[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Invasion des mondes

Original title: The War of the Worlds
  • Video
  • 2005
  • Unrated
  • 2h 59m
IMDb RATING
2.7/10
2.3K
YOUR RATING
Invasion des mondes (2005)
ActionAdventureSci-Fi

In one of the most faithful adaptations of HG Wells' science fiction masterpiece, Martians launch a ruthless assault on an unsuspecting Victorian England, in an attempt to escape their dying... Read allIn one of the most faithful adaptations of HG Wells' science fiction masterpiece, Martians launch a ruthless assault on an unsuspecting Victorian England, in an attempt to escape their dying planet.In one of the most faithful adaptations of HG Wells' science fiction masterpiece, Martians launch a ruthless assault on an unsuspecting Victorian England, in an attempt to escape their dying planet.

  • Director
    • Timothy Hines
  • Writers
    • H.G. Wells
    • Timothy Hines
    • Susan Goforth
  • Stars
    • Anthony Piana
    • Jack Clay
    • James Lathrop
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    2.7/10
    2.3K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Timothy Hines
    • Writers
      • H.G. Wells
      • Timothy Hines
      • Susan Goforth
    • Stars
      • Anthony Piana
      • Jack Clay
      • James Lathrop
    • 126User reviews
    • 18Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos4

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster

    Top cast56

    Edit
    Anthony Piana
    • The Writer…
    Jack Clay
    • Ogilvy
    James Lathrop
    James Lathrop
    • The Artilleryman
    Darlene Sellers
    Darlene Sellers
    • Mrs. Elphinstone
    • (as Darlene Renee Sellers)
    John Kaufmann
    • The Curate
    Susan Goforth
    Susan Goforth
    • The Wife
    Jamie Lynn Sease
    • Miss Elphinstone
    W. Bernard Bauman
    • Henderson
    Edwin Stone
    • The Potman
    Tom Fouche
    • Newspaper Boy
    Mark Wilt
    • Gregg the Butcher
    Erik Barzdukas
    • Butcher's Son
    E. Leonard Helland
    • Lord Hilton's Butler…
    Barbara Bauman
    • Mary - Writer's Servant
    Daniel Somerfield
    • Stent
    Donovan Le
    • Shop Clerk…
    Andy Clawson
    • Nextdoor Neighbor
    • (as Andrew Clawson)
    • …
    Eric Rands
    • Sapper #1
    • Director
      • Timothy Hines
    • Writers
      • H.G. Wells
      • Timothy Hines
      • Susan Goforth
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews126

    2.72.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    2ColinPotterHatesWalking

    Like Lord of the Rings - only with more walking. A LOT more walking. And then some.

    I must admit I burst out laughing when I saw one reviewer compare this to LOTR. Well yes, if you exclude the dwarfs, the cast of thousands, the great special effects, the big battles, the strong characterization, the decent plot, the good acting, the classy direction and everything else. Which leaves you with the walking. And boy, does this film do walking! If Mr Piano had his way, this would probably be an uninterrupted three hours of hardcore walking through the Wisconsin countryside, but every 40 minutes or so these pesky Martians pop up for a few seconds to interrupt him before he goes for another bit of a ramble. You've never seen so much walking in a movie. If this really had a $20m budget, most of it must have gone on Mr Piano's shoes, because he had to get through plenty of pairs with all the walking he does. Which explains why there's no money left for decent effects, a decent video camera or proper actors. Honestly, it's like watching some bizarre fetish video for people with a thing about going for long walks in period costumes. Even on fast-forward, this is a looonnnggg walk.

    As for the sci-fi stuff, I think it was a mistake to put Martians in the film: they only get in the way of the walking, which is clearly much more interesting to the director than the story.

    I wonder how much Mr Piano charges to walk dogs?
    1brianlindstrand

    Wow...

    Wow...

    I picked this up at the local Wal-Mart after reading online that it had been released early. I've been following this online for some time, and just had to buy the film.

    Wow...

    I guess the thing that really struck me was the editing, or lack thereof. Time and again, characters (usually The Narrator and whoever he is with) are shown walking...and walking...and walking. I am not an editor, but I do know that you can cut between someone leaving point A to show them arriving at point B. There is no need to show almost the entire journey! Wow...

    I actually ended up feeling somewhat sorry for the actors involved in this. They seem to have been given no direction as to what to do during scenes other than to look scared or look happy, depending on what action was to be added at a later date.

    Wow...

    Why it was decided to do almost all the effects using CG is beyond me. Even ILM still employs miniatures sometimes. One of the most distracting uses of green screen in this film is the constant rushing about of (according to the end credits) the same group of people representing the citizenry of different towns and cities, including London. At times these folk are coming and going with no regard as to the angle of the shot or the distance they are from the camera. In one shot in London, there appear to be at least two men over six feet tall walking just behind the narrator's brother (played by star Anthony Piana without his distracting mustache). Not since GETTYSBURG have I seen such a fake piece of facial hair.

    Wow...

    Why Timothy Hines talked up this film the way he did is beyond me. It is a turkey, plain and simple. On the plus side (at least for me) it has provided some of the most genuine laugh-out-loud bits of hilarity I have seen in quite a while.
    1procopius-2

    Neal hit the nail on the head , this is horrendous.

    Finally i thought someone is going to do justice to H.G. Wells's classic , not another version set in the wrong locale or era , but one based firmly on the book . Well it definitely follows the book pretty closely , and that is the only plus to this mess.

