The Devil in Miss Jones

This was the time when Jenna was truly beautiful and kept releasing one exciting movies after another. This part is natural for her not that i mean she is a bad girl but because Jenna can really seduces and has that nasty, dominant attitude that makes you hard (or wet). You can guess it's a Paul Thomas movie because it's his favorites themes: woman in tension, unhappy discovering rough, hard sexuality... Honestly this is not really the kind of sex i like because it's not much natural and it doesn't come as a healthy, caring way of life... However along Jenna, Miss Samson is also a hot piece with her next door look and as they give way to their temptaion, the scenes are pretty hot!

I do not like paying for movies, but when I do, I want quality.

If you ever saw the original The Devil in Miss Jones, you pretty much saw this one too. Yes, the cast is different, and the scenes are shot different, but the scripts are the same, and therefore, so is the story. Of course, you are not planning to watch this for the story, are you? I would have rated this film higher, except for one issue. The acting is terrible. The dialogs are extremely annoying, to say the least.

In the future I will not be purchasing any more remake productions until, but maybe I'm too nostalgic

Yep, your never let down when Jenna is in the picture, literally speaking! All her Adult Movies are big budget and this one's not any different. You won't be disappointed with the Devil in Miss Jameson, i mean Jones and she certainly likes it that way too. www.adultdvdstoreonline.co.UK/home.html was the fist site where I bought this DVD and fell in Love with Jenna straight away, since then I've bought several of her Adult DVD films and have a big collecting building up.. I highly recommend this movie to anyone who like Porn with a good storyline and attractive women then this is definitely the one for you.

The Devil in Miss Jones (2005)

** (out of 4)

Do we really need a plot description other than this is a remake of the 1972 classic, which helped make the porn genre what it is today? This is a very loose remake to say the least so if you're expecting anything scene-for-scene then you're going to be disappointed because we basically just get the title, a few small connections and a cameo. Outside of those things this here is pretty much on its own and I must admit that I really wasn't all that impressed. The original film is certainly a legend in its own right but I wasn't overly fond of that one either but it's certainly much better than what we have here. Yes, the cinematography was good and they were actually trying to do a "real" movie here with "real" performances but clocking in at 109-minutes, this thing just drags way too much with one boring sex scene after another. Again, people are going to be watching his movie for a variety of reasons. Some are wanting a movie. Some are wanting to get off. Others might just be a fan of the genre. Either way, the sex scenes really weren't anything we haven't seen countless times before and I must admit that I didn't find any of them erotic. Perhaps I'm just an old fashioned person where I prefer that not everyone look like Ken and Barbie models? Either way, both Savanna Samson and Jenna Jameson are pretty enough as are the rest of the girls but their performances....not so much. The original film's Georgina Spelvin makes a cameo appearance, which is probably the best moment in the film. The story itself is a complete boring mess that rarely makes any sense but then again, this is a porno so perhaps we shouldn't have expected one.

To be fair, I at first was quite impressed by this movie, at how well it all looked and how professionally everyone involved behind and in front of the camera obviously was. If you take out the sex sequences you simple have one good movie that could pass as a more serious one, instead of as merely a porn flick. Even the acting was pretty good but pretty soon on I already started to get annoyed and disappointed with this movie.

First of all, does this movie actually have anything to do with the 1973 porno chic classic by the same name? Really hardly anything at all, though this movie is still being listed as being a remake of it. There are only some small connections, though basically the story and all of the characters are totally different ones.

I really did wish this movie stayed more close to the original though. Perhaps that way I would had enjoyed it more and wouldn't had been as annoyed by the story as I was now. It's an extremely messy story that gets told extremely confusing. I'll bet most people who watch this have no idea what is going on, if you don't know what the concept of the original first movie was all about. It's obviously not because it's a complicated story, it's just because it got told so poorly and just plain messy. The jumps between 'reality' and 'fiction' is what makes the movie extremely confusing and tiresome.

The sex sequences come and go quite randomly in this movie but at least the movie does not consists out of pre-shot footage for those moments. They are actually weaved into the movie pretty well. About half way through however the movie suddenly turns into a sadomasochist one, which came pretty much out of nowhere and isn't really in tone with the rest of the movie. But if that's your thing, you obviously won't complain too much about this.

What I liked about this movie was that it did mostly featured some elderly (for porn standards of course) female porn-stars in this. Good to see their careers aren't over for them once they turn 30 but they can actually keep performing, even in some high quality and costly productions like this one.

So it's a movie that is good looking and all and it got professionally done, expect for its annoying and confusing story, that ruined still quite a lot.

6/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/