A documentary on the evidence which shows that the Apollo 11 astronauts never actually landed on the moon.A documentary on the evidence which shows that the Apollo 11 astronauts never actually landed on the moon.A documentary on the evidence which shows that the Apollo 11 astronauts never actually landed on the moon.
Photos
Anne Tonelson
- Narrator
- (voice)
Buzz Aldrin
- Self - Apollo 11 LMP
- (archive footage)
Neil Armstrong
- Self - Apollo 11 CDR
- (archive footage)
Mike Collins
- Self - Apollo 11
- (archive footage)
Lyndon B. Johnson
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as Lyndon Johnson)
John F. Kennedy
- Self - President of the United States of America
- (archive footage)
- (as John Kennedy)
John B. Medaris
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as John Medaris)
Patrick Moore
- Self
- (archive footage)
Richard Nixon
- Self - President of the United States of America
- (archive footage)
Lee Harvey Oswald
- Self
- (archive footage)
Wernher von Braun
- Self
- (archive footage)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The comments here are more related to the event than to the movie itself. Here we read what WE think about the Moon landing, which is not the point of these comments. I think this movie is not good, because it is a propaganda movie, not a documentary. The author should have tried to be more objective and to try to give us another opinions, not only his (For example, FOX's documentary "Conspiracy Theory, Did We Land On The Moon?" did it much better). But this movie has some good moments, such as a parallel with JFK's assassination - it is a great example how the government has been making the fools of its citizens for decades, and will be making, years from now. Hey, really, what are they afraid of, why everything has to be sealed for such a long time? There must be a big lie involved! And what I think about the lending - I believe it's a hoax, because the American government is such a great liar! And I don't need evidences presented in this movie - for me, my own evidences and common sense is quite enough: why Mr. Armstrong left the Apollo program and NASA itself almost right after the first "lending"? Why he has never talked to the press, except on a couple of press conferences with "no further questions" pattern? Why several astronauts and Apollo-related people died mysteriously? Why Soviets have never land on the Moon, when they were much more ahead of Americans in space exploration (3 years in unmanned hard landing missions to the Moon)? Do you think they gave up just like that? Why don't we go to the Moon nowadays, it should be peace of cake compared with 1960s and 1970s efforts? It is 35 years (and counting) from the final Apollo mission, don't you tell me there is nothing left to explore on the Moon! And for God sake, how could it happen the original tapes are missing, it is FIRST MOON LANDING, not just a students' excursion - sorry, we lost our tapes, just like that! No one can convince me there wasn't something compromising on those tapes! We have to admit - something really funny happens, despite the evidences and "evidences". Personally, I think the man is not capable of going to the Moon and returning safely.
The only reason I didn't score this a one is that Sibrel does show that he is adept at the technical aspects of making a film. It is a technically adept film.
That having been said, this is a film based on lies and distortions that are quite easily disproven. Most of the documentary is spent using propaganda techniques to bash the space program, rather than actual fact. And Sibrel's "irrefutable proof" that the landings were faked is easily refuted if you know anything about orbital mechanics.
I do not recommend watching this, but if you do, see it at google video for free. Don't let Bart Sibrel profit from your curiosity.
That having been said, this is a film based on lies and distortions that are quite easily disproven. Most of the documentary is spent using propaganda techniques to bash the space program, rather than actual fact. And Sibrel's "irrefutable proof" that the landings were faked is easily refuted if you know anything about orbital mechanics.
I do not recommend watching this, but if you do, see it at google video for free. Don't let Bart Sibrel profit from your curiosity.
My boyfriend's room mate brought this movie home from his uncle's house and suggested we all watch it with him. At first, I didn't know what to expect, I mean how could the government POSSIBLY have staged a mission to the moon and a lunar landing! Think of all the people who would be involved and having to have them sworn to secrecy about the whole thing or else they may be eliminated? Sounds crazy, right? Well this movie is really fun to watch - it makes you re-think one of the greatest moments in American history. It gives your brain a workout and sparks some interesting debates as to whether or not Apollo 11 actually landed on the moon, let alone with people inside it who were able to walk out of the craft. It raises such topics as shadows on the videos, interesting never publicized video footage, interviews (or lack thereof), lighting on the space craft, photographs (or lack thereof), video *oops*'s, Russia, the cold war, China, future missions to the moon, staged conversations between the astronauts and mission control, the strength and construction of the space craft itself, and things of that nature. Definitely worth a viewing. Keep in mind it's a pretty cheaply made documentary so you can't expect much along the lines of video quality.
