that made me lose all respects for the Hugos.

If such a "distinguished" panel can't see or care about the obvious story-telling problems of Battlestar Galactica, then what worth is their award? The answer: not much.

Award-winning shows should be examples of creativity and excellence, neither of which are in evidence in BG, in this episode or any other that I've seen.

Shooting in drab video is not "artistic", it's just cheap. Shaking the camera is not "creative" it's vomit-inducing and lazy as can be.

All BG has shown is how corrupt most award-giving "academies" really are and how easy it is to buy awards with a lot of PR money.
  • dennismontoya
  • Sep 28, 2006
  • Permalink
4/10

There's no middle ground regarding this series

  • Paularoc
  • Oct 11, 2012
  • Permalink
1/10

Soooo boring!

This was dreadfully slow. There wasn't any explanation as to what was happening except one character saying something like 'why do the cylons come every 33 minutes'. They were writing on a dry erase board and one guy was wearing a shirt and tie??? This is supposed to be Sci Fi??? I got so bored I fell asleep 33 minutes in. THAT should be why it's called 33.
  • infinitumd
  • Apr 19, 2020
  • Permalink
4/10

Missed potential

  • dmslbraune
  • Apr 27, 2025
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.