    This is 180 Min's (yes 3 hours) long , the book is only around 150 pages .

    If Timothy Hines had the nerve to come on here and say "if you can do any better ..." i would say "yes , i could" and i have never used a video camera or been to any sort or drama school in my life.

    I paid good money to get this crap over to the UK from the USA , do not make the same mistake as me .
    1crowder-1

    makes Ed Wood look like Orson Welles

    After hearing the word of mouth of just how bad this film is I took the plunge and bought the DVD. That said everything previously mentioned about this film is true. For a film that claimed to have a budget in the millions it just does not show on the screen at all. The list of problems with the film could drag on forever. Chief amongst them is the film is simply too long. It dragged on for a few minutes short of 3 hours. Nearly an hour probably could have been cut off the run time had the editor simply removed the overabundance of scenes dealing with nothing more then the main character wandering around aimlessly.

    Secondly, as many had pointed out from the "trailers", the special effects are anything but special. The tripods looked OK in a few shots here and there but beyond that everything was grade-Z 1970's or 1980's quality. Probably the worst effects of all were the horses, which stiffly tottered back and forth as they moved. The heat ray effects were laughable, as people were reduced to bones that somehow were still able to flail about without any muscles. Also pitiful was the Thunderchild sequence, in which the Thunderchild, described in the book as an ironclad ram, looked nothing of the sort. Instead it resembled a World War 1 era destroyer, complete with deck guns (which fired but had no visible crew), and torpedo tubes.

    The colors and backgrounds were just as bad as the effects. Most laughable of all was a scene early on in which the main character and his wife go for a nighttime stroll and he points out Mars to her in the sky. Well, the sky is black, but the views of the characters and the landscape around them is broad daylight. There is also a very sharp demarcation between the real landscape, bathed in full sunlight, and the fake black night sky with overly large fuzzy stars. To detract even further, the color of the scenes made no sense. In some they are bathed in orange light. In others green light. In still others it's blue light. In some instances the outsides are orange lit but the interiors of houses are green or blue. The frame-rate and camera is very shaky, giving everything a stuttering look.

    Finally, the acting is overall sub-par. One man portrays two characters who's sole difference was one lacked a mustache. This led to some confusion at times as to who was who and where they all were. The English accents, even to American ears, are outrageous.

    In summary, this movie could very well make a claim to being the worst film released in recent times. I have not seen Gigli or some of the other recent flops but this one, because of it's poor quality in every respect, must easily be worse then anything that mainstream Hollywood has put out. I would not be surprised if the movie makes it to the bottom 10 or 20 in the IMDb rankings. It's a pity that Mystery Science Theater is not still around.
    erikruud

    I only watched the first hour!

    I guess I am better off than most of the people who commented on this film. I checked mine out from the local library, so I haven't lost $8.00.

    I really wanted to see a version of the movie that was faithful to the book. While this version is faithful, it is so badly made that I could not continue watching it.

    What is with the frame rate? At points it looks like they shot it at 24fps and then deleted every third or forth frame! There are a few shots were the characters skitter about so fast that I expected to here the music from the Benny Hill chase scenes.

    The worst Dr. Who episode looks better than this. My friend in high school made better films with just a Super8 camera.

    Very Disappointing.

    More like this

    Invasion
    3.2
    Invasion
    La nouvelle guerre des mondes
    6.5
    La nouvelle guerre des mondes
    War of the Servers
    8.0
    War of the Servers
    War of the Worlds: Final Invasion
    2.1
    War of the Worlds: Final Invasion
    La Guerre des mondes
    7.0
    La Guerre des mondes
    War of the Worlds
    War of the Worlds
    La guerre des mondes
    5.2
    La guerre des mondes
    Wojna swiatów - nastepne stulecie
    6.9
    Wojna swiatów - nastepne stulecie
    War of the Worlds: Goliath
    5.4
    War of the Worlds: Goliath
    War of the Worlds: The Attack
    3.2
    War of the Worlds: The Attack
    La Guerre des mondes
    6.6
    La Guerre des mondes
    La guerra de los mundos. La verdadera historia
    6.2
    La guerra de los mundos. La verdadera historia

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      According to the website owned by one of the the providers of the horses used in the film, the portion of the production involving their horses was shot on a horse ranch outside of Seattle. Other horses and carriages were shot at other ranches with large green-screen setups over eight weeks.
    • Goofs
      After the narrator flees the pit after the Martians' first attack, the train that passes in the background is a late 20th century Americal diesel model rather than a British steam locomotive.
    • Crazy credits
      The Copyright date is given as "MMDCCLVIII", which is the year 2758.
    • Alternate versions
      In response to the criticisms over the 3-hour running time, a Director's Cut released that excises approximately 45 minutes of the original version.
    • Connections
      Referenced in DVD/Lazerdisc/VHS collection 2016 (2016)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ4

    • I thought this was supposed to star Michael Caine, Eric Stoltz and Charlize Theron?
    • Where can I see clips?
    • Where can I buy or rent The Classic War Of The Worlds?

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • December 19, 2007 (France)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Official site
      • Pendragon Pictures
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • H.G. Wells' 'The War of the Worlds'
    • Filming locations
      • Seattle, Washington, USA
    • Production company
      • Pendragon Pictures
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      2 hours 59 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.78 : 1

    Related news

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • IMDb Answers: Help fill gaps in our data
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.