In 1300s France, King Philippe IV raids the Knights Templar's treasury. Their Grand Master de Molay, burned at stake, curses the king, his advisor, and pope for 13 generations, leading to de... Read allIn 1300s France, King Philippe IV raids the Knights Templar's treasury. Their Grand Master de Molay, burned at stake, curses the king, his advisor, and pope for 13 generations, leading to decades of turmoil before the 100 Years War.In 1300s France, King Philippe IV raids the Knights Templar's treasury. Their Grand Master de Molay, burned at stake, curses the king, his advisor, and pope for 13 generations, leading to decades of turmoil before the 100 Years War.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Firstly I must state I have only seen part 1 of an apparent 5 part series.
And I am glad I did. I have great interest in this period of history and - told by the French - in French - made it all the more enjoyable.
The production is sublime with modern ... improvements like the lighting in castles sometimes obviously artificial (ie: not mere torches) and some racy female costumes (for the period).
The acting was excellent and includes long time favorites like Gerard - and the actress that plays Queen Isabelle is so pretty.
Generally this story is based on fact.
Unless part 2 is awful (doubtful) I am hooked already.
Recommended!
And I am glad I did. I have great interest in this period of history and - told by the French - in French - made it all the more enjoyable.
The production is sublime with modern ... improvements like the lighting in castles sometimes obviously artificial (ie: not mere torches) and some racy female costumes (for the period).
The acting was excellent and includes long time favorites like Gerard - and the actress that plays Queen Isabelle is so pretty.
Generally this story is based on fact.
Unless part 2 is awful (doubtful) I am hooked already.
Recommended!
The basic trait - it is more an experiment than a reasonable adaptation. The clothes are the basic proof. It is saved by few performances and by the expectations of viewer. Sure , not a bad adaptation but always an inspired one. A sketch of Druon novel, reasonable in some measure, less convincing in too many.
Basically, because they could. The original series was and probably still is the best and most literate TV series ever made on this planet. The producers of this remake kept, for the most part, the very same dialogs, which is a very good thing, but have also shortened and simplified them (a.k.a. dumbing down), which robs the characters of their individuality and turns them into soap opera nimrods. They also "glamourized" many parts and replaced the very stylized, evocative and economical sets of the first series - which truly channelled the spirit of medieval illustrations while giving precedence to the acting, the character development, the story and the costumes - with impressive 3-D sets and some amazing CGI work and special effects. What they couldn't replace was Jean Piat's and Hélène Duc's talent and presence. The new cast is stellar but today's actors just pale by comparison with what came before... Whereas Hélène Duc was malevolence incarnate, Jeanne Moreau just aged badly and is scary to look at... They also couldn't replace Georges Delerue's genius in the music department and they used every opportunity given them to show every execution, rape, hanging, torture scene, burning at the stake, etc. in lurid and sadistic detail, something they learned from the so-called euro historical dramas of the last decade, which I call the history-as-a-series-of-body-fluids school and which owes more to Quentin Tarantino than Maurice Druon. What was only suggested is now shown without any shame or embarrassment. I'm not sure this is progress. But you'll certainly get a great many people riveted to their TV screens and maybe get a few of them to actually buy and read the book when they are sufficiently recovered from the shock...
Doing a remake of Les Rois Maudits is a little like doing a remake of Citizen Kane. You've got an awful lot of pressure! The text is powerful but most of the actors can't get a hold of it. Mind you, the producers have mostly hired good actors, but in many instances (Philippe Torreton for example), they can't get inside their characters, because it's not in their range. Others, like Julie Depardieu or Jeanne Moreau in some instances, are just pathetic!
Josée Dayan, the director, has a reputation for not taking many shots, so that the actors play on their "first energy". The result is interesting in some scenes, but you often get the feeling that there isn't any actor direction at all, which is very dangerous with this text, which requires some kind of classical training for the actors (No wonder the best actor was Eric Ruf, of La Comédie Française).
No wonder why in most stores in Paris you see more space for the 1972 version than for this year's!
Josée Dayan, the director, has a reputation for not taking many shots, so that the actors play on their "first energy". The result is interesting in some scenes, but you often get the feeling that there isn't any actor direction at all, which is very dangerous with this text, which requires some kind of classical training for the actors (No wonder the best actor was Eric Ruf, of La Comédie Française).
No wonder why in most stores in Paris you see more space for the 1972 version than for this year's!
When this screened on SBS, I caught the last half-hour of the first episode by accident. I was hooked! The series itself it so over the top and camp but it's an interesting and fascinating way to bring the story to life.
In Ausralia, when it first screened it was shown on Sunday nights and Monday mornings at work resulted in the kinda of intense water-cooler discussions not repeated until Masterchef! It was recently replayed and it was as fabulous as the first time round. The sets and costumes are amazing - it's really avant garde theatre done for TV. Possibly the first time that has actually worked.
And of course, then there's Jeanne Moreau - impossibly beautiful, vulgar and scheming all at once. I'd love to read the book - I'm yet to find an English translation.
It's definitely not for everyone - but if you don't mind your history with a bit camp, this is just great fun and it's exquisite to look at.
In Ausralia, when it first screened it was shown on Sunday nights and Monday mornings at work resulted in the kinda of intense water-cooler discussions not repeated until Masterchef! It was recently replayed and it was as fabulous as the first time round. The sets and costumes are amazing - it's really avant garde theatre done for TV. Possibly the first time that has actually worked.
And of course, then there's Jeanne Moreau - impossibly beautiful, vulgar and scheming all at once. I'd love to read the book - I'm yet to find an English translation.
It's definitely not for everyone - but if you don't mind your history with a bit camp, this is just great fun and it's exquisite to look at.
Did you know
- ConnectionsFeatured in L'enfer de Guillaume Depardieu (2010)
- How many seasons does A Cursed Monarchy have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- A Cursed Monarchy
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content