A sadist lures fledgeling actress to his den of horrors, promising them fame if they act in his "snuff film." They realize only after they are tied up that he really means to torture, rape, ... Read allA sadist lures fledgeling actress to his den of horrors, promising them fame if they act in his "snuff film." They realize only after they are tied up that he really means to torture, rape, and kill them for all to see.A sadist lures fledgeling actress to his den of horrors, promising them fame if they act in his "snuff film." They realize only after they are tied up that he really means to torture, rape, and kill them for all to see.
Deborah Dutch
- First Victim
- (as Debbie Dutch)
Heather Forte
- Rape Victim
- (as Heather Taylor)
Rachel Plaster
- Additional Dead
- (as Rachelle Plaster)
Sica Bosma
- Death Victim
- (as Sica)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Kill the scream queen may sound like a good slasher flick but it is terribly boring and very dumb.
Kill the scream queen is about a crazy filmmaker who auditions girls to be in his snuff film. He rapes and tortures them. This is trash that is not amusing, suspenseful or entertaining.The killer has no motive,okay maybe hes just sick...and very dull. Maybe they could of gave a victim a story of their own. Anything could be an improvement. It needed a lot more.
They could of put just a little more into it. I love horror/slasher films but this is ridiculously bad.
Kill the scream queen is about a crazy filmmaker who auditions girls to be in his snuff film. He rapes and tortures them. This is trash that is not amusing, suspenseful or entertaining.The killer has no motive,okay maybe hes just sick...and very dull. Maybe they could of gave a victim a story of their own. Anything could be an improvement. It needed a lot more.
They could of put just a little more into it. I love horror/slasher films but this is ridiculously bad.
This is my first Bill Zebub film from the Tomb of Terrors box set and while I haven't seen a lot of his film I'm pretty sure they are mostly the same. He ties up (mostly) good looking women and tells them what he's going to do them and then tortures, rapes and murders them- the last two usually off screen. Zebub seems to be able to accomplish what most low budget horror filmmakers are incapable of, getting very good looking women to get very naked for a very long period of time in his movies. Not all of them are stunners but compared to the average low budget movie filled with pock-marked chunkers his films are a breath of fresh air. I guess he doesn't mind sacrificing acting ability (not really necessary here) for good looks. The plot is basically non-existent just a guy filming himself torturing, raping and killing women to sell it as a "film" which he doesn't think anyone will believe is real. His motivation is that scream queens killed horror so he wants to kill them. While I don't agree with that I'm not a fan of the more popular scream queens as none of them are that attractive to me, Zebub's films usually have better looking women. If anything killed horror for a while it was Kevin Williamson's clean, sanitized, witty, safe films in the 90s and found footage. The highlight is easily a hot chick dancing to songs from Here in After. Everyone knows sexy babes can't resist grooving it to the jagged rhythms of Immolation. At 74 minutes and with near constant nudity this is a breeze to get through if you know what to expect from a Zebub film.
I'm a big fan of sleaze and horror movies, when you put them together that's my sweet spot: horrible sleaze. You're not going to get it in this film, though.
There is certainly sleaze, in the form of girls being kidnapped and tortured, tied naked to various things. The sleaze isn't very sleazy, though. It didn't register very high on my sleaze meter, mainly because none of the girls were in the least attractive, nor did they attempt to act as if they were even threatened. They seemed to be thinking more about what was for lunch, or maybe when they could score some crack.
Forget the effects, they were lame in the extreme. The lameness was contributed to by the bad acting; effects are harder to believe when even the actors and actresses aren't buying into them.
Cinematography was pretty bad, they could have hired a couple cameramen from a porn movie and done better. In fact, that might have raised the sleaze factor enough to make it enjoyable. As it is, there are a lot of dark shots where you can't see very clearly, and what you can see isn't looking too good.
The horror factor is nil. Null. Zero. Nada. Zip. Zilch. I've seen kids movies that were more frightening. There's no camp here, either. It's just a movie that attempts to be shockingly sleazy, but doesn't even come close.