Writer/Director Bart Sibrel bases his work here around a can of film that he says was mistakenly sent to him by NASA. He says it shows the astronauts faking the television footage of their trip to the moon by employing camera tricks. The astronauts were in low Earth orbit all the time, and editors on the ground composed this raw footage into just a few seconds of finished film.
Unfortunately Sibrel's research is so slipshod that he doesn't realize his "backstage" footage is really taken in large part from the 30-minute live telecast (also on that reel) that was seen by millions, not hidden away in NASA vaults as he implies. And we have to wonder why Sibrel puts his own conspiratorial narration over the astronauts' audio in the footage, because hearing the astronauts in their own words clearly spells out that the astronauts were just testing the camera, not faking footage.
Finally, anyone can see the raw footage for themselves without having to buy Sibrel's hacked-up version of it. (He shows you more of the Zapruder film of JFK's assassination than of his "smoking gun".) Sibrel thinks he's the only one who's seen it. What's more revealing is the clips from that raw footage that Sibrel chose NOT to use, such as those clearly showing the appropriately distant Earth being eclipsed by the window frames and so forth, destroying his claim that mattes and transparencies were placed in the spacecraft windows to create the illusion of a faraway Earth.
As with most films of this type, Sibrel relies on innuendo, inexpert assumption, misleading commentary, and selective quotation to manipulate the viewer into accepting a conclusion for which there is not a shred of actual evidence.
Unfortunately Sibrel's research is so slipshod that he doesn't realize his "backstage" footage is really taken in large part from the 30-minute live telecast (also on that reel) that was seen by millions, not hidden away in NASA vaults as he implies. And we have to wonder why Sibrel puts his own conspiratorial narration over the astronauts' audio in the footage, because hearing the astronauts in their own words clearly spells out that the astronauts were just testing the camera, not faking footage.
Finally, anyone can see the raw footage for themselves without having to buy Sibrel's hacked-up version of it. (He shows you more of the Zapruder film of JFK's assassination than of his "smoking gun".) Sibrel thinks he's the only one who's seen it. What's more revealing is the clips from that raw footage that Sibrel chose NOT to use, such as those clearly showing the appropriately distant Earth being eclipsed by the window frames and so forth, destroying his claim that mattes and transparencies were placed in the spacecraft windows to create the illusion of a faraway Earth.
As with most films of this type, Sibrel relies on innuendo, inexpert assumption, misleading commentary, and selective quotation to manipulate the viewer into accepting a conclusion for which there is not a shred of actual evidence.
I am a 11th grader at my high school. In my Current World Affairs class a kid in my class had this video and suggested we watch. So we did. I am firm believer that we went to the moon, being that my father works for NASA. Even though I think this movie is the biggest piece of crap I have ever watched, the guy who created it has some serious balls. First of all did he have to show JFK getting shot? And how dare he use all those biblical quotes. The only good thing about this movie is it sparks debates, which is good b/c in my class we have weekly debates. This movie did nothing to change my mind. I think he and Michael Moore should be working together and make another movie. Michael Moore next movie could be called "A Funny Thing Happened on Spetember 11th" or "A Funny thing happened on the way to the white house".
Did you know
- GoofsThis video's genre has been mistakenly identified as a Documentary and History and would be more accurate as Fiction and Comedy.
- ConnectionsFeatured in MoonFaker: Exhibit A: Shadows (2007)
- SoundtracksSpem in Alium
Written by Thomas Tallis
Performed by Magnificat
Directed by Philip Cave
Courtesy of Linn Records, Ltd.
Catalogue # CKD 075
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Нечто странное случилось по пути на Луну
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime47 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content