[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
IMDbPro
Das grinsende Gesicht (1921)

User reviews

Das grinsende Gesicht

2 reviews
6/10

Not as good as Veidt's, but this has its merits.

  • F Gwynplaine MacIntyre
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • Permalink
6/10

Nothing To Laugh At

No, it's not the famous (and deservedly so) 1928 version, starring Conrad Veidt and directed by Paul Leni. This is an earlier version of the story about Franz Hobling, discarded as a child when his aunt decided he stood in the way of her son inheriting his father's vast wealth; sold and his face disfigured by an exhibitor of freaks; falling into the hands of the gentle showman Franz Weissmuller; falling in love with Weissmuller's blind adopted daughter, Lucienne Delacroix; and finally being restored to his inherited place in life, only to be mocked and derided.

It's not only the later version this must contend with. Two reels are missing from the version I saw, leaving the movie poorly paced and the characters' motivations undealt with -- but then, silent film was rarely a genre that explored motivation. That said, this movie does shows signs of dealing with Victor Hugo's tale of misery, perversion, and cruelty save among the most humble. The presentation of the film as it exists is good, with the images clean, and offered in a well-toned print, showing off the careful design and camerawork.
  • boblipton
  • Aug 9, 2024
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.