There is certainly sleaze, in the form of girls being kidnapped and tortured, tied naked to various things. The sleaze isn't very sleazy, though. It didn't register very high on my sleaze meter, mainly because none of the girls were in the least attractive, nor did they attempt to act as if they were even threatened. They seemed to be thinking more about what was for lunch, or maybe when they could score some crack.
Forget the effects, they were lame in the extreme. The lameness was contributed to by the bad acting; effects are harder to believe when even the actors and actresses aren't buying into them.
Cinematography was pretty bad, they could have hired a couple cameramen from a porn movie and done better. In fact, that might have raised the sleaze factor enough to make it enjoyable. As it is, there are a lot of dark shots where you can't see very clearly, and what you can see isn't looking too good.
The horror factor is nil. Null. Zero. Nada. Zip. Zilch. I've seen kids movies that were more frightening. There's no camp here, either. It's just a movie that attempts to be shockingly sleazy, but doesn't even come close.
My vote is that of one, single, lowly *star*.
I am one who absolutely loves b-grade horror flicks to such a degree that even in some of the more crappy, lowest b-grade flicks I can still actually find entertainment value... but here, in this piece of "film" I can find zero, nil, nada, narry a single redeeming quality!!
How is it that utter waste, such as this, somehow is able to make its way into production, post- production, and even distribution? Yet, true talent with original concepts/content, or at least a fresh spin, on horror plot points/characters.. they get back burnered, pushed aside, and many times even permanently shelved never to see the light of day???!!!! How is that when we have such all out, pathetic garbage thats not even worth a single dime, nor worth ANYONE'S TIME spent on a single viewing of this MESS!!!
Unbelievable, it is, and it is exactly this type pure crap that gives the modern horror genre the stinking bad taste thats left in the viewers proverbial mouths from having witnessed such pathetic material.
WoW! Bill Zebub your "original" name is a perfect indicator of what your capabilities are in the movie making business... $hit, IMO!
1 pathetic star out of 10(and IMO, it doesn't even deserve 1 *star*)
I am one who absolutely loves b-grade horror flicks to such a degree that even in some of the more crappy, lowest b-grade flicks I can still actually find entertainment value... but here, in this piece of "film" I can find zero, nil, nada, narry a single redeeming quality!!
How is it that utter waste, such as this, somehow is able to make its way into production, post- production, and even distribution? Yet, true talent with original concepts/content, or at least a fresh spin, on horror plot points/characters.. they get back burnered, pushed aside, and many times even permanently shelved never to see the light of day???!!!! How is that when we have such all out, pathetic garbage thats not even worth a single dime, nor worth ANYONE'S TIME spent on a single viewing of this MESS!!!
Unbelievable, it is, and it is exactly this type pure crap that gives the modern horror genre the stinking bad taste thats left in the viewers proverbial mouths from having witnessed such pathetic material.
WoW! Bill Zebub your "original" name is a perfect indicator of what your capabilities are in the movie making business... $hit, IMO!
1 pathetic star out of 10(and IMO, it doesn't even deserve 1 *star*)
This movie was absolute trash. The director and stars(?)should be banished from making movies forever. The paper-thin plot concerns a sleazy director played by the sleazy director (now thats acting) advertising on the internet for women to star in a snuff movie.
There's no horror at all, the girls look strung-out and bored, the direction is pointless, the music is misplaced (heavy metal in a library scene?), and the lighting is awful. The director should have cashed in a couple more shopping carts full of aluminum cans and gotten a script, sober actors, and a few light bulbs. As it is, this is one disgusting, nasty, worthless mess of a movie.
There's no horror at all, the girls look strung-out and bored, the direction is pointless, the music is misplaced (heavy metal in a library scene?), and the lighting is awful. The director should have cashed in a couple more shopping carts full of aluminum cans and gotten a script, sober actors, and a few light bulbs. As it is, this is one disgusting, nasty, worthless mess of a movie.
Did you know
- GoofsKiller's second victim (the red head) opens her eyes when the killer prepares her grave.
- ConnectionsFeatured in S&man (2006)
- How long is Kill the Scream Queen?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Kill the scream queen
- Filming locations
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $5,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 14 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Kill the Scream Queen (2004) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer