While spending time visiting his grandfather in the small town called Harvest, Eric starts having some strange experiences. Young Julia befriends him, though she appears to be a ghost, as is... Read allWhile spending time visiting his grandfather in the small town called Harvest, Eric starts having some strange experiences. Young Julia befriends him, though she appears to be a ghost, as is her mother, who is not as friendly.While spending time visiting his grandfather in the small town called Harvest, Eric starts having some strange experiences. Young Julia befriends him, though she appears to be a ghost, as is her mother, who is not as friendly.
- Directors
- Writers
- Stars
Ariauna Albright
- Dreamgirl
- (voice)
Clayton Simchick
- Hood
- (as Arthur Adams)
- Directors
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
That flashy box-cover fooled me into thinking I was getting into a silly, fun Charles Band ride. It was all the more difficult after that to get into the mood for this very spare ghost chiller, but I was hooked in 5 minutes.
The prologue sees a young man (possibly gay ?) driving through the country to greet his grandfather after some time in the city. The farm is modest, the fields never-ending and grandpa is full of love for his grandson. Then visions of the past haunt the son's dreams, until he finds himself sleepwalking into some of his granddad's old friends' homes...to burn them.
The ghost story is simple and reminiscent of "The Nesting", and probably a few other ghost movies. The lead looks convincingly lost in the situation he's put in (and obviously lost in a few other areas of his life). The settings adequately serve the haunting storyline, as this town is clearly a town where nothing happens and secrets stay buried.
Although there was no surprise to be found, the creepy pace of the movie and a modest but distinctive direction kept me interested all the way through.
The prologue sees a young man (possibly gay ?) driving through the country to greet his grandfather after some time in the city. The farm is modest, the fields never-ending and grandpa is full of love for his grandson. Then visions of the past haunt the son's dreams, until he finds himself sleepwalking into some of his granddad's old friends' homes...to burn them.
The ghost story is simple and reminiscent of "The Nesting", and probably a few other ghost movies. The lead looks convincingly lost in the situation he's put in (and obviously lost in a few other areas of his life). The settings adequately serve the haunting storyline, as this town is clearly a town where nothing happens and secrets stay buried.
Although there was no surprise to be found, the creepy pace of the movie and a modest but distinctive direction kept me interested all the way through.
It's quite tragic when a fresh idea gets thrown out in the form of a horrific film, but this movie delivers just that. While the underlying plot is actually quite intriguing and original, the movie is simply so poorly made that one cannot forgive the creators. The opening dialogoue between the two main characters is a perfect example of what you're getting into when you view this film. You can't even understand what the two men are saying. The picture quality is worse than a fifty year old second-hand camera. The acting is horrible, the scripting is horrible, the camera work is horrible.. The movie is horrible. Don't waste your time, money, or eyesight.
Those who like thoughtful and interesting low-budget material will find this one a rough gem of sorts. It was a as captivating to me as the time I first saw the 1963 Carnival of Souls, and just as spooky. There is a lot to be said for the eerieness of the low-budget scare film that just does not have the cash to create big special effects and overwhelming music tracks. In fact, some of the creepiest moments on film come when there is no music track or very little music track. This tends to heighten the effect of reality, making everything seem a little too realistic. And without overblown special effects, the story and mood of the film must carry it along. While not perfect, this is a heck of a lot better than what passes for scares in most Hollywood productions. Ignore the 19 nitwits (at the time of this writing) who voted this film a "one", they obviously either have an negative agenda to push against this movie, or they can't sit through anything that doesn't have a gore-laden dismemberment every ten minutes, where plot doesn't matter. It's worth a couple of bucks to rent or to buy a used tape.
A young man travels to his grandfathers house, finds an old spoon and soon starts to have visions of a brutal murder. Before you know it Eric (Galvin) is guided by a ghostly force to kill a bunch of old men.
I didn't expect much from VOTD when I popped in the DVD player, but by the end I was pleasantly surprised. VOTD turns out to a be a competently made and interesting low budget flick that I got into. Writer/director Don Adams and Harry Picardi show alot of potential here and could have done much better with more money and a cast of professional actors. They give us some cool moments and use the DV camera in some pretty interesting ways. The acting isn't great and the sound and picture quality is pretty bad. It runs a little too long for its own good and drags along the way. By the middle of the flick I figured out what the twist was, but in the end it still disturbed me and I felt fulfilled. VOTD is an original little flick with alot of good qualities in its favor.
Vengeance Of The Dead has its problems, but is a solid flick with alot of potential. Its a valiant effort all around, but would have benefited from a tighter script, a bigger budget, and professional actors. I still recommend you check it out. I've seen much bigger flicks that have been much worse.
DVD Details: Trailers, director commentary, teaser and making of War Wolf (Adam and Picardi's next flick). The picture is very grainy and the sound quality is pretty bad. Not a good DVD transfer.
I didn't expect much from VOTD when I popped in the DVD player, but by the end I was pleasantly surprised. VOTD turns out to a be a competently made and interesting low budget flick that I got into. Writer/director Don Adams and Harry Picardi show alot of potential here and could have done much better with more money and a cast of professional actors. They give us some cool moments and use the DV camera in some pretty interesting ways. The acting isn't great and the sound and picture quality is pretty bad. It runs a little too long for its own good and drags along the way. By the middle of the flick I figured out what the twist was, but in the end it still disturbed me and I felt fulfilled. VOTD is an original little flick with alot of good qualities in its favor.
Vengeance Of The Dead has its problems, but is a solid flick with alot of potential. Its a valiant effort all around, but would have benefited from a tighter script, a bigger budget, and professional actors. I still recommend you check it out. I've seen much bigger flicks that have been much worse.
DVD Details: Trailers, director commentary, teaser and making of War Wolf (Adam and Picardi's next flick). The picture is very grainy and the sound quality is pretty bad. Not a good DVD transfer.
A tidy horror/thriller from Wisconsin filmmakers Adams and Picardi with lots of twists and turns and many offbeat touches. A young guy goes to visit his grandpa down on the farm, and soon is spending those soft summer nights sleepwalking and torching elderly neighbors, apparently coaxed/goaded along by some restless ghosts. I watched the DVD, which was chock-full of cool extras about the filmmakers and their projects. VENGEANCE OF THE DEAD is what solid b-movie filmmaking looks like.
Did you know
- TriviaRiffed for the Rifftrax brand by MST3K alums Kevin Murphy, Michael J. Nelson and Bill Corbett.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Bunker of Blood: Chapter 6: Zombie Lust: Night Flesh (2018)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content